Skip to content
OSECE 2021 Virtual Conference Evaluation
1.
Name
2.
Name of Agency
3.
Email address to mail certificate
4.
Which certificate are you requesting?
CEU
CRC
Both
5.
Quality of Instruction
1 (Poor)
2 (Somewhat Poor)
3 (Average)
4 (Somewhat Superior)
5 (Superior)
Comments:
6.
Knowledge and expertise of instructor
1 (Poor)
2 (Somewhat Poor)
3 (Average)
4 (Somewhat Superior)
5 (Superior)
Comments:
7.
Usefulness of program content
1 (Poor)
2 (Somewhat Poor)
3 (Average)
4 (Somewhat Superior)
5 (Superior)
Comments:
8.
Presentation was clearly organized
1 (Disagree)
2 (Somewhat Disagree)
3 (Neither Agree nor Disagree)
4 (Somewhat Agree)
5 (Agree)
Comments:
9.
Presentation met the goals/objectives of the conference
1 (Disagree)
2 (Somewhat Disagree)
3 (Neither Agree nor Disagree)
4 (Somewhat Agree)
5 (Agree)
Comments:
10.
Conference contributed new, pertinent data to my understanding of the topic.
1 (Disagree)
2 (Somewhat Disagree)
3 (Neither Agree nor Disagree)
4 (Somewhat Agree)
5 (Agree)
Comments:
11.
Technology (access to, quality of stream, help available when needed, etc.) was adequate for the conference.
1 (Disagree)
2 (Somewhat Disagree)
3 (Neither Agree nor Disagree)
4 (Somewhat Agree)
5 (Agree)
Comments:
12.
Presenters were responsive to audience participation/questions.
1 (Disagree)
2 (Somewhat Disagree)
3 (Neither Agree nor Disagree)
4 (Somewhat Agree)
5 (Agree)
Comments:
13.
Overall the conference was...
1 (Poor)
2 (Somewhat Poor)
3 (Average)
4 (Somewhat Superior)
5 (Superior)
Comments:
14.
What level of practice did this conference address?
All levels
Entry level (0-2 years)
Intermediate level (2-10 years)
Advanced level (over 10 years)