Skip to content
Blood Cancer Talks Survey
The purpose of this survey is to assess the impact of Blood Cancer Talks on education and patient care in the field of hematologic malignancies, and gather your feedback to improve the podcast into the future. Thanks in advance! Raj, Eddie & Ashwin
1.
Which of the following categories best describes you?
Attending Physician
Hematology and/or Oncology Fellow
Resident
Pharmacist
Advanced Practice Provider (APP)
Patient and family
Other (please specify)
2.
If you are an attending physician, what kind of patients do you see in practice?
Hematologic malignancies
Hematologic malignancies and solid tumors
Other (please specify)
3.
How did you find out about the podcast?
Twitter
LinkedIn
Word of mouth
MashupMD
Other (please specify)
4.
Where are you located?
North America
South America
Asia
Australia or New Zealand
Europe (including UK)
Africa
Other (please specify)
5.
How would you describe the overall quality of the podcast?
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
6.
The length of the podcast is
Too short
About right
Too long
Too short
About right
Too long
7.
The podcast provides access to experts that you may otherwise not have access to.
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
8.
The podcast helped to improve your critical appraisal skills; i.e. to better understand how the design of studies affects their ability to inform clinical practice
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
9.
Blood Cancer Talks helps you stay updated on latest data/studies in hematologic malignancies
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
10.
Listening to the podcast has improved your knowledge on rare diseases or unusual clinical circumstances that you may not see very often.
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
11.
The podcast has led to improvements in your knowledge in clinically-relevant areas
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
12.
Please provide your feedback and suggestions for the podcast, including any topics you would like us to cover or suggested guests.
13.
We typically stick to a fairly consistent 'ask the expert' disease-specific format. We are considering trialling additional episode formats. Which, if any, of the following episode formats would interest you?
Pro-Con debate (e.g. CAR T versus bispecifics in lymphoma)
Roundtable (e.g. 2-3 experts in discussion)
Evidence-based medicine (e.g. an episode about how to interpret Kaplan-Meier curves or power calculations)
Life / career stories and reflections from leaders in the field
Solving tricky clinical cases
None of the above
Other (please specify)