Please fill out the following information regarding the DEBATE which took place on Saturday, Sept. 21st, from 3:30 pm to 4:30 pm. 


15:30 – 16:30 Debate: Should we use only ‘evidence based’ therapies in our ART practice or should we ever offer the use of ‘unproven’ therapies when requested by patients or as part of our practice? 
Speakers: Dr. Bill Buckett vs. Dr. Clifford Librach

If needed, a link to the program can be found here.

Question Title

* 1. Were the intended learning objectives for the debate met [5 being clearly, effectively met, 1 being not met at all]?

Question Title

* 2. The presentations were free from commercial bias, or any other form of inappropriate bias [5 being strongly agree, 1 being strongly disagree].

Question Title

* 3. The information provided in the debate was relevant to my practice [5 being strongly agree, 1 being strongly disagree].

Question Title

* 4. Please score the overall delivery of the presentation content and audio visual [5 being exceptional, 1 being unsatisfactory].

Question Title

* 5. The speakers communicated clearly [5 being very clear, 1 being incomprehensible].

Question Title

* 6. The speakers were knowledgeable regarding their subject [5 being very knowledgeable, 1 being not knowledgeable at all].

Question Title

* 7. The debate promoted interaction (1 being no interaction, 5 being very interactive).

Question Title

* 8. What did you learn from this session? Please specify the presenter's name or the talk title when referring to a specific talk.

Question Title

* 9. What do you intend to incorporate into your workplace/practice? Please specify the presenter's name or talk title when referring to a specific talk.

Question Title

* 10. Overall, how would you rate this session (1 being unsatisfactory, 5 being exceptional)? Please explain.

Question Title

* 11. Additional comments:
Please specify the presenter's name when referring to a specific aspect of the debate.

0 of 11 answered
 

T