Please fill out the following information regarding the FRIDAY CONCURRENT SESSION(S) you attended, which took place on Friday, Sept. 20th, from 1:30 pm to 3:30 pm. 

13:30 – 15:30 CONCURRENT SESSIONS
CONCURRENT SESSION A: ANDROLOGY 
13:30 – 14:10 Robotic selection of a single sperm with high DNA integrity for ICSI
Speaker: Yu Sun

13:30 – 14:10 Effects of (Endo)cannabinoids On Male Reproduction
Speaker: Mauro Maccarone

13:30 – 14:10 Male Infertility as a Window to Health
Speaker: Michael Eisenberg

CONCURRENT SESSION B: CLINICAL 
13:30 – 14:10 Is it Possible to Personalize Luteal Phase Support in ART?
Speaker: Human Fatemi

14:10 – 14:50 Challenges in the effective provision of Fertility Preservation for girls and young women
Speaker: Richard Anderson

14:50 – 15:30 Management Strategies for the Treatment of Poor Responders
Speaker: Owen Davis

CONCURRENT SESSION C: COUNSELLING, ETHICS AND LAW 
13:30 – 14:10 Is it Time to Reconsider the Ban on Non-Therapeutic Preimplantation Sex Selection?
Speaker: Donrich Thaldar

14:10 – 14:50 Random Families: Genetic Strangers, Sperm Donor Siblings and Creation of New Kin
Speaker: Rosanna Hertz

14:50 – 15:30 Legal Principles and Seminal Legal Cases in Oocyte Donation
Speaker: Susan Crockin

CONCURRENT SESSION D: REPRODUCTIVE SURGERY AND IMAGING 
13-30 – 14:10 Hysteroscopy and Infertility
Speaker: Atillio Di Spiezio Sardo
14:10 – 15:30 Joint Session on Advancing Endometriosis Diagnosis Through Ultrasound
Speakers: Sony Singh and Vincent della Zazzera

If needed, a link to the program can be found here.

Question Title

1. Please indicate which concurrent session(s) you attended on FRIDAY.

Question Title

2. Were the intended learning objectives for the lectures met [5 being clearly, effectively met, 1 being not met at all]?

Question Title

3. The presentations were free from commercial bias, or any other form of inappropriate bias [5 being strongly agree, 1 being strongly disagree].

Question Title

4. The information provided in the lecture was relevant to my practice [5 being strongly agree, 1 being strongly disagree].

Question Title

5. Please score the overall delivery of the presentation content and audio visual [5 being exceptional, 1 being unsatisfactory].

Question Title

6. The speakers communicated clearly [5 being very clear, 1 being incomprehensible].

Question Title

7. The speakers were knowledgeable regarding their subject [5 being very knowledgeable, 1 being not knowledgeable at all].

Question Title

8. The lectures promoted interaction (1 being no interaction, 5 being very interactive).

Question Title

9. What did you learn from this session? Please specify the presenter's name or the talk title when referring to a specific talk.

Question Title

10. What do you intend to incorporate into your workplace/practice? Please specify the presenter's name or talk title when referring to a specific talk.

Question Title

11. Overall, how would you rate this session (1 being unsatisfactory, 5 being exceptional)? Please explain.

Question Title

12. Additional comments:
Please specify the presenter's name or talk title when referring to a specific talk.

0 of 12 answered
 

T