ConservativeHome's July 2012 survey

1. Next election

12% of survey complete.

Question Title

* 1. Please say whether the following things will have a good or bad impact on Tory chances at the next election...

	-5 (very bad impact)	-4	-3	-2	-1	NO IMPACT	+1	+2	+3	+4	+5 (very positive impact)
A pact with UKIP that avoids the two parties standing against each other in marginal seats	A pact with UKIP that avoids the two parties standing against each other in marginal seats -5 (very bad impact)	A pact with UKIP that avoids the two parties standing against each other in marginal seats -4	A pact with UKIP that avoids the two parties standing against each other in marginal seats -3	A pact with UKIP that avoids the two parties standing against each other in marginal seats -2	A pact with UKIP that avoids the two parties standing against each other in marginal seats -1	A pact with UKIP that avoids the two parties standing against each other in marginal seats NO IMPACT	A pact with UKIP that avoids the two parties standing against each other in marginal seats +1	A pact with UKIP that avoids the two parties standing against each other in marginal seats +2	A pact with UKIP that avoids the two parties standing against each other in marginal seats +3	A pact with UKIP that avoids the two parties standing against each other in marginal seats +4	A pact with UKIP that avoids the two parties standing against each other in marginal seats +5 (very positive impact)
Greater party unity and loyalty to David Cameron	Greater party unity and loyalty to David Cameron -5 (very bad impact)	Greater party unity and loyalty to David Cameron -4	Greater party unity and loyalty to David Cameron -3	Greater party unity and loyalty to David Cameron -2	Greater party unity and loyalty to David Cameron -1	Greater party unity and loyalty to David Cameron NO IMPACT	Greater party unity and loyalty to David Cameron +1	Greater party unity and loyalty to David Cameron +2	Greater party unity and loyalty to David Cameron +3	Greater party unity and loyalty to David Cameron +4	Greater party unity and loyalty to David Cameron +5 (very positive impact)
More northern and working class candidates with experience of life beyond politics	More northern and working class candidates with experience of life beyond politics -5 (very bad impact)	More northern and working class candidates with experience of life beyond politics -4	More northern and working class candidates with experience of life beyond politics -3	More northern and working class candidates with experience of life beyond politics -2	More northern and working class candidates with experience of life beyond politics -1	More northern and working class candidates with experience of life beyond politics NO IMPACT	More northern and working class candidates with experience of life beyond politics +1	More northern and working class candidates with experience of life beyond politics +2	More northern and working class candidates with experience of life beyond politics +3	More northern and working class candidates with experience of life beyond politics +4	More northern and working class candidates with experience of life beyond politics +5 (very positive impact)
A new consumer agenda that reduces the power of big banks, energy companies and supermarkets	A new consumer agenda that reduces the power of big banks, energy companies and supermarkets -5 (very bad impact)	A new consumer agenda that reduces the power of big banks, energy companies and supermarkets -4	A new consumer agenda that reduces the power of big banks, energy companies and supermarkets -3	A new consumer agenda that reduces the power of big banks, energy companies and supermarkets -2	A new consumer agenda that reduces the power of big banks, energy companies and supermarkets -1	A new consumer agenda that reduces the power of big banks, energy companies and supermarkets NO IMPACT	A new consumer agenda that reduces the power of big banks, energy companies and supermarkets +1	A new consumer agenda that reduces the power of big banks, energy companies and supermarkets +2	A new consumer agenda that reduces the power of big banks, energy companies and supermarkets +3	A new consumer agenda that reduces the power of big banks, energy companies and supermarkets +4	A new consumer agenda that reduces the power of big banks, energy companies and supermarkets +5 (very positive impact)
Some devolution to England	Some devolution to England -5 (very bad impact)	Some devolution to England -4	Some devolution to England -3	Some devolution to England -2	Some devolution to England -1	Some devolution to England NO IMPACT	Some devolution to England +1	Some devolution to England +2	Some devolution to England +3	Some devolution to England +4	Some devolution to England +5 (very positive impact)
A plan to cut taxes and energy bills for ordinary families	A plan to cut taxes and energy bills for ordinary families -5 (very bad impact)	A plan to cut taxes and energy bills for ordinary families -4	A plan to cut taxes and energy bills for ordinary families -3	A plan to cut taxes and energy bills for ordinary families -2	A plan to cut taxes and energy bills for ordinary families -1	A plan to cut taxes and energy bills for ordinary families NO IMPACT	A plan to cut taxes and energy bills for ordinary families +1	A plan to cut taxes and energy bills for ordinary families +2	A plan to cut taxes and energy bills for ordinary families +3	A plan to cut taxes and energy bills for ordinary families +4	A plan to cut taxes and energy bills for ordinary families +5 (very positive impact)
End of the Barnett formula that favours Scotland in distribution of public funding	End of the Barnett formula that favours Scotland in distribution of public funding -5 (very bad impact)	End of the Barnett formula that favours Scotland in distribution of public funding -4	End of the Barnett formula that favours Scotland in distribution of public funding -3	End of the Barnett formula that favours Scotland in distribution of public funding -2	End of the Barnett formula that favours Scotland in distribution of public funding -1	End of the Barnett formula that favours Scotland in distribution of public funding NO IMPACT	End of the Barnett formula that favours Scotland in distribution of public funding +1	End of the Barnett formula that favours Scotland in distribution of public funding +2	End of the Barnett formula that favours Scotland in distribution of public funding +3	End of the Barnett formula that favours Scotland in distribution of public funding +4	End of the Barnett formula that favours Scotland in distribution of public funding +5 (very positive impact)
Sustained attacks on Ed Miliband and Ed Balls	Sustained attacks on Ed Miliband and Ed Balls -5 (very bad impact)	Sustained attacks on Ed Miliband and Ed Balls -4	Sustained attacks on Ed Miliband and Ed Balls -3	Sustained attacks on Ed Miliband and Ed Balls -2	Sustained attacks on Ed Miliband and Ed Balls -1	Sustained attacks on Ed Miliband and Ed Balls NO IMPACT	Sustained attacks on Ed Miliband and Ed Balls +1	Sustained attacks on Ed Miliband and Ed Balls +2	Sustained attacks on Ed Miliband and Ed Balls +3	Sustained attacks on Ed Miliband and Ed Balls +4	Sustained attacks on Ed Miliband and Ed Balls +5 (very positive impact)
Replacing George Osborne with a potentially more popular Chancellor	Replacing George Osborne with a potentially more popular Chancellor -5 (very bad impact)	Replacing George Osborne with a potentially more popular Chancellor -4	Replacing George Osborne with a potentially more popular Chancellor -3	Replacing George Osborne with a potentially more popular Chancellor -2	Replacing George Osborne with a potentially more popular Chancellor -1	Replacing George Osborne with a potentially more popular Chancellor NO IMPACT	Replacing George Osborne with a potentially more popular Chancellor +1	Replacing George Osborne with a potentially more popular Chancellor +2	Replacing George Osborne with a potentially more popular Chancellor +3	Replacing George Osborne with a potentially more popular Chancellor +4	Replacing George Osborne with a potentially more popular Chancellor +5 (very positive impact)
Stronger policies on crime and immigration	Stronger policies on crime and immigration -5 (very bad impact)	Stronger policies on crime and immigration -4	Stronger policies on crime and immigration -3	Stronger policies on crime and immigration -2	Stronger policies on crime and immigration -1	Stronger policies on crime and immigration NO IMPACT	Stronger policies on crime and immigration +1	Stronger policies on crime and immigration +2	Stronger policies on crime and immigration +3	Stronger policies on crime and immigration +4	Stronger policies on crime and immigration +5 (very positive impact)
A change of Labour leader from Ed Miliband to someone like Yvette Cooper	A change of Labour leader from Ed Miliband to someone like Yvette Cooper -5 (very bad impact)	A change of Labour leader from Ed Miliband to someone like Yvette Cooper -4	A change of Labour leader from Ed Miliband to someone like Yvette Cooper -3	A change of Labour leader from Ed Miliband to someone like Yvette Cooper -2	A change of Labour leader from Ed Miliband to someone like Yvette Cooper -1	A change of Labour leader from Ed Miliband to someone like Yvette Cooper NO IMPACT	A change of Labour leader from Ed Miliband to someone like Yvette Cooper +1	A change of Labour leader from Ed Miliband to someone like Yvette Cooper +2	A change of Labour leader from Ed Miliband to someone like Yvette Cooper +3	A change of Labour leader from Ed Miliband to someone like Yvette Cooper +4	A change of Labour leader from Ed Miliband to someone like Yvette Cooper +5 (very positive impact)
Replacement of the Human Rights Act	Replacement of the Human Rights Act -5 (very bad impact)	Replacement of the Human Rights Act -4	Replacement of the Human Rights Act -3	Replacement of the Human Rights Act -2	Replacement of the Human Rights Act -1	Replacement of the Human Rights Act NO IMPACT	Replacement of the Human Rights Act +1	Replacement of the Human Rights Act +2	Replacement of the Human Rights Act +3	Replacement of the Human Rights Act +4	Replacement of the Human Rights Act +5 (very positive impact)
Dropping controversial policies like House of Lords reform and gay marriage	Dropping controversial policies like House of Lords reform and gay marriage -5 (very bad impact)	Dropping controversial policies like House of Lords reform and gay marriage -4	Dropping controversial policies like House of Lords reform and gay marriage -3	Dropping controversial policies like House of Lords reform and gay marriage -2	Dropping controversial policies like House of Lords reform and gay marriage -1	Dropping controversial policies like House of Lords reform and gay marriage NO IMPACT	Dropping controversial policies like House of Lords reform and gay marriage +1	Dropping controversial policies like House of Lords reform and gay marriage +2	Dropping controversial policies like House of Lords reform and gay marriage +3	Dropping controversial policies like House of Lords reform and gay marriage +4	Dropping controversial policies like House of Lords reform and gay marriage +5 (very positive impact)
Withdraw all troops from Afghanistan	Withdraw all troops from Afghanistan -5 (very bad impact)	Withdraw all troops from Afghanistan -4	Withdraw all troops from Afghanistan -3	Withdraw all troops from Afghanistan -2	Withdraw all troops from Afghanistan -1	Withdraw all troops from Afghanistan NO IMPACT	Withdraw all troops from Afghanistan +1	Withdraw all troops from Afghanistan +2	Withdraw all troops from Afghanistan +3	Withdraw all troops from Afghanistan +4	Withdraw all troops from Afghanistan +5 (very positive impact)
A new party leader like Boris Johnson	A new party leader like Boris Johnson -5 (very bad impact)	A new party leader like Boris Johnson -4	A new party leader like Boris Johnson -3	A new party leader like Boris Johnson -2	A new party leader like Boris Johnson -1	A new party leader like Boris Johnson NO IMPACT	A new party leader like Boris Johnson +1	A new party leader like Boris Johnson +2	A new party leader like Boris Johnson +3	A new party leader like Boris Johnson +4	A new party leader like Boris Johnson +5 (very positive impact)
A bankable promise to deliver an EU referendum	A bankable promise to deliver an EU referendum -5 (very bad impact)	A bankable promise to deliver an EU referendum -4	A bankable promise to deliver an EU referendum -3	A bankable promise to deliver an EU referendum -2	A bankable promise to deliver an EU referendum -1	A bankable promise to deliver an EU referendum NO IMPACT	A bankable promise to deliver an EU referendum +1	A bankable promise to deliver an EU referendum +2	A bankable promise to deliver an EU referendum +3	A bankable promise to deliver an EU referendum +4	A bankable promise to deliver an EU referendum +5 (very positive impact)
A new party leader like William Hague	A new party leader like William Hague -5 (very bad impact)	A new party leader like William Hague -4	A new party leader like William Hague -3	A new party leader like William Hague -2	A new party leader like William Hague -1	A new party leader like William Hague NO IMPACT	A new party leader like William Hague +1	A new party leader like William Hague +2	A new party leader like William Hague +3	A new party leader like William Hague +4	A new party leader like William Hague +5 (very positive impact)
A successful debt reduction policy	A successful debt reduction policy -5 (very bad impact)	A successful debt reduction policy -4	A successful debt reduction policy -3	A successful debt reduction policy -2	A successful debt reduction policy -1	A successful debt reduction policy NO IMPACT	A successful debt reduction policy +1	A successful debt reduction policy +2	A successful debt reduction policy +3	A successful debt reduction policy +4	A successful debt reduction policy +5 (very positive impact)
A pact with the Liberal Democrats that avoids the two parties standing against each other in marginal seats	A pact with the Liberal Democrats that avoids the two parties standing against each other in marginal seats -5 (very bad impact)	A pact with the Liberal Democrats that avoids the two parties standing against each other in marginal seats -4	A pact with the Liberal Democrats that avoids the two parties standing against each other in marginal seats -3	A pact with the Liberal Democrats that avoids the two parties standing against each other in marginal seats -2	A pact with the Liberal Democrats that avoids the two parties standing against each other in marginal seats -1	A pact with the Liberal Democrats that avoids the two parties standing against each other in marginal seats NO IMPACT	A pact with the Liberal Democrats that avoids the two parties standing against each other in marginal seats +1	A pact with the Liberal Democrats that avoids the two parties standing against each other in marginal seats +2	A pact with the Liberal Democrats that avoids the two parties standing against each other in marginal seats +3	A pact with the Liberal Democrats that avoids the two parties standing against each other in marginal seats +4	A pact with the Liberal Democrats that avoids the two parties standing against each other in marginal seats +5 (very positive impact)
Signs of reasonable economic recovery	Signs of reasonable economic recovery -5 (very bad impact)	Signs of reasonable economic recovery -4	Signs of reasonable economic recovery -3	Signs of reasonable economic recovery -2	Signs of reasonable economic recovery -1	Signs of reasonable economic recovery NO IMPACT	Signs of reasonable economic recovery +1	Signs of reasonable economic recovery +2	Signs of reasonable economic recovery +3	Signs of reasonable economic recovery +4	Signs of reasonable economic recovery +5 (very positive impact)
A strong commitment to protect the NHS	A strong commitment to protect the NHS -5 (very bad impact)	A strong commitment to protect the NHS -4	A strong commitment to protect the NHS -3	A strong commitment to protect the NHS -2	A strong commitment to protect the NHS -1	A strong commitment to protect the NHS NO IMPACT	A strong commitment to protect the NHS +1	A strong commitment to protect the NHS +2	A strong commitment to protect the NHS +3	A strong commitment to protect the NHS +4	A strong commitment to protect the NHS +5 (very positive impact)
A housebuilding policy for young people	A housebuilding policy for young people -5 (very bad impact)	A housebuilding policy for young people -4	A housebuilding policy for young people -3	A housebuilding policy for young people -2	A housebuilding policy for young people -1	A housebuilding policy for young people NO IMPACT	A housebuilding policy for young people +1	A housebuilding policy for young people +2	A housebuilding policy for young people +3	A housebuilding policy for young people +4	A housebuilding policy for young people +5 (very positive impact)
Cut foreign aid and spend the savings on Britain's poorest pensioners	Cut foreign aid and spend the savings on Britain's poorest pensioners -5 (very bad impact)	Cut foreign aid and spend the savings on Britain's poorest pensioners -4	Cut foreign aid and spend the savings on Britain's poorest pensioners -3	Cut foreign aid and spend the savings on Britain's poorest pensioners -2	Cut foreign aid and spend the savings on Britain's poorest pensioners -1	Cut foreign aid and spend the savings on Britain's poorest pensioners NO IMPACT	Cut foreign aid and spend the savings on Britain's poorest pensioners +1	Cut foreign aid and spend the savings on Britain's poorest pensioners +2	Cut foreign aid and spend the savings on Britain's poorest pensioners +3	Cut foreign aid and spend the savings on Britain's poorest pensioners +4	Cut foreign aid and spend the savings on Britain's poorest pensioners +5 (very positive impact)

Other (please specify)