Learning Objectives:

After attending this session, participants will be able to:
  1. Describe the challenges in anesthetic management of catheter-based approaches to treating high-risk pulmonary embolism as well as the anesthesiologist’s role in multi-disciplinary pulmonary embolism response teams (PERT).
  2. Provide an overview of Post Intensive Care Syndrome including a discussion of pain assessment and management with a review of Persistent Post Intensive Care Pain.
  3. Provide a brief overview of Pulmonary hypertension physiology including assessment and management of RV failure with a review of interventions and management of pulmonary hypertension in the ICU.

Question Title

1. Overall Session Evaluation

  Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
The objectives were clearly stated 
The stated objectives were met 
I acquired new skills and/or knowledge
I was introduced to new perspectives on my current practice
The content was relevant to my learning needs
This session promoted interaction (i.e., Q&A, polling etc.)

Question Title

2. This session encouraged me to consider changes to my practice

Question Title

3. Which CanMEDS roles were addressed?

Question Title

4. Moderator: Dr Margot Klemmer

  Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
The moderator was organized and managed the  session well

Question Title

5. Speaker: Dr Margot Klemmer

  Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Communicated clearly and effectively
Was knowledgeable about this topic
Used clear audiovisual aids, which enhanced the presentation
I would attend another presentation by this speaker in the future

Question Title

6. Overall, how would you rate the quality and effectiveness of the speaker's presentation with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent?

0 5 10
Clear
i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

7. Speaker: Dr Elias (Leo) Fares

  Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Communicated clearly and effectively
Was knowledgeable about this topic
Used clear audiovisual aids, which enhanced the presentation
I would attend another presentation by this speaker in the future

Question Title

8. Overall, how would you rate the quality and effectiveness of the speaker's presentation with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent?

0 5 10
Clear
i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

9. Speaker: Prof. Kathirvel Subramaniam

  Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Communicated clearly and effectively
Was knowledgeable about this topic
Used clear audiovisual aids, which enhanced the presentation
I would attend another presentation by this speaker in the future

Question Title

10. Overall, how would you rate the quality and effectiveness of the speaker's presentation with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent?

0 5 10
Clear
i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

11. The session and presenter(s) were balanced and free from commercial bias

Question Title

12. Please provide any additional comments or suggestions regarding this session, moderator(s), and speaker(s).

Thank you for completing the evaluation!

T