CSIM Evaluation - Healthcare Quality Improvement Workshop

CSIM Evaluation Form - Healthcare Quality Improvement Workshop

Your feedback is invaluable and will help us improve the meeting and plan future educational activities.

Wednesday, November 1, 2017
Extended Workshops - 1300 - 1630

III)  Healthcare Quality Improvement Workshop
Dr. Tom MacMillan - Overview of QI Methods/Stats
Objectives:
·     Recognize various formats to guide rapid cycle improvement
·     Generate appropriate quality indicators and metrics for QI projects
·     Choose and apply methods to identify targets for improvement initiatives
·     Summarize the utility of statistical control charts in improvement projects

Dr. David Frost - Achieving Multidisciplinary QI in a Healthcare Institution
Objectives:
·     Identify principles of change management relevant to QI projects
·     Apply QI methods and tools in the clinical environment
·     Identify real world challenges that arise in the pursuit of improvement

Dr. Peter Wu - How to Think Critically About QI Projects
Objectives:
·     Describe common problems encountered in QI projects
·     Appraise a QI project

To thank you for completing these evaluation forms, we will hold a daily draw for a $25 Starbucks gift card. If you wish to enter, please indicate your name and email address. Winners will be announced on-site at the meeting and on social media.

Participation is optional; if you do not wish to participate, leave the following two fields blank.

One entry per session evaluated. Contact information will only be used for draw purposes. Survey responses are anonymous.

Question Title

* 1. Your Name

Question Title

* 2. Your Email Address

Question Title

* 3. Please rate this session as follows

	Poor	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Excellent
Scientific content of this presentation	Scientific content of this presentation Poor	Scientific content of this presentation Fair	Scientific content of this presentation Satisfactory	Scientific content of this presentation Good	Scientific content of this presentation Excellent
Usefulness/practicality of this presentation	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Poor	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Fair	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Satisfactory	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Good	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Excellent
Adequate time for questions/discussion	Adequate time for questions/discussion Poor	Adequate time for questions/discussion Fair	Adequate time for questions/discussion Satisfactory	Adequate time for questions/discussion Good	Adequate time for questions/discussion Excellent
Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Tom MacMillan	Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Tom MacMillan Poor	Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Tom MacMillan Fair	Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Tom MacMillan Satisfactory	Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Tom MacMillan Good	Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Tom MacMillan Excellent
Speaker effectiveness: Dr. David Frost	Speaker effectiveness: Dr. David Frost Poor	Speaker effectiveness: Dr. David Frost Fair	Speaker effectiveness: Dr. David Frost Satisfactory	Speaker effectiveness: Dr. David Frost Good	Speaker effectiveness: Dr. David Frost Excellent
Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Peter Wu	Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Peter Wu Poor	Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Peter Wu Fair	Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Peter Wu Satisfactory	Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Peter Wu Good	Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Peter Wu Excellent

Question Title

* 4. Session objectives were met

	Not at all	Partially	Mostly	Completely
Overview of QI Methods/Stats	Overview of QI Methods/Stats Not at all	Overview of QI Methods/Stats Partially	Overview of QI Methods/Stats Mostly	Overview of QI Methods/Stats Completely
Achieving Multidisciplinary QI in a Healthcare Institution	Achieving Multidisciplinary QI in a Healthcare Institution Not at all	Achieving Multidisciplinary QI in a Healthcare Institution Partially	Achieving Multidisciplinary QI in a Healthcare Institution Mostly	Achieving Multidisciplinary QI in a Healthcare Institution Completely
How to Think Critically About QI Projects	How to Think Critically About QI Projects Not at all	How to Think Critically About QI Projects Partially	How to Think Critically About QI Projects Mostly	How to Think Critically About QI Projects Completely

Question Title

* 5. Outcomes: As a result of attending this session, are you planning to

	Yes	No	Maybe
Discuss the session with your colleagues	Discuss the session with your colleagues Yes	Discuss the session with your colleagues No	Discuss the session with your colleagues Maybe
Pursue additional learning activities	Pursue additional learning activities Yes	Pursue additional learning activities No	Pursue additional learning activities Maybe
Complete a Personal Learning Project (PLP)	Complete a Personal Learning Project (PLP) Yes	Complete a Personal Learning Project (PLP) No	Complete a Personal Learning Project (PLP) Maybe

What new information did you learn from this session; what changes will you make as a result?

Question Title

* 6. Bias and Balance

	Yes	No	Unsure
The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced	The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced Yes	The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced No	The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced Unsure
This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias Yes	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias No	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias Unsure
This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias Yes	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias No	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias Unsure

If you feel there were indicators of bias, please describe:
(Note: Bias is defined as "a personal judgment in favor of a specific proprietary business interest or a commercial interest.")

Question Title

* 7. General Comments

Question Title

* 8. Topic suggestions for future conferences (please be as specific as possible)

Question Title

* 9. Feedback

Check here if you would like someone to contact you about your feedback.

If yes, please provide your email address

An evaluation form for general conference feedback is available on the CSIM website and will also be emailed to you after the conference.

Thank you for your feedback.