Skip to content

Self-Study Course Feedback Survey | Bridging the Cultural Divide: From Complex to Consciousness

Jacqueline Gerson; Vlado Šolc, LCPC, CSAC, ICS; Gustavo Beck, PhD

Please indicate your satisfaction by clicking the appropriate circle below, using a scale of (1) Strongly Disagree, (2) Disagree, (3) Neutral, (4) Agree, (5) Strongly Agree or N/A (Not Applicable).
1.Learning
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
The material contributed to my understanding of Analytical Psychology.
Readings were congruent with the learning objectives.
The lecture contributed to achieving my personal or professional goals.
Cultural, racial, ethnic, socio-economic, and gender differences were considered.
The lecture content was appropriate for post-degree level training.
2.Learning Objectives
After viewing to this recording, I am now able to:
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
Describe how the religious function mediates the experience of the numinous.
Explain how unresolved symbolic tension may manifest as projection onto the Other within cultural and historical contexts.
Explore how psychological integration entails ethical responsibility (the movement from inner symbolic repair towards conscious participation in the healing and restoration of the world).
Describe how the narcissistic split shapes both individual and collective psychology, contributing to polarization and distorted perceptions of reality.
Explain the psychological dynamics of the conspiratorial mindset from a Jungian perspective as a symbolic manifestation of unconscious processes.
Apply a symbolic framework to conspiratorial thinking in order to understand how reducing projections support greater dialogue and integration in divided communities.
Identify how inner, ancestral, and collective voices, understood through cultural complexes and phantom narratives, shape personal identity and social conflict.
Reflect on what it means to listen psychologically to multiple, often silenced voices without resolving them into a single narrative.
3.The Instructor(s)
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
held my interest;
knew the material well; and 
used visual aids, handouts, and discussion effectively.
4.Recording Quality
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
I was able to hear well.
5.Professional Development
1
Not Useful
2
3
4
5
Extremely Useful
How useful was the content of this lecture for your practice or other professional or personal development?
6.What did you particularly like about the lecture or instructor?
7.What do you think could be improved?
8.What did you learn that was new or different?
Thank you for completing this evaluation. If you have any comments that you think need to be made in person, contact information for the chairs of the program committee is available on our website, HERE. You can also contact the Institute by email (jung@jungchicago.org) or by phone (312.701.0400). Our grievance policy is available HERE.
Privacy & Cookie Notice