CSIM Evaluation - Critical Care Update

CSIM Evaluation Form - Critical Care Update

Your feedback is invaluable and will help us improve the meeting and plan future educational activities.

Wednesday, November 1, 2017
Extended Workshops - 1300 - 1630
Dr. Shelly Dev and Dr. Natalie Wong

IV) Critical Care Update
Update on Sepsis
Objectives:
·     Develop a diagnostic approach to sepsis and understand the role of various scoring systems
·     Apply evidence-based management strategies for sepsis including vasopressors and goal-directed therapy
·     Discuss the risk factors and implications of hospital-acquired infections

Update on Respiratory Failure
Objectives:
·     Differentiate between the different types of respiratory failure
·     Explain the roles and rationale for different non-invasive ventilator strategies for patients with respiratory failure
·     Discuss the impact an ICU stay has on the quality of life of patients once they are transferred to the ward and beyond

Update on Cardiac Arrest Management
Objectives:
·     Review the rationale for the most recent cardiac arrest guidelines
·     Apply these guidelines to cardiac arrest management
·     Devise an approach to prognosticate patients following a cardiac arrest and be able to describe the criteria for brain death

To thank you for completing these evaluation forms, we will hold a daily draw for a $25 Starbucks gift card. If you wish to enter, please indicate your name and email address. Winners will be announced on-site at the meeting and on social media.

Participation is optional; if you do not wish to participate, leave the following two fields blank.

One entry per session evaluated. Contact information will only be used for draw purposes. Survey responses are anonymous.

Question Title

* 1. Your Name

Question Title

* 2. Your Email Address

Question Title

* 3. Please rate this session as follows

	Poor	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Excellent
Scientific content of this presentation	Scientific content of this presentation Poor	Scientific content of this presentation Fair	Scientific content of this presentation Satisfactory	Scientific content of this presentation Good	Scientific content of this presentation Excellent
Usefulness/practicality of this presentation	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Poor	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Fair	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Satisfactory	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Good	Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Excellent
Adequate time for questions/discussion	Adequate time for questions/discussion Poor	Adequate time for questions/discussion Fair	Adequate time for questions/discussion Satisfactory	Adequate time for questions/discussion Good	Adequate time for questions/discussion Excellent
Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Shelly Dev	Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Shelly Dev Poor	Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Shelly Dev Fair	Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Shelly Dev Satisfactory	Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Shelly Dev Good	Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Shelly Dev Excellent
Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Natalie Wong	Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Natalie Wong Poor	Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Natalie Wong Fair	Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Natalie Wong Satisfactory	Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Natalie Wong Good	Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Natalie Wong Excellent

Question Title

* 4. Session objectives were met

	Not at all	Partially	Mostly	Completely
Update on Sepsis	Update on Sepsis Not at all	Update on Sepsis Partially	Update on Sepsis Mostly	Update on Sepsis Completely
Update on Respiratory Failure	Update on Respiratory Failure Not at all	Update on Respiratory Failure Partially	Update on Respiratory Failure Mostly	Update on Respiratory Failure Completely
Update on Cardiac Arrest Management	Update on Cardiac Arrest Management Not at all	Update on Cardiac Arrest Management Partially	Update on Cardiac Arrest Management Mostly	Update on Cardiac Arrest Management Completely

Question Title

* 5. Outcomes: As a result of attending this session, are you planning to

	Yes	No	Maybe
Discuss the session with your colleagues	Discuss the session with your colleagues Yes	Discuss the session with your colleagues No	Discuss the session with your colleagues Maybe
Pursue additional learning activities	Pursue additional learning activities Yes	Pursue additional learning activities No	Pursue additional learning activities Maybe
Complete a Personal Learning Project (PLP)	Complete a Personal Learning Project (PLP) Yes	Complete a Personal Learning Project (PLP) No	Complete a Personal Learning Project (PLP) Maybe

What new information did you learn from this session; what changes will you make as a result?

Question Title

* 6. Bias and Balance

	Yes	No	Unsure
The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced	The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced Yes	The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced No	The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced Unsure
This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias Yes	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias No	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias Unsure
This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias Yes	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias No	This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias Unsure

If you feel there were indicators of bias, please describe:
(Note: Bias is defined as "a personal judgment in favor of a specific proprietary business interest or a commercial interest.")

Question Title

* 7. General Comments

Question Title

* 8. Topic suggestions for future conferences (please be as specific as possible)

Question Title

* 9. Feedback

Check here if you would like someone to contact you about your feedback.

If yes, please provide your email address

An evaluation form for general conference feedback is available on the CSIM website and will also be emailed to you after the conference.

Thank you for your feedback.