Life on State - Final Plan input

Please share your review of the Life on State Plan recommendations.

The plan is the first step toward changing zoning, funding and building improvements, and working toward better mobility. Your responses help us understand if the plan meets your expectations and how we can best fulfill the vision for Life on State moving forward.

This questionnaire has ten questions and should take about 10 minutes to complete. You will review drawings, maps and results and then respond. It may be helpful to read the Plan or Executive Summary online first for better page formatting, and to explore the ideas more.

If you wish to send a general comment or question, visit us at lifeonstate.com

Question Title

* 1. What are your priorities for the Life on State study area? (please rank)

	The least important	A little important	Average importance	Very important	The most important
Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars.	Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars. The least important	Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars. A little important	Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars. Average importance	Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars. Very important	Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars. The most important
Adding more trees, trails and open space.	Adding more trees, trails and open space. The least important	Adding more trees, trails and open space. A little important	Adding more trees, trails and open space. Average importance	Adding more trees, trails and open space. Very important	Adding more trees, trails and open space. The most important
Improving public transit.	Improving public transit. The least important	Improving public transit. A little important	Improving public transit. Average importance	Improving public transit. Very important	Improving public transit. The most important
Adding housing to the neighborhood.	Adding housing to the neighborhood. The least important	Adding housing to the neighborhood. A little important	Adding housing to the neighborhood. Average importance	Adding housing to the neighborhood. Very important	Adding housing to the neighborhood. The most important
Minimizing driving delay and congestion	Minimizing driving delay and congestion The least important	Minimizing driving delay and congestion A little important	Minimizing driving delay and congestion Average importance	Minimizing driving delay and congestion Very important	Minimizing driving delay and congestion The most important

Question Title

* 2.
The Land Use Scenarios and Street Design Options show a range of future changes possible. The four options reflect likely development and shifts in character with each degree of change and investment. Click here if you wish to open the scenario/graphics graphics in a new window.

Please rate how you think each scenario/concept achieves the goals of Life on State.

Concept 1 (Business as Usual) includes:
- No change to roadway conditions.
- City zoning and development regulations remain unchanged, favoring lower densities and commercial buildings.
- Minimal growth and development outside of SLC and SSL downtown.

	No improvement	Modest improvement	Vast improvement	Goes too far (too extreme)
Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars	Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars No improvement	Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars Modest improvement	Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars Vast improvement	Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars Goes too far (too extreme)
Adding more trees, trails and open space	Adding more trees, trails and open space No improvement	Adding more trees, trails and open space Modest improvement	Adding more trees, trails and open space Vast improvement	Adding more trees, trails and open space Goes too far (too extreme)
Improving public transit	Improving public transit No improvement	Improving public transit Modest improvement	Improving public transit Vast improvement	Improving public transit Goes too far (too extreme)
Adding housing to the neighborhood	Adding housing to the neighborhood No improvement	Adding housing to the neighborhood Modest improvement	Adding housing to the neighborhood Vast improvement	Adding housing to the neighborhood Goes too far (too extreme)
Minimizing driving delays	Minimizing driving delays No improvement	Minimizing driving delays Modest improvement	Minimizing driving delays Vast improvement	Minimizing driving delays Goes too far (too extreme)

Comments

Question Title

* 3.
How well do you think CONCEPT 2 achieves the goals of Life on State?

Concept 2 includes:
- New landscaped medians and street trees.
- New city regulations that favor compact, urban development, including housing and mixed-use.
- High-density development concentrated in downtown area.
- Little to attract developers of high-density, high-investment projects.

	No improvement	Modest improvement	Vast improvement	Goes too far (too extreme)
Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars.	Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars. No improvement	Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars. Modest improvement	Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars. Vast improvement	Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars. Goes too far (too extreme)
Adding more trees, trails and open space.	Adding more trees, trails and open space. No improvement	Adding more trees, trails and open space. Modest improvement	Adding more trees, trails and open space. Vast improvement	Adding more trees, trails and open space. Goes too far (too extreme)
Improving public transit	Improving public transit No improvement	Improving public transit Modest improvement	Improving public transit Vast improvement	Improving public transit Goes too far (too extreme)
Adding housing to the neighborhood	Adding housing to the neighborhood No improvement	Adding housing to the neighborhood Modest improvement	Adding housing to the neighborhood Vast improvement	Adding housing to the neighborhood Goes too far (too extreme)
Minimizing driving delays	Minimizing driving delays No improvement	Minimizing driving delays Modest improvement	Minimizing driving delays Vast improvement	Minimizing driving delays Goes too far (too extreme)

Comments

Question Title

* 4.
How well do you think CONCEPT 3 achieves the goals of Lifeon State?

Concept 3 includes:
- New landscaped medians and street trees.
- Upgraded transit facilities
- Wider sidewalks
- New city regulations that favor compact, urban development, including housing and mixed-use.
- High-density development concentrated in downtown area.
- Increased appeal to developers of high-density, high-investment commercial projects.

	No improvement	Modest improvement	Vast improvement	Goes too far (too extreme)
Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars.	Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars. No improvement	Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars. Modest improvement	Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars. Vast improvement	Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars. Goes too far (too extreme)
Adding more trees, trails and open space.	Adding more trees, trails and open space. No improvement	Adding more trees, trails and open space. Modest improvement	Adding more trees, trails and open space. Vast improvement	Adding more trees, trails and open space. Goes too far (too extreme)
Improving public transit	Improving public transit No improvement	Improving public transit Modest improvement	Improving public transit Vast improvement	Improving public transit Goes too far (too extreme)
Adding housing to the neighborhood.	Adding housing to the neighborhood. No improvement	Adding housing to the neighborhood. Modest improvement	Adding housing to the neighborhood. Vast improvement	Adding housing to the neighborhood. Goes too far (too extreme)
Minimizing driving delays	Minimizing driving delays No improvement	Minimizing driving delays Modest improvement	Minimizing driving delays Vast improvement	Minimizing driving delays Goes too far (too extreme)

Comments?

Question Title

* 5. How well do you think CONCEPT 4 (either variation)achieves the goals of Life on State?
Concept 4 includes:
- New landscaped medians and street trees.
- A curbside priority lanes for parking and transit, possibly separated from through traffic by a landscaped median.
- Upgraded transit facilities
- Wider sidewalks or a protected bike lane
- New city regulations that favor compact, urban development, including housing and mixed-use.
- High-density development concentrated in downtown area.
- Appeal to developers of high-density, high-investment mixed use and housing projects.

	No improvement	A little improvement	Modest improvement	Vast improvement	Goes too far (too extreme)
Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars.	Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars. No improvement	Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars. A little improvement	Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars. Modest improvement	Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars. Vast improvement	Making the street safer for walkers, bikers and cars. Goes too far (too extreme)
Adding more trees, trails and open space.	Adding more trees, trails and open space. No improvement	Adding more trees, trails and open space. A little improvement	Adding more trees, trails and open space. Modest improvement	Adding more trees, trails and open space. Vast improvement	Adding more trees, trails and open space. Goes too far (too extreme)
Improving public transit.	Improving public transit. No improvement	Improving public transit. A little improvement	Improving public transit. Modest improvement	Improving public transit. Vast improvement	Improving public transit. Goes too far (too extreme)
Adding housing to the neighborhood.	Adding housing to the neighborhood. No improvement	Adding housing to the neighborhood. A little improvement	Adding housing to the neighborhood. Modest improvement	Adding housing to the neighborhood. Vast improvement	Adding housing to the neighborhood. Goes too far (too extreme)
Minimizing driving delays	Minimizing driving delays No improvement	Minimizing driving delays A little improvement	Minimizing driving delays Modest improvement	Minimizing driving delays Vast improvement	Minimizing driving delays Goes too far (too extreme)

Comments:

Question Title

* 6. The Catalytic Sites show how different design strategies could improve the street and neighborhood. These are locations where redevelopment is likely and changes could make the greatest immediate impact. Click here to open a new window to see the site plans and visualizations together.

Please rate how you think each Catalytic Site achieves the Life on State goals.
Site 1

	One star (the worst)	Two stars	Three stars	Four stars	Five stars (the best)
Improve Safety and Security	Improve Safety and Security One star (the worst)	Improve Safety and Security Two stars	Improve Safety and Security Three stars	Improve Safety and Security Four stars	Improve Safety and Security Five stars (the best)
Improve Identity of Place	Improve Identity of Place One star (the worst)	Improve Identity of Place Two stars	Improve Identity of Place Three stars	Improve Identity of Place Four stars	Improve Identity of Place Five stars (the best)
Expand Connectivity	Expand Connectivity One star (the worst)	Expand Connectivity Two stars	Expand Connectivity Three stars	Expand Connectivity Four stars	Expand Connectivity Five stars (the best)
Optimize Mobility	Optimize Mobility One star (the worst)	Optimize Mobility Two stars	Optimize Mobility Three stars	Optimize Mobility Four stars	Optimize Mobility Five stars (the best)
Drive Economic Prosperity	Drive Economic Prosperity One star (the worst)	Drive Economic Prosperity Two stars	Drive Economic Prosperity Three stars	Drive Economic Prosperity Four stars	Drive Economic Prosperity Five stars (the best)
Support Equitable Living Opportunities	Support Equitable Living Opportunities One star (the worst)	Support Equitable Living Opportunities Two stars	Support Equitable Living Opportunities Three stars	Support Equitable Living Opportunities Four stars	Support Equitable Living Opportunities Five stars (the best)
Encourage Healthy & Sustainable Living	Encourage Healthy & Sustainable Living One star (the worst)	Encourage Healthy & Sustainable Living Two stars	Encourage Healthy & Sustainable Living Three stars	Encourage Healthy & Sustainable Living Four stars	Encourage Healthy & Sustainable Living Five stars (the best)

Comments:

Question Title

* 7. How well does Site 2 achieve the Life on State goals?

	One star (the worst)	Two stars	Three stars	Four stars	Five stars (the best)
Improve Safety and Security	Improve Safety and Security One star (the worst)	Improve Safety and Security Two stars	Improve Safety and Security Three stars	Improve Safety and Security Four stars	Improve Safety and Security Five stars (the best)
Improve Identity of Place	Improve Identity of Place One star (the worst)	Improve Identity of Place Two stars	Improve Identity of Place Three stars	Improve Identity of Place Four stars	Improve Identity of Place Five stars (the best)
Expand Connectivity	Expand Connectivity One star (the worst)	Expand Connectivity Two stars	Expand Connectivity Three stars	Expand Connectivity Four stars	Expand Connectivity Five stars (the best)
Optimize Mobility	Optimize Mobility One star (the worst)	Optimize Mobility Two stars	Optimize Mobility Three stars	Optimize Mobility Four stars	Optimize Mobility Five stars (the best)
Drive Economic Prosperity	Drive Economic Prosperity One star (the worst)	Drive Economic Prosperity Two stars	Drive Economic Prosperity Three stars	Drive Economic Prosperity Four stars	Drive Economic Prosperity Five stars (the best)
Support Equitable Living Opportunities	Support Equitable Living Opportunities One star (the worst)	Support Equitable Living Opportunities Two stars	Support Equitable Living Opportunities Three stars	Support Equitable Living Opportunities Four stars	Support Equitable Living Opportunities Five stars (the best)
Encourage Healthy & Sustainable Living	Encourage Healthy & Sustainable Living One star (the worst)	Encourage Healthy & Sustainable Living Two stars	Encourage Healthy & Sustainable Living Three stars	Encourage Healthy & Sustainable Living Four stars	Encourage Healthy & Sustainable Living Five stars (the best)

Comments:

Question Title

* 8. How well does Site 3 achieve the Life on State goals?

	One star (the worst)	Two stars	Three stars	Four stars	Five stars (the best)
Improve Safety and Security	Improve Safety and Security One star (the worst)	Improve Safety and Security Two stars	Improve Safety and Security Three stars	Improve Safety and Security Four stars	Improve Safety and Security Five stars (the best)
Improve Identity of Place	Improve Identity of Place One star (the worst)	Improve Identity of Place Two stars	Improve Identity of Place Three stars	Improve Identity of Place Four stars	Improve Identity of Place Five stars (the best)
Expand Connectivity	Expand Connectivity One star (the worst)	Expand Connectivity Two stars	Expand Connectivity Three stars	Expand Connectivity Four stars	Expand Connectivity Five stars (the best)
Optimize Mobility	Optimize Mobility One star (the worst)	Optimize Mobility Two stars	Optimize Mobility Three stars	Optimize Mobility Four stars	Optimize Mobility Five stars (the best)
Drive Economic Prosperity	Drive Economic Prosperity One star (the worst)	Drive Economic Prosperity Two stars	Drive Economic Prosperity Three stars	Drive Economic Prosperity Four stars	Drive Economic Prosperity Five stars (the best)
Support Equitable Living Opportunities	Support Equitable Living Opportunities One star (the worst)	Support Equitable Living Opportunities Two stars	Support Equitable Living Opportunities Three stars	Support Equitable Living Opportunities Four stars	Support Equitable Living Opportunities Five stars (the best)
Encourage Healthy & Sustainable Living	Encourage Healthy & Sustainable Living One star (the worst)	Encourage Healthy & Sustainable Living Two stars	Encourage Healthy & Sustainable Living Three stars	Encourage Healthy & Sustainable Living Four stars	Encourage Healthy & Sustainable Living Five stars (the best)

Comments

Question Title

* 9. PART 3
The Life on State team used a computer model called Envision Tomorrow to analyze how well each scenario performed on a few key goals. Some goals were more qualitative and were not measured with numbers.

Reviewing these measures of success, do you agree that the scenarios performed as you expected?

The modeling results are not what I expected

The modeling results are similar in some ways, but different in others

The modeling results are very close to what I expected

I don't know

Comments

Question Title

* 10. Which one of the four scenarios do you hope to see implemented?

	First choice (preferred)	Second choice	Third choice	Fourth choice (not preferred)
Scenario 1: Business as Usual	Scenario 1: Business as Usual First choice (preferred)	Scenario 1: Business as Usual Second choice	Scenario 1: Business as Usual Third choice	Scenario 1: Business as Usual Fourth choice (not preferred)
Scenario 2: Streetscape Upgrades	Scenario 2: Streetscape Upgrades First choice (preferred)	Scenario 2: Streetscape Upgrades Second choice	Scenario 2: Streetscape Upgrades Third choice	Scenario 2: Streetscape Upgrades Fourth choice (not preferred)
Scenario 3: Medium Improvements	Scenario 3: Medium Improvements First choice (preferred)	Scenario 3: Medium Improvements Second choice	Scenario 3: Medium Improvements Third choice	Scenario 3: Medium Improvements Fourth choice (not preferred)
Scenario 4: Full implementation	Scenario 4: Full implementation First choice (preferred)	Scenario 4: Full implementation Second choice	Scenario 4: Full implementation Third choice	Scenario 4: Full implementation Fourth choice (not preferred)

Why did you choose the scenario you did?