Skip to content
Private Lands Leadership Academy Evaluation Survey - Module 5
Your valuable feedback helps us to shape the future of the Private Lands Leadership Academy!
Please answer the following questions in review of Module 5: Conservation Project Management.
1.
The virtual meeting format was appropriate for the content presented.
5 - Strongly Agree
4
3
2
1 - Strongly Disagree
2.
The "
Strategic Stewardship: Enhancing Conservation through Project Management
" presentation provided me with practical techniques that can increase my effectiveness as a conservation professional.
5 - Strongly Agree
4
3
2
1 - Strongly Disagree
3.
The Project Management presenter, Autumn Barrow, was knowledgeable, well-prepared, and effective in presenting the material.
5 - Strongly Agree
4
3
2
1 - Strongly Disagree
4.
The facilitated activity building a project charter improved my understanding about how to implement project management principles into my work strategies.
5 - Strongly Agree
4
3
2
1 - Strongly Disagree
5.
The "
Effective Communications to Improve Landowner Relations
" presentation provided a practical understanding of relevant communications techniques for managing relationships with landowners.
5 - Strongly Agree
4
3
2
1 - Strongly Disagree
6.
The Landowner Communications presenter, Michelle Furr, was knowledgeable, well-prepared, and effective in presenting the material.
5 - Strongly Agree
4
3
2
1 - Strongly Disagree
7.
The presentation, "
The Conservation Project Life Cycle: Aligning Expectations with Reality
" improved my understanding about the roles and responsibilities of Private Lands Biologists and how to manage professional boundaries within projects.
5 - Strongly Agree
4
3
2
1 - Strongly Disagree
8.
The Conservation Project Lifecycle presenter, Randy Brents, was knowledgeable, well-prepared, and effective in presenting the material.
5 - Strongly Agree
4
3
2
1 - Strongly Disagree
9.
Overall, I am satisfied with the quality of Module 5: Conservation Project Management.
5 - Strongly agree
4
3
2
1 - Strongly disagree
10.
Which component(s) of Module 5: Conservation Project Management provided the most value to you?
11.
Which component(s) of Module 5: Conservation Project Management could we improve on?
12.
What do you wish we had covered in Module 5?