OAP 20170915 - 1300 Update On

Friday, September 15

Update on Reporting Prostate Cancer Pathology with an Emphasis on Needle Biopsies

Speaker: Andrew Evans

Describe the evolution of the Gleason grading system for prostate cancer
List the changes made to Gleason grading system in November 2014 including the introduction of grade groups
Apply an grade group to sets of biopsies where individual cores have different Gleason scores
List key prognostic factors that should be included in reports of cases containing prostate cancer
Describe the implications of prostate biopsy findings for patient mangagement
Identify key resources and guidelines to assist with proper reporting of prostate biopsies containing cancer

Question Title

* 1. Please assess the Session

	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning	Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Strongly Disagree	Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Disagree	Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Neutral	Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Agree	Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Strongly Agree
The facilities were satisfactory	The facilities were satisfactory Strongly Disagree	The facilities were satisfactory Disagree	The facilities were satisfactory Neutral	The facilities were satisfactory Agree	The facilities were satisfactory Strongly Agree
The session was free from commercial bias	The session was free from commercial bias Strongly Disagree	The session was free from commercial bias Disagree	The session was free from commercial bias Neutral	The session was free from commercial bias Agree	The session was free from commercial bias Strongly Agree
Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent	Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Strongly Disagree	Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Disagree	Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Neutral	Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Agree	Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Strongly Agree

Question Title

* 2. Please assess the Speaker

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Outstanding
Clarity of Voice	Clarity of Voice Poor	Clarity of Voice Fair	Clarity of Voice Good	Clarity of Voice Very Good	Clarity of Voice Outstanding
Met Stated Objectives	Met Stated Objectives Poor	Met Stated Objectives Fair	Met Stated Objectives Good	Met Stated Objectives Very Good	Met Stated Objectives Outstanding
Balanced & Unbiased	Balanced & Unbiased Poor	Balanced & Unbiased Fair	Balanced & Unbiased Good	Balanced & Unbiased Very Good	Balanced & Unbiased Outstanding
Relevant to Practice Overall	Relevant to Practice Overall Poor	Relevant to Practice Overall Fair	Relevant to Practice Overall Good	Relevant to Practice Overall Very Good	Relevant to Practice Overall Outstanding
Time for Active Learning	Time for Active Learning Poor	Time for Active Learning Fair	Time for Active Learning Good	Time for Active Learning Very Good	Time for Active Learning Outstanding

Question Title

* 3. As a result of attending this session, I am planning to:

a) Discuss the session with my colleagues

b) Pursue additional learning activities.

c) Complete a Personal Learning Project.

d) Not change my practice.

e) Change my practice.

OAP 20170915 - 1300 Update On

Friday, September 15

Question Title

* 1. Please assess the Session

Question Title

* 2. Please assess the Speaker

Question Title

* 3. As a result of attending this session, I am planning to:

Question Title

* 4. Please explain any changes you plan to make or personal learning projects you will pursue as a result of this session:

Question Title

* 5. General comments about individual speaker:

Question Title

* 6. What topics would you like to be addressed at future conferences to keep you up to date in your profession?