2018 CAPS Evaluation & Questionnaire

Questions with an asterisk (*) must be answered.

Question Title

* 1. Please identify if you are a:

For questions 3 through 7 please select the number that reflects your assessment of each of the following aspects of the 2018 CAPS annual meeting:

Question Title

* 3. Annual Meeting Content: Relevance to my job

Question Title

* 4. Annual Meeting Content: Compatibility with my expectations

Question Title

* 5. Annual Meeting Format: Presentations, Discussions, Audience Size, Interactive sessions.

Question Title

* 6. Perceived Learning: How would you rate the amount you have learned in this meeting compared to similar meetings?

Question Title

* 7. Overall rating of this meeting.

Question Title

* 8. Comments?

Question Title

* 9. On a scale from 1 (Not satisfactory) to 5 (Extremely satisfactory), please rate the following components of the venue?

  1-Not at all satisfactory 2 3-Satisfactory 4 5-Extremely satisfactory
Location
Conference Hall
Poster display areas
Lighting
Audio-Visual equipment
Refreshments
Facilities
Venue staff

Question Title

* 10. On a scale from 1 (least valuable) to 5 (most valuable), please rate how valuable each meeting component is to you.

  1-Least valuable 2 3-Valuable 4 5-Most valuable Did not attend
Oral Scientific Sessions
CAPS Traveling Fellow Presentation-Dr. Robin Petroze
Video/Techniques Session
Poster Podium Presentation Sessions
CAPS at 50 Special Program Sessions
JPS-Fred MacLeod Lecture- Col. Cady Coleman (USAF, RET.)
CAPS Advocacy/Wellness Session 4th Annual Ein Panel-Dr. Carol-Anne Moulton
CAPS Education Session: "Difficult Case Conference & Lunch with the Experts"
CAPS Global Surgery Scholar Presentation- Dr. Aiah Lebbie, Sierra Leone
Update From CAPS Research Committee
Date: Thursday September 27, 2018
Time: 8:30 am
Type of Learning Activity: Information Session
Title: CAPS at 50- "Future CAPS:  The Next Generation"
Moderator: Erik Skarsgard

Question Title

* 11. For the CAPS at 50- "Future CAPS: The Next Generation" session please rate your level of agreement with the statements below, on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Agree nor Disagree Agree Strongly Agree N/A
The session met the stated learning objectives
The content met my learning needs
Potential conflicts of interest were clearly communicated

Question Title

* 12. Was the session balanced and unbiased?

Question Title

* 13. Sufficient time was allocated for interactive learning

Question Title

* 14. Describe at least two ways you intend to change your practice as a result of attending the CAPS at 50-"Future CAPS: The Next Generation" session.

Date: Thursday September 27, 2018
Time: 1:30 pm
Type of Learning Activity: Information Session
Title: CAPS at 50- "The Twilight Generation"
Moderator: Dr. Robert Baird

Question Title

* 15. For the CAPS at 50-"The Twilight Generation" please rate your level of agreement with the statements below, on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Agree nor Disagree Agree Strongly Agree N/A
The session met the stated learning objectives
The content met my learning needs
Potential conflicts of interest were clearly communicated

Question Title

* 16. Was the session balanced and unbiased?

Question Title

* 17. Sufficient time was allocated for interactive learning

Question Title

* 18. Describe at least two ways you intend to change your practice as a result of attending the CAPS at 50-"The Twilight Generation" session.

Date: Thursday September 27, 2018
Time: 14:30 pm
Type of Learning Activity: Plenary Speaker
Title: CAPS Next 50- "CAPS Serving Canada
Moderator: Dr. Sarah Bouchard

Question Title

* 19. For the CAPS Next 50- "CAPS Serving Canada" please rate your level of agreement with the statements below, on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Agree nor Disagree Agree Strongly Agree N/A
The session met the stated learning objectives
The content met my learning needs
Potential conflicts of interest were clearly communicated

Question Title

* 20. Was the session balanced and unbiased?

Question Title

* 21. Sufficient time was allocated for interactive learning

Question Title

* 22. Describe at least two ways you intend to change your practice as a result of attending the CAPS Next 50-"Future CAPS: The Next Generation" session.

Date: Friday September 28, 2018
Time: 9:45 am
Type of Learning Activity: Plenary Speaker
Title: The JPS-Fred MacLeod Lecture
Presenter: Col. Cady Coleman (USAF, RET)

Question Title

* 23. For the JPS-Fred MacLeod Lecture please rate your level of agreement with the statements below, on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Agree nor Disagree Agree Strongly Agree N/A
The session met the stated learning objectives
The content met my learning needs
Potential conflicts of interest were clearly communicated

Question Title

* 24. Was the session balanced and unbiased?

Question Title

* 25. Sufficient time was allocated for interactive learning

Question Title

* 26. Describe at least two ways you intend to change your practice as a result of attending the JPS-Fred MacLeod Lecture.

Date: Friday September 28, 2018
Time: 11:15 am
Type of Learning Activity: Plenary Speaker
Title: CAPS Advocacy/Wellness, Fourth Annual Ein Panel Session
Moderators: Dr. Ioana Bratu, Dr. Geoff Blair

Presenter: Dr. Carol-Anne Moulton

Question Title

* 27. For the CAPS Advocacy/Wellness and fourth annual Ein panel please rate your level of agreement with the statements below, on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Agree nor Disagree Agree Strongly Agree N/A
The session met the stated learning objectives
The content met my learning needs
Potential conflicts of interest were clearly communicated

Question Title

* 28. Was the session balanced and unbiased?

Question Title

* 29. Sufficient time was allocated for interactive learning

Question Title

* 30. Describe at least two ways you intend to change your practice as a result of attending the CAPS Advocacy/Wellness, fourth annual Ein panel.

Date: Friday September 28, 2018
Time: 1:00 pm
Type of Learning Activity: Education Session
Title: "Difficult Case Conference and Lunch with Experts"
Moderators: Dr. Andrea Winthrop & Dr. Steve Lopushinsky

Question Title

* 31. For the Education Session: "Lunchtime Case Conference and Lunch with Experts" please rate your level of agreement with the statements below, on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Agree nor Disagree Agree Strongly Agree N/A
The session met the stated learning objectives
The content met my learning needs
Potential conflicts of interest were clearly communicated

Question Title

* 32. Was the session balanced and unbiased?

Question Title

* 33. Sufficient time was allocated for interactive learning

Question Title

* 34. Describe at least two ways you intend to change your practice as a result of attending the "Difficult Case Conference and Lunch with Experts".

Question Title

* 35. For the Global Surgery Scholar presentation please rate your level of agreement with the statements below, on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

  Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Agree nor Disagree Agree Strongly Agree N/A
The session met the stated learning objectives
The content met my learning needs
Potential conflicts of interest were clearly communicated

Question Title

* 36. Was the session balanced and unbiased?

Question Title

* 37. Sufficient time was allocated for interactive learning

Question Title

* 38. Describe at least two ways you intend to change your practice as a result of attending the CAPS Global Surgery Scholar Presentation.

Question Title

* 39. Was the session balanced and unbiased?

Question Title

* 40. Sufficient time was allocated for interactive learning

Question Title

* 41. What was the most effective part of the meeting? Please tell us why.

Question Title

* 42. What was the least effective part of the meeting? Please tell us why.

Question Title

* 43. How closely were the following outlined meeting objectives met?

  1-Not met 2 3-Met satisfactorily 4 5-Exceeded Expectations
Present current updates on advances in clinical paediatric surgery
Present current updates on advances in the pathophysiology of paediatric surgical disorders
Provide for group discussion on controversial issues in pediatric surgery
Discussion of presented scientific papers and posters
Presentation and discussion on ethical and legal issues
Presentation and discussion on patient safety issues
Presentation and discussion on quality issues

Question Title

* 44. This activity has respected the code of ethics of parties involved in continuing medical education. CMA Code of Ethics

Question Title

* 45. This activity has respected the policy of the Canadian Medical Association: interaction with the pharmaceutical industry: directives for physicians. Physician-Industry Interaction

Question Title

* 46. Did you perceive any commercial bias in any part of the meeting or by any of the speakers?

Question Title

* 47. How could this meeting have been improved?

Question Title

* 48. Please list topics you'd like to hear about for future meetings.

Question Title

* 49. Please list possible speakers you'd like to hear from.

Question Title

* 50. Do you have any additional comments or suggestions?

Question Title

* 51. Please indicate which CanMEDS roles you felt were addressed during this meeting (please check all that apply).

T