Conference Evaluation

* 1. Overall, how would you rate the APA Scientific Conference?

  Strongly Disagree Neither Agree or Disagree Strongly Agree
Useful CME which translates into my practice.
Adequate number of topics of interest.
Opportunities for interaction and networking
Presentations were relevant to my professional interest.
New perspectives and information will impact my practice.
Presentations were relevant to my to my personal development

* 2. Were the conference learning objectives met?

  Strongly Disagree Neither Agree or Disagree Strongly Agree
To examine, consider and appraise current and leading clinical practices to enhance patient care.
To explore innovation in health care as it relates to mental health.
To discuss and impart a deeper understanding of addictions psychiatry.

* 3. Please let us know if you perceived any commercial or other inappropriate bias.

* 4. Please provide us with recommendations for future speakers and/or topic areas that would be relevant to your practice.

* 5. Please rate the relevancy of this conference.

  Strongly Disagree Neither Agree or Disagree Strongly Agree
My learning objectives were met.
The conference challenged my thinking.
I gained new knowledge relevant to my practice.
I gained new skills.
The industry presentations are an important part of the meeting to me.
Overall the presentations, were of good quality.
Overall the presentations permitted and encouraged audience participation

* 6. Please identify and/or reflect on what you have learned and its impact on your practice.