Skip to content
ASES 2023 Fellows' Day
Friday, June 16th, 2023
1.
Your overall impression of the ASES 2023 Fellows' Day was:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
2.
How would you rate the ASES Membership: Categories and Advancement session presented by Michael H. Amini, MD?
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Other (please specify)
3.
How would you rate Keynote Speaker #1: Richard J. Hawkins, MD, FRSC?
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Other (please specify)
4.
How would you rate Keynote Speaker #2: Steven S. Burkhart, MD?
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Other (please specify)
5.
How would you rate Keynote Speaker #3: Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, MD, PhD?
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Other (please specify)
6.
How would you rate Symposium I: I'm Done with Fellowship, Now What? The Business of Starting A Practice
Moderated by Anand M. Murthi, MD with a panel discussion including Brian R. Waterman, MD, Grant E. Garrigues, MD, Julia Lee, MD, Rachel M. Frank, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
7.
How would you rate Symposium II: Fractures - How to Handle the Cases My Partners Will Save Just for Me
Moderated by Michael H. Amini, MD and Justin W. Griffin, MD with a panel discussion including Oke A. Anakwenze, MD, MBA, Emilie V. Cheung, MD, Caroline M. Chebli, MD, Michael J. O'Brien, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
Podium Presentations
8.
Paper #1: Predictors of Poor and Excellent Outcomes Following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis with Intact Rotator Cuff
The overall quality of paper #1 presented by Abdulaziz Ahmed, MD, was:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
9.
Paper #2: High failure rate of two-stage revision for the infected total elbow arthroplasty: A single institution's experience
The overall quality of paper #2 presented by Corey Schiffman, MD, was:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
10.
Paper #3: Glenoid Based Reference System to Differentiate Shoulder Pathologies on Plain Radiographs
The overall quality of paper #3 presented by Austin Smith, MD, was:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
11.
Paper #4: Pain Generation in the Contralateral Asymptomatic Shoulder in Patients with a Painful Cuff Tear: A Prospective, Longitudinal Cohort Study
The overall quality of paper #4 presented by Jeffrey Olson, MD was:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
12.
Paper #5: Inferior Craniocaudal Hill-Sachs Extension is Associated with Recurrent Instability Following Primary Arthroscopic Bankart Repair
The overall quality of paper #5 presented by Ting Cong, MD, was:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
13.
Paper #6: The Relationship Between Patient Resilience and Mental Health Status In Patients Undergoing Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty
The overall quality of paper #6 presented by James Levins, MD, was:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
14.
Paper #7: Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty With a Modular Segmental Metallic “Tumor” Prosthesis For Severe Proximal Humerus Bone Loss
The overall quality of paper #7 presented by Joseph Labrum, MD was:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
15.
Paper #8: How Anatomic Should Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Be?
The overall quality of paper #8 presented by Ryan Hoffman, MD was:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
16.
Paper #9: No Difference in 10-Year Survivorship of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Hemiarthroplasty for Avascular Necrosis of the Humeral Head
The overall quality of paper #9 presented by Joshua Thomas, MD was:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
17.
Paper #10: Up To 8 Mm Of Glenoid-Sided Lateralization Does Not Increase The Risk Of Acromial Or Scapular Spine Stress Fracture Following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty With A 135° Humeral Component
The overall quality of paper #10 presented by Theresa Pak, MD was:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments: