Skip to content
ICCB 2025 Post Congress Survey
2 / 2
100%
1.
Please indicate your overall satisfaction with ICCB 2025:
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
Somewhat dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
Somewhat dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
2.
Did you present (talk or poster) or organize a session (symposium / workshop) at ICCB 2025?
Yes
No
3.
Please rate the following congress services, as applicable:
Excellent
Good
Average / Neutral
Slightly below average
Poor
N/A
Abstract Submission System
Excellent
Good
Average / Neutral
Slightly below average
Poor
N/A
Online Registration
Excellent
Good
Average / Neutral
Slightly below average
Poor
N/A
On-site registration / badge pickup
Excellent
Good
Average / Neutral
Slightly below average
Poor
N/A
Congress mobile app
Excellent
Good
Average / Neutral
Slightly below average
Poor
N/A
Overall attendee support
Excellent
Good
Average / Neutral
Slightly below average
Poor
N/A
Meeting rooms (size, access, etc.)
Excellent
Good
Average / Neutral
Slightly below average
Poor
N/A
Meeting room audiovisual
Excellent
Good
Average / Neutral
Slightly below average
Poor
N/A
Quality of exhibitors
Excellent
Good
Average / Neutral
Slightly below average
Poor
N/A
4.
Please rate the overall quality of the scientific program content you attended/experienced at ICCB. Please answer each row.
Excellent
Good
Average / Neutral
Slightly below average
Poor
N/A
Overall quality of the Scientific Program Content
Excellent
Good
Average / Neutral
Slightly below average
Poor
N/A
Plenary Talks
Excellent
Good
Average / Neutral
Slightly below average
Poor
N/A
Poster Sessions
Excellent
Good
Average / Neutral
Slightly below average
Poor
N/A
Speed Talks
Excellent
Good
Average / Neutral
Slightly below average
Poor
N/A
Contributed Sessions (Oral Talks)
Excellent
Good
Average / Neutral
Slightly below average
Poor
N/A
Symposia
Excellent
Good
Average / Neutral
Slightly below average
Poor
N/A
Pre-congress workshops, training courses, roundtable discussions
Excellent
Good
Average / Neutral
Slightly below average
Poor
N/A
SCB Members Meeting
Excellent
Good
Average / Neutral
Slightly below average
Poor
N/A
If you rated anything from average to poor, what could we do to improve?
5.
What were your objectives for this congress? (check all that apply)
Networking opportunities
Education
Presenting
Professional development / training
Learn more about the field
Stay current on research
Other (please specify)
6.
What more could we have done to help you meet those objectives?
7.
Tell us about your experience with this congress (check all that apply):
I was inspired to pursue new avenues of research or conservation work
I learned about new approaches or techniques that I plan to use in my own work
I re-established old professional contacts
I established new professional contacts in my area of interest
I established new professional contacts in my country
I met new professional contacts outside of my country
I launched new conservation initiatives/projects at the congress
I started discussing new conservation initiatives/projects at the congress
I was invited to join conservation initiatives/projects at the congress
I met with a possible mentors/supervisors/employers
Other (please specify)
None of the above
8.
We made a special focus to improve language accessibility at the congress. Please rate our performance:
Excellent
Good
Average
Slightly below average
Poor
N/A
Excellent
Good
Average
Slightly below average
Poor
N/A
9.
We also made a special focus to improve First Nations engagement at the congress. Please rate our performance:
Excellent
Good
Average
Slightly below average
Poor
N/A
Excellent
Good
Average
Slightly below average
Poor
N/A
10.
Do you have any suggestions on how to advance diversity, equity and inclusion at future congresses?
