Creo AAX and Top-Down Design Suitability Quiz

We have designed a short test to help you gauge how relevant this course is to your role. Once completed, you’ll receive a score to use with the scale below, to help you make an informed decision.

High Relevance (80–100%)
This course is highly relevant to your role. You frequently work with assemblies and will benefit significantly from the training.

Moderate Relevance (50–79%)
This course covers several areas you encounter occasionally. It will help improve efficiency and broaden your skills

Low Relevance (Below 50%)
This course may not be essential for your current role. Training could be useful for long-term development or if your responsibilities change.

Question Title

1. Does your company have an Advanced Assembly Extension (AAX) or a Creo Design Advanced license (sometimes referred to as T2)? (Required.)

Yes

Question Title

2. Would it be useful use skeleton models to apply a top-down design approach to assembly design? (Required.)

Yes

Question Title

3. Do you need to robustly share geometry between components to provide common information relating to size, position and interfaces? (Required.)

Yes

Question Title

4. Do you work with Merge or Inheritance models, such as linking or relating a machined casting to the original casting? (Required.)

Yes

Question Title

5. Would it be useful to manage component interchangeability or program-driven component swaps in your assemblies to improve efficiency and robustness? (Required.)

Yes

Question Title

6. Would it be useful to create and reuse assembly-level features using an assembly UDF library? (Required.)

Yes

Question Title

7. Would it be beneficial to develop modular or automated design schemes that propagate changes from a single centralized source? (Required.)

Yes

Question Title

8. How often do you need to control external references or manage reference scope to maintain robust assembly structures? (Required.)

Often

Sometimes

Rarely

Never

Question Title

9. Would it be beneficial to substitute detailed components with lightweight representations using default envelopes and simplified representations? (Required.)

Yes

Question Title

10. Would it be useful to create virtual assemblies using unplaced components for defining the placeholders in a design project structure? (Required.)

Yes

Creo AAX and Top-Down Design Suitability Quiz

Question Title

* 1. Does your company have an Advanced Assembly Extension (AAX) or a Creo Design Advanced license (sometimes referred to as T2)? (Required.)

Question Title

* 2. Would it be useful use skeleton models to apply a top-down design approach to assembly design? (Required.)

Question Title

* 3. Do you need to robustly share geometry between components to provide common information relating to size, position and interfaces? (Required.)

Question Title

* 4. Do you work with Merge or Inheritance models, such as linking or relating a machined casting to the original casting? (Required.)

Question Title

* 5. Would it be useful to manage component interchangeability or program-driven component swaps in your assemblies to improve efficiency and robustness? (Required.)

Question Title

* 6. Would it be useful to create and reuse assembly-level features using an assembly UDF library? (Required.)

Question Title

* 7. Would it be beneficial to develop modular or automated design schemes that propagate changes from a single centralized source? (Required.)

Question Title

* 8. How often do you need to control external references or manage reference scope to maintain robust assembly structures? (Required.)

Question Title

* 9. Would it be beneficial to substitute detailed components with lightweight representations using default envelopes and simplified representations? (Required.)

Question Title

* 10. Would it be useful to create virtual assemblies using unplaced components for defining the placeholders in a design project structure? (Required.)

1. Does your company have an Advanced Assembly Extension (AAX) or a Creo Design Advanced license (sometimes referred to as T2)? (Required.)

2. Would it be useful use skeleton models to apply a top-down design approach to assembly design? (Required.)

3. Do you need to robustly share geometry between components to provide common information relating to size, position and interfaces? (Required.)

4. Do you work with Merge or Inheritance models, such as linking or relating a machined casting to the original casting? (Required.)

5. Would it be useful to manage component interchangeability or program-driven component swaps in your assemblies to improve efficiency and robustness? (Required.)

6. Would it be useful to create and reuse assembly-level features using an assembly UDF library? (Required.)

7. Would it be beneficial to develop modular or automated design schemes that propagate changes from a single centralized source? (Required.)

8. How often do you need to control external references or manage reference scope to maintain robust assembly structures? (Required.)

9. Would it be beneficial to substitute detailed components with lightweight representations using default envelopes and simplified representations? (Required.)

10. Would it be useful to create virtual assemblies using unplaced components for defining the placeholders in a design project structure? (Required.)