Annual National Medico Legal Seminar 2026 - Day 1

17 October 2026

Thank you for attending. We would appreciate it if you could take a few minutes to complete this evaluation form. Your feedback is important to us in improving our future programmes.

Question Title

1. Organisation of Activity

	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
How did you find the convenience of the venue?	How did you find the convenience of the venue? Poor	How did you find the convenience of the venue? Fair	How did you find the convenience of the venue? Good	How did you find the convenience of the venue? Excellent
How did you find the conference facilities?	How did you find the conference facilities? Poor	How did you find the conference facilities? Fair	How did you find the conference facilities? Good	How did you find the conference facilities? Excellent
How did you find the food and refreshments?	How did you find the food and refreshments? Poor	How did you find the food and refreshments? Fair	How did you find the food and refreshments? Good	How did you find the food and refreshments? Excellent
Was this activity value‐for‐money?	Was this activity value‐for‐money? Poor	Was this activity value‐for‐money? Fair	Was this activity value‐for‐money? Good	Was this activity value‐for‐money? Excellent
How did you find the activity duration?	How did you find the activity duration? Poor	How did you find the activity duration? Fair	How did you find the activity duration? Good	How did you find the activity duration? Excellent
Overall, how would you rate today’s activity?	Overall, how would you rate today’s activity? Poor	Overall, how would you rate today’s activity? Fair	Overall, how would you rate today’s activity? Good	Overall, how would you rate today’s activity? Excellent

Question Title

2. Evaluation of Speaker - Prof Richard Huxtable

	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Preparedness	Preparedness Poor	Preparedness Fair	Preparedness Good	Preparedness Excellent
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Excellent
Knowledgeable about subject matter	Knowledgeable about subject matter Poor	Knowledgeable about subject matter Fair	Knowledgeable about subject matter Good	Knowledgeable about subject matter Excellent
Ability to hold participants’ interest	Ability to hold participants’ interest Poor	Ability to hold participants’ interest Fair	Ability to hold participants’ interest Good	Ability to hold participants’ interest Excellent
Provided appropriate and adequate materials	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Poor	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Fair	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Good	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Excellent

Additional comments on Speaker:

Question Title

3. Evaluation of Speaker - Prof Choo Wee Jin, Philip

	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Preparedness	Preparedness Poor	Preparedness Fair	Preparedness Good	Preparedness Excellent
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Excellent
Knowledgeable about subject matter	Knowledgeable about subject matter Poor	Knowledgeable about subject matter Fair	Knowledgeable about subject matter Good	Knowledgeable about subject matter Excellent
Ability to hold participants’ interest	Ability to hold participants’ interest Poor	Ability to hold participants’ interest Fair	Ability to hold participants’ interest Good	Ability to hold participants’ interest Excellent
Provided appropriate and adequate materials	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Poor	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Fair	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Good	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Excellent

Additional comments on Speaker:

Question Title

4. Evaluation of Speaker - Prof Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna

	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Preparedness	Preparedness Poor	Preparedness Fair	Preparedness Good	Preparedness Excellent
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Excellent
Knowledgeable about subject matter	Knowledgeable about subject matter Poor	Knowledgeable about subject matter Fair	Knowledgeable about subject matter Good	Knowledgeable about subject matter Excellent
Ability to hold participants’ interest	Ability to hold participants’ interest Poor	Ability to hold participants’ interest Fair	Ability to hold participants’ interest Good	Ability to hold participants’ interest Excellent
Provided appropriate and adequate materials	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Poor	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Fair	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Good	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Excellent

Additional comments on Speaker:

Question Title

5. Evaluation of Speaker - Dr Hum Yin Mei, Allyn

	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Preparedness	Preparedness Poor	Preparedness Fair	Preparedness Good	Preparedness Excellent
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Excellent
Knowledgeable about subject matter	Knowledgeable about subject matter Poor	Knowledgeable about subject matter Fair	Knowledgeable about subject matter Good	Knowledgeable about subject matter Excellent
Ability to hold participants’ interest	Ability to hold participants’ interest Poor	Ability to hold participants’ interest Fair	Ability to hold participants’ interest Good	Ability to hold participants’ interest Excellent
Provided appropriate and adequate materials	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Poor	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Fair	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Good	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Excellent

Additional comments on Speakers:

Question Title

6. Evaluation of Moderator - Adj Prof Chin Jing Jih

	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Preparedness	Preparedness Poor	Preparedness Fair	Preparedness Good	Preparedness Excellent
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Excellent
Knowledgeable about subject matter	Knowledgeable about subject matter Poor	Knowledgeable about subject matter Fair	Knowledgeable about subject matter Good	Knowledgeable about subject matter Excellent
Ability to hold participants’ interest	Ability to hold participants’ interest Poor	Ability to hold participants’ interest Fair	Ability to hold participants’ interest Good	Ability to hold participants’ interest Excellent
Provided appropriate and adequate materials	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Poor	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Fair	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Good	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Excellent

Additional comments on Moderator:

Question Title

7. Evaluation of Judicator - Mr Edmund Kronenburg

	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Preparedness	Preparedness Poor	Preparedness Fair	Preparedness Good	Preparedness Excellent
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Excellent
Knowledgeable about subject matter	Knowledgeable about subject matter Poor	Knowledgeable about subject matter Fair	Knowledgeable about subject matter Good	Knowledgeable about subject matter Excellent
Ability to hold participants’ interest	Ability to hold participants’ interest Poor	Ability to hold participants’ interest Fair	Ability to hold participants’ interest Good	Ability to hold participants’ interest Excellent
Provided appropriate and adequate materials	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Poor	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Fair	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Good	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Excellent

Additional comments on Judicator:

Question Title

8. Evaluation of Proposition - Prof Chin Jing Jih

	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Preparedness	Preparedness Poor	Preparedness Fair	Preparedness Good	Preparedness Excellent
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Excellent
Knowledgeable about subject matter	Knowledgeable about subject matter Poor	Knowledgeable about subject matter Fair	Knowledgeable about subject matter Good	Knowledgeable about subject matter Excellent
Ability to hold participants’ interest	Ability to hold participants’ interest Poor	Ability to hold participants’ interest Fair	Ability to hold participants’ interest Good	Ability to hold participants’ interest Excellent
Provided appropriate and adequate materials	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Poor	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Fair	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Good	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Excellent

Additional comments on Proposition:

Question Title

9. Evaluation of Proposition - Prof Richard Huxtable

	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Preparedness	Preparedness Poor	Preparedness Fair	Preparedness Good	Preparedness Excellent
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Excellent
Knowledgeable about subject matter	Knowledgeable about subject matter Poor	Knowledgeable about subject matter Fair	Knowledgeable about subject matter Good	Knowledgeable about subject matter Excellent
Ability to hold participants’ interest	Ability to hold participants’ interest Poor	Ability to hold participants’ interest Fair	Ability to hold participants’ interest Good	Ability to hold participants’ interest Excellent
Provided appropriate and adequate materials	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Poor	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Fair	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Good	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Excellent

Additional comments on Proposition:

Question Title

10. Evaluation of Opposition - Assoc Prof Michael Dunn

	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Preparedness	Preparedness Poor	Preparedness Fair	Preparedness Good	Preparedness Excellent
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Excellent
Knowledgeable about subject matter	Knowledgeable about subject matter Poor	Knowledgeable about subject matter Fair	Knowledgeable about subject matter Good	Knowledgeable about subject matter Excellent
Ability to hold participants’ interest	Ability to hold participants’ interest Poor	Ability to hold participants’ interest Fair	Ability to hold participants’ interest Good	Ability to hold participants’ interest Excellent
Provided appropriate and adequate materials	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Poor	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Fair	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Good	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Excellent

Additional comments on Opposition:

Question Title

11. Evaluation of Opposition - Mr Melvin See

	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Preparedness	Preparedness Poor	Preparedness Fair	Preparedness Good	Preparedness Excellent
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Excellent
Knowledgeable about subject matter	Knowledgeable about subject matter Poor	Knowledgeable about subject matter Fair	Knowledgeable about subject matter Good	Knowledgeable about subject matter Excellent
Ability to hold participants’ interest	Ability to hold participants’ interest Poor	Ability to hold participants’ interest Fair	Ability to hold participants’ interest Good	Ability to hold participants’ interest Excellent
Provided appropriate and adequate materials	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Poor	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Fair	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Good	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Excellent

Additional comments on Opposition:

Question Title

12. Evaluation of Speaker - Adj Asst Prof Neo Han Yee

	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Preparedness	Preparedness Poor	Preparedness Fair	Preparedness Good	Preparedness Excellent
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Excellent
Knowledgeable about subject matter	Knowledgeable about subject matter Poor	Knowledgeable about subject matter Fair	Knowledgeable about subject matter Good	Knowledgeable about subject matter Excellent
Ability to hold participants’ interest	Ability to hold participants’ interest Poor	Ability to hold participants’ interest Fair	Ability to hold participants’ interest Good	Ability to hold participants’ interest Excellent
Provided appropriate and adequate materials	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Poor	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Fair	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Good	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Excellent

Additional comments on Speaker.

Question Title

13. Evaluation of Speaker - Ms Lin Jingyi

	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Preparedness	Preparedness Poor	Preparedness Fair	Preparedness Good	Preparedness Excellent
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Excellent
Knowledgeable about subject matter	Knowledgeable about subject matter Poor	Knowledgeable about subject matter Fair	Knowledgeable about subject matter Good	Knowledgeable about subject matter Excellent
Ability to hold participants’ interest	Ability to hold participants’ interest Poor	Ability to hold participants’ interest Fair	Ability to hold participants’ interest Good	Ability to hold participants’ interest Excellent
Provided appropriate and adequate materials	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Poor	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Fair	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Good	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Excellent

Additional comments on Speaker.

Question Title

14. Evaluation of Speaker - Ms Fionna Yow Chunru

	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Preparedness	Preparedness Poor	Preparedness Fair	Preparedness Good	Preparedness Excellent
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Excellent
Knowledgeable about subject matter	Knowledgeable about subject matter Poor	Knowledgeable about subject matter Fair	Knowledgeable about subject matter Good	Knowledgeable about subject matter Excellent
Ability to hold participants’ interest	Ability to hold participants’ interest Poor	Ability to hold participants’ interest Fair	Ability to hold participants’ interest Good	Ability to hold participants’ interest Excellent
Provided appropriate and adequate materials	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Poor	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Fair	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Good	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Excellent

Additional comments on Speaker.

Question Title

15. Evaluation of Speaker - Ms Ruby Lee

	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Preparedness	Preparedness Poor	Preparedness Fair	Preparedness Good	Preparedness Excellent
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Excellent
Knowledgeable about subject matter	Knowledgeable about subject matter Poor	Knowledgeable about subject matter Fair	Knowledgeable about subject matter Good	Knowledgeable about subject matter Excellent
Ability to hold participants’ interest	Ability to hold participants’ interest Poor	Ability to hold participants’ interest Fair	Ability to hold participants’ interest Good	Ability to hold participants’ interest Excellent
Provided appropriate and adequate materials	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Poor	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Fair	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Good	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Excellent

Additional comments on Speaker.

Question Title

16. Evaluation of Moderator- A/Prof Devanand Anantham

	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Preparedness	Preparedness Poor	Preparedness Fair	Preparedness Good	Preparedness Excellent
Clarity of presentation	Clarity of presentation Poor	Clarity of presentation Fair	Clarity of presentation Good	Clarity of presentation Excellent
Knowledgeable about subject matter	Knowledgeable about subject matter Poor	Knowledgeable about subject matter Fair	Knowledgeable about subject matter Good	Knowledgeable about subject matter Excellent
Ability to hold participants’ interest	Ability to hold participants’ interest Poor	Ability to hold participants’ interest Fair	Ability to hold participants’ interest Good	Ability to hold participants’ interest Excellent
Provided appropriate and adequate materials	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Poor	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Fair	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Good	Provided appropriate and adequate materials Excellent

Annual National Medico Legal Seminar 2026 - Day 1

17 October 2026

Question Title

1. Organisation of Activity

Question Title

2. Evaluation of Speaker - Prof Richard Huxtable

Question Title

3. Evaluation of Speaker - Prof Choo Wee Jin, Philip

Question Title

4. Evaluation of Speaker - Prof Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna

Question Title

5. Evaluation of Speaker - Dr Hum Yin Mei, Allyn

Question Title

6. Evaluation of Moderator - Adj Prof Chin Jing Jih

Question Title

7. Evaluation of Judicator - Mr Edmund Kronenburg

Question Title

8. Evaluation of Proposition - Prof Chin Jing Jih

Question Title

9. Evaluation of Proposition - Prof Richard Huxtable

Question Title

10. Evaluation of Opposition - Assoc Prof Michael Dunn

Question Title

11. Evaluation of Opposition - Mr Melvin See

Question Title

12. Evaluation of Speaker - Adj Asst Prof Neo Han Yee

Question Title

13. Evaluation of Speaker - Ms Lin Jingyi

Question Title

14. Evaluation of Speaker - Ms Fionna Yow Chunru

Question Title

15. Evaluation of Speaker - Ms Ruby Lee

Question Title

16. Evaluation of Moderator- A/Prof Devanand Anantham

Question Title

17. How can we improve?

Question Title

18. What other learning activities would you like to see organised?

Question Title

* 1. Organisation of Activity

Question Title

* 2. Evaluation of Speaker - Prof Richard Huxtable

Question Title

* 3. Evaluation of Speaker - Prof Choo Wee Jin, Philip

Question Title

* 4. Evaluation of Speaker - Prof Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna

Question Title

* 5. Evaluation of Speaker - Dr Hum Yin Mei, Allyn

Question Title

* 6. Evaluation of Moderator - Adj Prof Chin Jing Jih

Question Title

* 7. Evaluation of Judicator - Mr Edmund Kronenburg

Question Title

* 8. Evaluation of Proposition - Prof Chin Jing Jih

Question Title

* 9. Evaluation of Proposition - Prof Richard Huxtable

Question Title

* 10. Evaluation of Opposition - Assoc Prof Michael Dunn

Question Title

* 11. Evaluation of Opposition - Mr Melvin See

Question Title

* 12. Evaluation of Speaker - Adj Asst Prof Neo Han Yee

Question Title

* 13. Evaluation of Speaker - Ms Lin Jingyi

Question Title

* 14. Evaluation of Speaker - Ms Fionna Yow Chunru

Question Title

* 15. Evaluation of Speaker - Ms Ruby Lee

Question Title

* 16. Evaluation of Moderator- A/Prof Devanand Anantham

Question Title

* 17. How can we improve?

Question Title

* 18. What other learning activities would you like to see organised?

1. Organisation of Activity

2. Evaluation of Speaker - Prof Richard Huxtable

3. Evaluation of Speaker - Prof Choo Wee Jin, Philip

4. Evaluation of Speaker - Prof Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna

5. Evaluation of Speaker - Dr Hum Yin Mei, Allyn

6. Evaluation of Moderator - Adj Prof Chin Jing Jih

7. Evaluation of Judicator - Mr Edmund Kronenburg

8. Evaluation of Proposition - Prof Chin Jing Jih

9. Evaluation of Proposition - Prof Richard Huxtable

10. Evaluation of Opposition - Assoc Prof Michael Dunn

11. Evaluation of Opposition - Mr Melvin See

12. Evaluation of Speaker - Adj Asst Prof Neo Han Yee

13. Evaluation of Speaker - Ms Lin Jingyi

14. Evaluation of Speaker - Ms Fionna Yow Chunru

15. Evaluation of Speaker - Ms Ruby Lee

16. Evaluation of Moderator- A/Prof Devanand Anantham

17. How can we improve?

18. What other learning activities would you like to see organised?