CSIM Evaluation Form 2018 - Top Five Papers Plenary

CSIM Evaluation Form
Your feedback is invaluable and will help us improve the meeting and plan future educational activities.

Thursday, October 11
TOP FIVE PAPERS – Dr. Gabriel Fabreau

To thank you for completing these evaluation forms, we will hold a daily draw for a $25 Tim Hortons gift card. If you wish to enter, please indicate your name and email address. Winners will be announced on-site at the meeting and on social media.

Participation is optional; if you do not wish to participate, leave the following two fields blank.

One entry per session evaluated. Contact information will only be used for draw purposes. Survey responses are anonymous.

Question Title

* 1. Your Name

Question Title

* 2. Your Email Address

Question Title

* 3. Please rate this session as follows

	Poor	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Excellent
Scientific content of this presentation	Scientific content of this presentation Poor	Scientific content of this presentation Fair	Scientific content of this presentation Satisfactory	Scientific content of this presentation Good	Scientific content of this presentation Excellent
Usefulness/practicality of this presentation	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Poor	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Fair	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Satisfactory	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Good	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Excellent
Adequate time for questions/discussion	Adequate time for questions/discussion Poor	Adequate time for questions/discussion Fair	Adequate time for questions/discussion Satisfactory	Adequate time for questions/discussion Good	Adequate time for questions/discussion Excellent
Speaker effectiveness	Speaker effectiveness Poor	Speaker effectiveness Fair	Speaker effectiveness Satisfactory	Speaker effectiveness Good	Speaker effectiveness Excellent

Question Title

* 4. Session objectives were met

	Not at all	Partially	Mostly	Completely
Identify and summarize the findings of five papers published in 2018 that are highly relevant to internists and general internists in Canada.	Identify and summarize the findings of five papers published in 2018 that are highly relevant to internists and general internists in Canada. Not at all	Identify and summarize the findings of five papers published in 2018 that are highly relevant to internists and general internists in Canada. Partially	Identify and summarize the findings of five papers published in 2018 that are highly relevant to internists and general internists in Canada. Mostly	Identify and summarize the findings of five papers published in 2018 that are highly relevant to internists and general internists in Canada. Completely
Review the strengths and limitations of the papers using the principles of evidence-based medicine.	Review the strengths and limitations of the papers using the principles of evidence-based medicine. Not at all	Review the strengths and limitations of the papers using the principles of evidence-based medicine. Partially	Review the strengths and limitations of the papers using the principles of evidence-based medicine. Mostly	Review the strengths and limitations of the papers using the principles of evidence-based medicine. Completely
Recognize the implications of these papers for one's own clinical practice.	Recognize the implications of these papers for one's own clinical practice. Not at all	Recognize the implications of these papers for one's own clinical practice. Partially	Recognize the implications of these papers for one's own clinical practice. Mostly	Recognize the implications of these papers for one's own clinical practice. Completely

Question Title

* 5. Which CanMEDS roles do you feel were addressed during this educational activity?

Medical Expert

Scholar

Collaborator

Health Advocate

Communicator

Leader

Professional

Question Title

* 6. Outcomes: As a result of attending this session, are you planning to

	Yes	No	Maybe
Discuss the session with your colleagues	Discuss the session with your colleagues Yes	Discuss the session with your colleagues No	Discuss the session with your colleagues Maybe
Pursue additional learning activities	Pursue additional learning activities Yes	Pursue additional learning activities No	Pursue additional learning activities Maybe
Complete a Personal Learning Project (PLP)	Complete a Personal Learning Project (PLP) Yes	Complete a Personal Learning Project (PLP) No	Complete a Personal Learning Project (PLP) Maybe

Question Title

* 7. What new information did you learn from this session?

Question Title

* 8. What changes will you make as a result?

Question Title

* 9. As part of its continuing professional development efforts, the CSIM would like to follow up with you in three months regarding potential impact this session had on your practice.

No, do not contact me.

Yes, CSIM may contact me as noted above – please indicate your name and email below:

Question Title

* 10. Bias and Balance

	Yes	No	Unsure
The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced	The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced Yes	The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced No	The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced Unsure
This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias Yes	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias No	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias Unsure
This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias Yes	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias No	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias Unsure

If you feel there were indicators of bias, please describe:
(Note: Bias is defined as "a personal judgment in favor of a specific proprietary business interest or a commercial interest.")

Question Title

* 11. General Comments

Question Title

* 12. Topic suggestions for future conferences (please be as specific as possible)

An evaluation form for general conference feedback is available on the CSIM website and will also be emailed to you after the conference.

Thank you for your feedback.