CSIM Evaluation Form 2018 - GIM Faculty Research Showcase

CSIM Evaluation Form
Your feedback is invaluable and will help us improve the meeting and plan future educational activities.

Saturday, October 13, 2018
GIM Faculty Research Showcase
Simulated Geographical Co-location of Patients Admitted to an Inpatient Internal Medicine Teaching Unit: Potential Impacts on Efficiency and Physician-Nurse Communication – Dr. Andrew Appleton

Mortality and Morbidity in Acutely Ill Adults Treated with Liberal versus Conservative Oxygen Therapy (IOTA): Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis – Dr. John Neary

To thank you for completing these evaluation forms, we will hold a daily draw for a $25 Tim Hortons gift card. If you wish to enter, please indicate your name and email address. Winners will be announced on-site at the meeting and on social media.

Participation is optional; if you do not wish to participate, leave the following two fields blank.

One entry per session evaluated. Contact information will only be used for draw purposes. Survey responses are anonymous.

Question Title

* 1. Your Name

Question Title

* 2. Your Email Address

Question Title

* 3. Please rate this session as follows

	Poor	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Excellent
Scientific content of this presentation	Scientific content of this presentation Poor	Scientific content of this presentation Fair	Scientific content of this presentation Satisfactory	Scientific content of this presentation Good	Scientific content of this presentation Excellent
Usefulness/practicality of this presentation	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Poor	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Fair	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Satisfactory	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Good	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Excellent
Adequate time for questions/discussion	Adequate time for questions/discussion Poor	Adequate time for questions/discussion Fair	Adequate time for questions/discussion Satisfactory	Adequate time for questions/discussion Good	Adequate time for questions/discussion Excellent
Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Andrew Appleton	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Andrew Appleton Poor	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Andrew Appleton Fair	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Andrew Appleton Satisfactory	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Andrew Appleton Good	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Andrew Appleton Excellent
Speaker effectiveness - Dr. John Neary	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. John Neary Poor	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. John Neary Fair	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. John Neary Satisfactory	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. John Neary Good	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. John Neary Excellent

Question Title

* 4. Session objectives were met

	Not at all	Partially	Mostly	Completely
Simulated Geographical Co-location of Patients Admitted to an Inpatient Internal Medicine Teaching Unit	Simulated Geographical Co-location of Patients Admitted to an Inpatient Internal Medicine Teaching Unit Not at all	Simulated Geographical Co-location of Patients Admitted to an Inpatient Internal Medicine Teaching Unit Partially	Simulated Geographical Co-location of Patients Admitted to an Inpatient Internal Medicine Teaching Unit Mostly	Simulated Geographical Co-location of Patients Admitted to an Inpatient Internal Medicine Teaching Unit Completely
Mortality and Morbidity in Acutely Ill Adults Treated with Liberal versus Conservative Oxygen Therapy	Mortality and Morbidity in Acutely Ill Adults Treated with Liberal versus Conservative Oxygen Therapy Not at all	Mortality and Morbidity in Acutely Ill Adults Treated with Liberal versus Conservative Oxygen Therapy Partially	Mortality and Morbidity in Acutely Ill Adults Treated with Liberal versus Conservative Oxygen Therapy Mostly	Mortality and Morbidity in Acutely Ill Adults Treated with Liberal versus Conservative Oxygen Therapy Completely

Question Title

* 5. Which CanMEDS roles do you feel were addressed during this educational activity?

Medical Expert

Scholar

Collaborator

Health Advocate

Communicator

Leader

Professional

Question Title

* 6. Outcomes: As a result of attending this session, are you planning to

	Yes	No	Maybe
Discuss the session with your colleagues	Discuss the session with your colleagues Yes	Discuss the session with your colleagues No	Discuss the session with your colleagues Maybe
Pursue additional learning activities	Pursue additional learning activities Yes	Pursue additional learning activities No	Pursue additional learning activities Maybe
Complete a Personal Learning Project (PLP)	Complete a Personal Learning Project (PLP) Yes	Complete a Personal Learning Project (PLP) No	Complete a Personal Learning Project (PLP) Maybe

Question Title

* 7. What new information did you learn from this session?

Question Title

* 8. What changes will you make as a result?

Question Title

* 9. As part of its continuing professional development efforts, the CSIM would like to follow up with you in three months regarding potential impact this session had on your practice.

No, do not contact me.

Yes, CSIM may contact me as noted above – please indicate your name and email below:

Question Title

* 10. Bias and Balance

	Yes	No	Unsure
The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced	The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced Yes	The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced No	The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced Unsure
This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias Yes	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias No	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias Unsure
This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias Yes	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias No	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias Unsure

If you feel there were indicators of bias, please describe:
(Note: Bias is defined as "a personal judgment in favor of a specific proprietary business interest or a commercial interest.")

Question Title

* 11. General Comments

Question Title

* 12. Topic suggestions for future conferences (please be as specific as possible)

An evaluation form for general conference feedback is available on the CSIM website and will also be emailed to you after the conference.

Thank you for your feedback.