CSIM Evaluation - CSIM/Royal College Osler Lecture

CSIM Evaluation Form
Your feedback is invaluable and will help us plan future educational activities.

Unbundling Scientific Controversy: Musings on Science, Evidence, Advocacy... and Truth
CSIM/Royal College Osler Lecture – Dr. William Ghali
· October 7, 5:00pm ET (first presentation)
· October 8, 12:00pm ET (second presentation)

Question Title

* 1. Please rate this session as follows

	Poor	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Excellent
Scientific content of this presentation	Scientific content of this presentation Poor	Scientific content of this presentation Fair	Scientific content of this presentation Satisfactory	Scientific content of this presentation Good	Scientific content of this presentation Excellent
Usefulness/practicality of this presentation	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Poor	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Fair	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Satisfactory	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Good	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Excellent
Adequate time for questions/discussion	Adequate time for questions/discussion Poor	Adequate time for questions/discussion Fair	Adequate time for questions/discussion Satisfactory	Adequate time for questions/discussion Good	Adequate time for questions/discussion Excellent
Speaker effectiveness	Speaker effectiveness Poor	Speaker effectiveness Fair	Speaker effectiveness Satisfactory	Speaker effectiveness Good	Speaker effectiveness Excellent
Virtual platform (Zoom) ease of use	Virtual platform (Zoom) ease of use Poor	Virtual platform (Zoom) ease of use Fair	Virtual platform (Zoom) ease of use Satisfactory	Virtual platform (Zoom) ease of use Good	Virtual platform (Zoom) ease of use Excellent
Length of session	Length of session Poor	Length of session Fair	Length of session Satisfactory	Length of session Good	Length of session Excellent

Comments

Question Title

* 2. Feedback on Zoom, technology, the virtual format, etc.

Question Title

* 3. Session objectives were met

	Not at all	Partially	Mostly	Completely
Better understand epistemology, the domain of philosophy dedicated to studying the nature, origin, and limits of human knowledge.	Better understand epistemology, the domain of philosophy dedicated to studying the nature, origin, and limits of human knowledge. Not at all	Better understand epistemology, the domain of philosophy dedicated to studying the nature, origin, and limits of human knowledge. Partially	Better understand epistemology, the domain of philosophy dedicated to studying the nature, origin, and limits of human knowledge. Mostly	Better understand epistemology, the domain of philosophy dedicated to studying the nature, origin, and limits of human knowledge. Completely
Analyze current controversies in public health as case studies for considering distinctions between science, evidence, and advocacy, and how these relate to one another - and sometimes clash - in humankind's pursuit of truth.	Analyze current controversies in public health as case studies for considering distinctions between science, evidence, and advocacy, and how these relate to one another - and sometimes clash - in humankind's pursuit of truth. Not at all	Analyze current controversies in public health as case studies for considering distinctions between science, evidence, and advocacy, and how these relate to one another - and sometimes clash - in humankind's pursuit of truth. Partially	Analyze current controversies in public health as case studies for considering distinctions between science, evidence, and advocacy, and how these relate to one another - and sometimes clash - in humankind's pursuit of truth. Mostly	Analyze current controversies in public health as case studies for considering distinctions between science, evidence, and advocacy, and how these relate to one another - and sometimes clash - in humankind's pursuit of truth. Completely

Question Title

* 4. Bias and Balance

	Yes	No	Unsure
The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced	The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced Yes	The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced No	The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced Unsure
This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias Yes	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias No	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias Unsure
This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias Yes	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias No	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias Unsure

If you feel there were indicators of bias, please describe:
(Note: Bias is defined as "a personal judgment in favor of a specific proprietary business interest or a commercial interest.")

Question Title

* 5. Reflection: What did you learn? What changes will you make to your practice? Is there anything you would like to learn more about?

Question Title

* 6. Which CanMEDS roles do you feel were addressed during this educational activity?

Medical Expert

Scholar

Collaborator

Health Advocate

Communicator

Leader

Professional

Question Title

* 7. General Comments

Question Title

* 8. Topic suggestions for future sessions (please be as specific as possible)

Thank you for your feedback.

Visit www.csim.ca to view the list of educational sessions offered by CSIM.
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.