Copenhagen IC57 - Managing early complications in cataract surgery

Participant Name:

Question Title

* 1. Participant Name:

Professional Situation:

Question Title

* 2. Professional Situation:

Resident

University

Hospital Staff

Ophthalmic Assistant

Private Practice

Industry

What was your main reason for choosing this course?

Question Title

* 3. What was your main reason for choosing this course?

Interesting Topic

Good Faculty

Well-known Course Director

How did you rate the content of this course? (1 = poor, 5 = excellent)

Question Title

* 4. How did you rate the content of this course? (1 = poor, 5 = excellent)

How useful was the course for your clinical practice? (1 = poor, 5 = excellent)

Question Title

* 5. How useful was the course for your clinical practice? (1 = poor, 5 = excellent)

Did all listed faculty members attend this course?

Question Title

* 6. Did all listed faculty members attend this course?

Yes

Was the course free from commercial bias?

Question Title

* 7. Was the course free from commercial bias?

Yes

If no, what was the bias?

Do you have any suggestions to improve the presentations in this course?

Question Title

* 8. Do you have any suggestions to improve the presentations in this course?

How did you rate the quality of the speakers in this course? (1 = poor, 5 = excellent)

Question Title

* 9. How did you rate the quality of the speakers in this course? (1 = poor, 5 = excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
M. Pande	M. Pande 1	M. Pande 2	M. Pande 3	M. Pande 4	M. Pande 5
M. Nanavaty	M. Nanavaty 1	M. Nanavaty 2	M. Nanavaty 3	M. Nanavaty 4	M. Nanavaty 5
B. Little	B. Little 1	B. Little 2	B. Little 3	B. Little 4	B. Little 5
S. Srinivasan	S. Srinivasan 1	S. Srinivasan 2	S. Srinivasan 3	S. Srinivasan 4	S. Srinivasan 5
S. Goel	S. Goel 1	S. Goel 2	S. Goel 3	S. Goel 4	S. Goel 5
P. Ursell	P. Ursell 1	P. Ursell 2	P. Ursell 3	P. Ursell 4	P. Ursell 5

How did you rate the standard of English of the speakers in this course? (1 = poor, 5 = excellent)

Question Title

* 10. How did you rate the standard of English of the speakers in this course? (1 = poor, 5 = excellent)

	1	2	3	4	5
M. Pande	M. Pande 1	M. Pande 2	M. Pande 3	M. Pande 4	M. Pande 5
M. Nanavaty	M. Nanavaty 1	M. Nanavaty 2	M. Nanavaty 3	M. Nanavaty 4	M. Nanavaty 5
B. Little	B. Little 1	B. Little 2	B. Little 3	B. Little 4	B. Little 5
S. Srinivasan	S. Srinivasan 1	S. Srinivasan 2	S. Srinivasan 3	S. Srinivasan 4	S. Srinivasan 5
S. Goel	S. Goel 1	S. Goel 2	S. Goel 3	S. Goel 4	S. Goel 5
P. Ursell	P. Ursell 1	P. Ursell 2	P. Ursell 3	P. Ursell 4	P. Ursell 5

General Comments and Suggestions:

Question Title

* 1. Participant Name:

Question Title

* 2. Professional Situation:

Question Title

* 3. What was your main reason for choosing this course?

Question Title

* 4. How did you rate the content of this course? (1 = poor, 5 = excellent)

Question Title

* 5. How useful was the course for your clinical practice? (1 = poor, 5 = excellent)

Question Title

* 6. Did all listed faculty members attend this course?

Question Title

* 7. Was the course free from commercial bias?

Question Title

* 8. Do you have any suggestions to improve the presentations in this course?

Question Title

* 9. How did you rate the quality of the speakers in this course? (1 = poor, 5 = excellent)

Question Title

* 10. How did you rate the standard of English of the speakers in this course? (1 = poor, 5 = excellent)

Question Title

* 11. General Comments and Suggestions: