CWMGR Evaluation – 2023-10-25 Survey

	Strongly agree	Somewhat agree	Equivocal	Somewhat disagree	Strongly disagree	N/A
Presenters provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation	Presenters provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Strongly agree	Presenters provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Somewhat agree	Presenters provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Equivocal	Presenters provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Somewhat disagree	Presenters provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Strongly disagree	Presenters provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation N/A
Presenters provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge	Presenters provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Strongly agree	Presenters provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Somewhat agree	Presenters provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Equivocal	Presenters provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Somewhat disagree	Presenters provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Strongly disagree	Presenters provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge N/A
Presenters stimulated enthusiasm about their topic	Presenters stimulated enthusiasm about their topic Strongly agree	Presenters stimulated enthusiasm about their topic Somewhat agree	Presenters stimulated enthusiasm about their topic Equivocal	Presenters stimulated enthusiasm about their topic Somewhat disagree	Presenters stimulated enthusiasm about their topic Strongly disagree	Presenters stimulated enthusiasm about their topic N/A
Presenters established a good rapport with the audience	Presenters established a good rapport with the audience Strongly agree	Presenters established a good rapport with the audience Somewhat agree	Presenters established a good rapport with the audience Equivocal	Presenters established a good rapport with the audience Somewhat disagree	Presenters established a good rapport with the audience Strongly disagree	Presenters established a good rapport with the audience N/A
At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning	At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Strongly agree	At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Somewhat agree	At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Equivocal	At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Somewhat disagree	At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Strongly disagree	At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning N/A
Presentation was balanced and unbiased.	Presentation was balanced and unbiased. Strongly agree	Presentation was balanced and unbiased. Somewhat agree	Presentation was balanced and unbiased. Equivocal	Presentation was balanced and unbiased. Somewhat disagree	Presentation was balanced and unbiased. Strongly disagree	Presentation was balanced and unbiased. N/A

Strongly agree

Somewhat agree

Equivocal

Somewhat disagree

Strongly disagree

N/A

Presenters provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation

Presenters provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Strongly agree

Presenters provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Somewhat agree

Presenters provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Equivocal

Presenters provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Somewhat disagree

Presenters provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Strongly disagree

Presenters provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation N/A

Presenters provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge

Presenters provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Strongly agree

Presenters provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Somewhat agree

Presenters provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Equivocal

Presenters provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Somewhat disagree

Presenters provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Strongly disagree

Presenters provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge N/A

Presenters stimulated enthusiasm about their topic

Presenters stimulated enthusiasm about their topic Strongly agree

Presenters stimulated enthusiasm about their topic Somewhat agree

Presenters stimulated enthusiasm about their topic Equivocal

Presenters stimulated enthusiasm about their topic Somewhat disagree

Presenters stimulated enthusiasm about their topic Strongly disagree

Presenters stimulated enthusiasm about their topic N/A

Presenters established a good rapport with the audience

Presenters established a good rapport with the audience Strongly agree

Presenters established a good rapport with the audience Somewhat agree

Presenters established a good rapport with the audience Equivocal

Presenters established a good rapport with the audience Somewhat disagree

Presenters established a good rapport with the audience Strongly disagree

Presenters established a good rapport with the audience N/A

At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning

At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Strongly agree

At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Somewhat agree

At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Equivocal

At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Somewhat disagree

At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Strongly disagree

At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning N/A

Presentation was balanced and unbiased.

Presentation was balanced and unbiased. Strongly agree

Presentation was balanced and unbiased. Somewhat agree

Presentation was balanced and unbiased. Equivocal

Presentation was balanced and unbiased. Somewhat disagree

Presentation was balanced and unbiased. Strongly disagree

Presentation was balanced and unbiased. N/A

Question Title

* 2. What is your overall evaluation of these presenters?

Outstanding

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Comments for this presenter:

General Presenter Comments:

Question Title

* 3. What I liked most:

Question Title

* 4. What I learned from this session:

Question Title

* 5. Suggestions for change:

Question Title

* 6. Other general comments:

Question Title

* 7. As a result of these rounds (choose one that is most applicable):

I plan to make changes in my professional activity

These rounds validate my current knowledge, beliefs and current activity

I need more information before I will change my activity

This activity increased my knowledge or awareness of the topic

These rounds were not relevant to my practice

Please click the "Submit my feedback" button below to save your responses and be taken to the attendance collection survey.

Question Title

* 1. Shelly Dev & Tina Martimianakis

Question Title

* 2. What is your overall evaluation of these presenters?

Question Title

* 3. What I liked most:

Question Title

* 4. What I learned from this session:

Question Title

* 5. Suggestions for change:

Question Title

* 6. Other general comments:

Question Title

* 7. As a result of these rounds (choose one that is most applicable):