CSIM Evaluation - Top Five Papers CSIM Evaluation FormYour feedback is invaluable and will help us plan future educational activities.Top Five Papers – Dr. Gabriel Huard· October 15, 12:00pm ET (first presentation)· October 15, 5:00pm ET (second presentation) Question Title * 1. Please rate this session as follows Poor Fair Satisfactory Good Excellent Scientific content of this presentation Scientific content of this presentation Poor Scientific content of this presentation Fair Scientific content of this presentation Satisfactory Scientific content of this presentation Good Scientific content of this presentation Excellent Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Poor Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Fair Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Satisfactory Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Good Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Excellent Adequate time for questions/discussion Adequate time for questions/discussion Poor Adequate time for questions/discussion Fair Adequate time for questions/discussion Satisfactory Adequate time for questions/discussion Good Adequate time for questions/discussion Excellent Speaker effectiveness Speaker effectiveness Poor Speaker effectiveness Fair Speaker effectiveness Satisfactory Speaker effectiveness Good Speaker effectiveness Excellent Virtual platform (Zoom) ease of use Virtual platform (Zoom) ease of use Poor Virtual platform (Zoom) ease of use Fair Virtual platform (Zoom) ease of use Satisfactory Virtual platform (Zoom) ease of use Good Virtual platform (Zoom) ease of use Excellent Length of session Length of session Poor Length of session Fair Length of session Satisfactory Length of session Good Length of session Excellent Comments Question Title * 2. Feedback on Zoom, technology, the virtual format, etc. Question Title * 3. Session objectives were met Not at all Partially Mostly Completely Identify and summarize the findings of five papers published in 2020 that are highly relevant to internists and general internists in Canada. Identify and summarize the findings of five papers published in 2020 that are highly relevant to internists and general internists in Canada. Not at all Identify and summarize the findings of five papers published in 2020 that are highly relevant to internists and general internists in Canada. Partially Identify and summarize the findings of five papers published in 2020 that are highly relevant to internists and general internists in Canada. Mostly Identify and summarize the findings of five papers published in 2020 that are highly relevant to internists and general internists in Canada. Completely Review the strengths and limitations of the papers using the principles of evidence-based medicine. Review the strengths and limitations of the papers using the principles of evidence-based medicine. Not at all Review the strengths and limitations of the papers using the principles of evidence-based medicine. Partially Review the strengths and limitations of the papers using the principles of evidence-based medicine. Mostly Review the strengths and limitations of the papers using the principles of evidence-based medicine. Completely Recognize the implications of these papers for one's own clinical practice. Recognize the implications of these papers for one's own clinical practice. Not at all Recognize the implications of these papers for one's own clinical practice. Partially Recognize the implications of these papers for one's own clinical practice. Mostly Recognize the implications of these papers for one's own clinical practice. Completely Question Title * 4. Bias and Balance Yes No Unsure The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced Yes The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced No The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced Unsure This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias Yes This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias No This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias Unsure This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias Yes This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias No This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias Unsure If you feel there were indicators of bias, please describe: (Note: Bias is defined as "a personal judgment in favor of a specific proprietary business interest or a commercial interest.") Question Title * 5. Reflection: What did you learn? What changes will you make to your practice? Is there anything you would like to learn more about? Question Title * 6. Which CanMEDS roles do you feel were addressed during this educational activity? Medical Expert Scholar Collaborator Health Advocate Communicator Leader Professional Question Title * 7. General Comments Question Title * 8. Topic suggestions for future sessions (please be as specific as possible) Thank you for your feedback.Visit www.csim.ca to view the list of educational sessions offered by CSIM. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook. Click here to submit your form