CSIM Evaluation Form 2018 - W10. Choosing Wisely / QI Implementation Hack-a-Thon

CSIM Evaluation Form
Your feedback is invaluable and will help us improve the meeting and plan future educational activities.

Thursday, October 11, 2018
W10. Choosing Wisely / QI Implementation Hack-a-Thon and Networking Session
Dr. Emily Gibson McDonald, Dr. Shannon Ruzycki, Dr. Timothy Chan

To thank you for completing these evaluation forms, we will hold a daily draw for a $25 Tim Hortons gift card. If you wish to enter, please indicate your name and email address. Winners will be announced on-site at the meeting and on social media.

Participation is optional; if you do not wish to participate, leave the following two fields blank.

One entry per session evaluated. Contact information will only be used for draw purposes. Survey responses are anonymous.

Question Title

* 1. Your Name

Question Title

* 2. Your Email Address

Question Title

* 3. Please rate this session as follows

	Poor	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Excellent
Scientific content of this presentation	Scientific content of this presentation Poor	Scientific content of this presentation Fair	Scientific content of this presentation Satisfactory	Scientific content of this presentation Good	Scientific content of this presentation Excellent
Usefulness/practicality of this presentation	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Poor	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Fair	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Satisfactory	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Good	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Excellent
Adequate time for questions/discussion	Adequate time for questions/discussion Poor	Adequate time for questions/discussion Fair	Adequate time for questions/discussion Satisfactory	Adequate time for questions/discussion Good	Adequate time for questions/discussion Excellent
Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Emily Gibson McDonald	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Emily Gibson McDonald Poor	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Emily Gibson McDonald Fair	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Emily Gibson McDonald Satisfactory	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Emily Gibson McDonald Good	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Emily Gibson McDonald Excellent
Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Shannon Ruzycki	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Shannon Ruzycki Poor	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Shannon Ruzycki Fair	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Shannon Ruzycki Satisfactory	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Shannon Ruzycki Good	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Shannon Ruzycki Excellent
Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Timothy Chan	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Timothy Chan Poor	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Timothy Chan Fair	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Timothy Chan Satisfactory	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Timothy Chan Good	Speaker effectiveness - Dr. Timothy Chan Excellent

Question Title

* 4. Session objectives were met

	Not at all	Partially	Mostly	Completely
Critically evaluate Choosing Wisely and QI initiatives.	Critically evaluate Choosing Wisely and QI initiatives. Not at all	Critically evaluate Choosing Wisely and QI initiatives. Partially	Critically evaluate Choosing Wisely and QI initiatives. Mostly	Critically evaluate Choosing Wisely and QI initiatives. Completely
Create an implementation plan and anticipate and troubleshoot potential challenges.	Create an implementation plan and anticipate and troubleshoot potential challenges. Not at all	Create an implementation plan and anticipate and troubleshoot potential challenges. Partially	Create an implementation plan and anticipate and troubleshoot potential challenges. Mostly	Create an implementation plan and anticipate and troubleshoot potential challenges. Completely
Implement one Choosing Wisely recommendation related to safe opioid prescribing.	Implement one Choosing Wisely recommendation related to safe opioid prescribing. Not at all	Implement one Choosing Wisely recommendation related to safe opioid prescribing. Partially	Implement one Choosing Wisely recommendation related to safe opioid prescribing. Mostly	Implement one Choosing Wisely recommendation related to safe opioid prescribing. Completely
Create a project with a Canada-wide network.	Create a project with a Canada-wide network. Not at all	Create a project with a Canada-wide network. Partially	Create a project with a Canada-wide network. Mostly	Create a project with a Canada-wide network. Completely
Share feedback and learn from peers on new initiatives and projects in GIM research, Choosing Wisely, QI.	Share feedback and learn from peers on new initiatives and projects in GIM research, Choosing Wisely, QI. Not at all	Share feedback and learn from peers on new initiatives and projects in GIM research, Choosing Wisely, QI. Partially	Share feedback and learn from peers on new initiatives and projects in GIM research, Choosing Wisely, QI. Mostly	Share feedback and learn from peers on new initiatives and projects in GIM research, Choosing Wisely, QI. Completely

Question Title

* 5. Which CanMEDS roles do you feel were addressed during this educational activity?

Medical Expert

Scholar

Collaborator

Health Advocate

Communicator

Leader

Professional

Question Title

* 6. Outcomes: As a result of attending this session, are you planning to

	Yes	No	Maybe
Discuss the session with your colleagues	Discuss the session with your colleagues Yes	Discuss the session with your colleagues No	Discuss the session with your colleagues Maybe
Pursue additional learning activities	Pursue additional learning activities Yes	Pursue additional learning activities No	Pursue additional learning activities Maybe
Complete a Personal Learning Project (PLP)	Complete a Personal Learning Project (PLP) Yes	Complete a Personal Learning Project (PLP) No	Complete a Personal Learning Project (PLP) Maybe

Question Title

* 7. What new information did you learn from this session?

Question Title

* 8. What changes will you make as a result?

Question Title

* 9. As part of its continuing professional development efforts, the CSIM would like to follow up with you in three months regarding potential impact this session had on your practice.

No, do not contact me.

Yes, CSIM may contact me as noted above – please indicate your name and email below:

Question Title

* 10. Bias and Balance

	Yes	No	Unsure
The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced	The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced Yes	The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced No	The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced Unsure
This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias Yes	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias No	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias Unsure
This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias Yes	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias No	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias Unsure

If you feel there were indicators of bias, please describe:
(Note: Bias is defined as "a personal judgment in favor of a specific proprietary business interest or a commercial interest.")

Question Title

* 11. General Comments

Question Title

* 12. Topic suggestions for future conferences (please be as specific as possible)

An evaluation form for general conference feedback is available on the CSIM website and will also be emailed to you after the conference.

Thank you for your feedback.