Please fill out the following information regarding the FRIDAY CONCURRENT SESSION(S) you attended, which took place on Friday, Sept. 20th, from 1:30 pm to 3:30 pm. 

13:30 – 15:30 CONCURRENT SESSIONS
CONCURRENT SESSION A: ANDROLOGY 
13:30 – 14:10 Robotic selection of a single sperm with high DNA integrity for ICSI
Speaker: Yu Sun

13:30 – 14:10 Effects of (Endo)cannabinoids On Male Reproduction
Speaker: Mauro Maccarone

13:30 – 14:10 Male Infertility as a Window to Health
Speaker: Michael Eisenberg

CONCURRENT SESSION B: CLINICAL 
13:30 – 14:10 Is it Possible to Personalize Luteal Phase Support in ART?
Speaker: Human Fatemi

14:10 – 14:50 Challenges in the effective provision of Fertility Preservation for girls and young women
Speaker: Richard Anderson

14:50 – 15:30 Management Strategies for the Treatment of Poor Responders
Speaker: Owen Davis

CONCURRENT SESSION C: COUNSELLING, ETHICS AND LAW 
13:30 – 14:10 Is it Time to Reconsider the Ban on Non-Therapeutic Preimplantation Sex Selection?
Speaker: Donrich Thaldar

14:10 – 14:50 Random Families: Genetic Strangers, Sperm Donor Siblings and Creation of New Kin
Speaker: Rosanna Hertz

14:50 – 15:30 Legal Principles and Seminal Legal Cases in Oocyte Donation
Speaker: Susan Crockin

CONCURRENT SESSION D: REPRODUCTIVE SURGERY AND IMAGING 
13-30 – 14:10 Hysteroscopy and Infertility
Speaker: Atillio Di Spiezio Sardo
14:10 – 15:30 Joint Session on Advancing Endometriosis Diagnosis Through Ultrasound
Speakers: Sony Singh and Vincent della Zazzera

If needed, a link to the program can be found here.

Question Title

* 1. Please indicate which concurrent session(s) you attended on FRIDAY.

Question Title

* 2. Were the intended learning objectives for the lectures met [5 being clearly, effectively met, 1 being not met at all]?

Question Title

* 3. The presentations were free from commercial bias, or any other form of inappropriate bias [5 being strongly agree, 1 being strongly disagree].

Question Title

* 4. The information provided in the lecture was relevant to my practice [5 being strongly agree, 1 being strongly disagree].

Question Title

* 5. Please score the overall delivery of the presentation content and audio visual [5 being exceptional, 1 being unsatisfactory].

Question Title

* 6. The speakers communicated clearly [5 being very clear, 1 being incomprehensible].

Question Title

* 7. The speakers were knowledgeable regarding their subject [5 being very knowledgeable, 1 being not knowledgeable at all].

Question Title

* 8. The lectures promoted interaction (1 being no interaction, 5 being very interactive).

Question Title

* 9. What did you learn from this session? Please specify the presenter's name or the talk title when referring to a specific talk.

Question Title

* 10. What do you intend to incorporate into your workplace/practice? Please specify the presenter's name or talk title when referring to a specific talk.

Question Title

* 11. Overall, how would you rate this session (1 being unsatisfactory, 5 being exceptional)? Please explain.

Question Title

* 12. Additional comments:
Please specify the presenter's name or talk title when referring to a specific talk.

0 of 12 answered
 

T