CSIM Evaluation Form 2018 - Strategies that Work for Early Palliation in Chronic Disease

CSIM Evaluation Form
Your feedback is invaluable and will help us improve the meeting and plan future educational activities.

Saturday, October 13, 2018
4. Strategies that Work for Early Palliation in Chronic Disease – Dr. Tara Lohmann, Dr. Jessica Simon, Dr. Michael Slawnych, Dr. Chandra Thomas

To thank you for completing these evaluation forms, we will hold a daily draw for a $25 Tim Hortons gift card. If you wish to enter, please indicate your name and email address. Winners will be announced on-site at the meeting and on social media.

Participation is optional; if you do not wish to participate, leave the following two fields blank.

One entry per session evaluated. Contact information will only be used for draw purposes. Survey responses are anonymous.

Question Title

* 1. Your Name

Question Title

* 2. Your Email Address

Question Title

* 3. Please rate this session as follows

	Poor	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Excellent
Scientific content of this presentation	Scientific content of this presentation Poor	Scientific content of this presentation Fair	Scientific content of this presentation Satisfactory	Scientific content of this presentation Good	Scientific content of this presentation Excellent
Usefulness/practicality of this presentation	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Poor	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Fair	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Satisfactory	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Good	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Excellent
Adequate time for questions/discussion	Adequate time for questions/discussion Poor	Adequate time for questions/discussion Fair	Adequate time for questions/discussion Satisfactory	Adequate time for questions/discussion Good	Adequate time for questions/discussion Excellent
Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Tara Lohmann	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Tara Lohmann Poor	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Tara Lohmann Fair	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Tara Lohmann Satisfactory	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Tara Lohmann Good	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Tara Lohmann Excellent
Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Jessica Simon	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Jessica Simon Poor	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Jessica Simon Fair	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Jessica Simon Satisfactory	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Jessica Simon Good	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Jessica Simon Excellent
Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Michael Slawnych	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Michael Slawnych Poor	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Michael Slawnych Fair	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Michael Slawnych Satisfactory	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Michael Slawnych Good	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Michael Slawnych Excellent
Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Chandra Thomas	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Chandra Thomas Poor	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Chandra Thomas Fair	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Chandra Thomas Satisfactory	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Chandra Thomas Good	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Chandra Thomas Excellent

Question Title

* 4. Session objectives were met

	Not at all	Partially	Mostly	Completely
Apply a rational approach to deprescribing medications and advanced interventions in persons with chronic disease in the last years of life.	Apply a rational approach to deprescribing medications and advanced interventions in persons with chronic disease in the last years of life. Not at all	Apply a rational approach to deprescribing medications and advanced interventions in persons with chronic disease in the last years of life. Partially	Apply a rational approach to deprescribing medications and advanced interventions in persons with chronic disease in the last years of life. Mostly	Apply a rational approach to deprescribing medications and advanced interventions in persons with chronic disease in the last years of life. Completely
Recognize the impact of prognostic uncertainty in delaying the provision of palliative care.	Recognize the impact of prognostic uncertainty in delaying the provision of palliative care. Not at all	Recognize the impact of prognostic uncertainty in delaying the provision of palliative care. Partially	Recognize the impact of prognostic uncertainty in delaying the provision of palliative care. Mostly	Recognize the impact of prognostic uncertainty in delaying the provision of palliative care. Completely
Employ strategies to overcome barriers in providing a palliative care approach.	Employ strategies to overcome barriers in providing a palliative care approach. Not at all	Employ strategies to overcome barriers in providing a palliative care approach. Partially	Employ strategies to overcome barriers in providing a palliative care approach. Mostly	Employ strategies to overcome barriers in providing a palliative care approach. Completely

Question Title

* 5. Which CanMEDS roles do you feel were addressed during this educational activity?

Medical Expert

Scholar

Collaborator

Health Advocate

Communicator

Leader

Professional

Question Title

* 6. Outcomes: As a result of attending this session, are you planning to

	Yes	No	Maybe
Discuss the session with your colleagues	Discuss the session with your colleagues Yes	Discuss the session with your colleagues No	Discuss the session with your colleagues Maybe
Pursue additional learning activities	Pursue additional learning activities Yes	Pursue additional learning activities No	Pursue additional learning activities Maybe
Complete a Personal Learning Project (PLP)	Complete a Personal Learning Project (PLP) Yes	Complete a Personal Learning Project (PLP) No	Complete a Personal Learning Project (PLP) Maybe

Question Title

* 7. What new information did you learn from this session?

Question Title

* 8. What changes will you make as a result?

Question Title

* 9. As part of its continuing professional development efforts, the CSIM would like to follow up with you in three months regarding potential impact this session had on your practice.

No, do not contact me.

Yes, CSIM may contact me as noted above – please indicate your name and email below:

Question Title

* 10. If you clicked "yes" above, please indicate your name and email address below:

First Name

Last Name

Question Title

* 11. Bias and Balance

	Yes	No	Unsure
The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced	The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced Yes	The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced No	The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced Unsure
This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias Yes	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias No	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias Unsure
This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias Yes	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias No	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias Unsure

If you feel there were indicators of bias, please describe:
(Note: Bias is defined as "a personal judgment in favor of a specific proprietary business interest or a commercial interest.")

Question Title

* 12. General Comments

Question Title

* 13. Topic suggestions for future conferences (please be as specific as possible)

An evaluation form for general conference feedback is available on the CSIM website and will also be emailed to you after the conference.

Thank you for your feedback.