June 5, 2026, 4:15 pm - 5:45 pm

Learning Objectives:

After attending this session, participants will be able to:
  1. Outline the history of the CAS Gold Medal and its past recipients.
  2. Identify personal and institutional values that foster long-term contributions to anesthesia care, education, research, and advocacy.
  3. Describe key attributes and practices that contributed to the professional achievements and leadership trajectories of the featured award recipients.

Question Title

* 1. I attended this session:

Question Title

* 2. Overall Session Evaluation

  Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
The objectives were clearly stated 
The stated objectives were met 
I acquired new skills and/or knowledge
I was introduced to new perspectives on my current practice
The content was relevant to my learning needs
This session promoted interaction (i.e., Q&A, polling etc.)

Question Title

* 3. This session encouraged me to consider changes to my practice

Question Title

* 4. Which CanMEDS roles were addressed?

Question Title

* 5. Moderator: Dr. Mike Wong

  Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
The moderator was organized and managed the  session well

Question Title

* 6. Speaker: Dr. Peter Slinger

  Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Communicated clearly and effectively
Was knowledgeable about this topic
Used clear audiovisual aids, which enhanced the presentation
I would attend another presentation by this speaker in the future

Question Title

* 7. Overall, how would you rate the quality and effectiveness of the speaker's presentation with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent?

0 5 10
Clear
i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

* 8. Speaker: Dr. Patricia Houston

  Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Communicated clearly and effectively
Was knowledgeable about this topic
Used clear audiovisual aids, which enhanced the presentation
I would attend another presentation by this speaker in the future

Question Title

* 9. Overall, how would you rate the quality and effectiveness of the speaker's presentation with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent?

0 5 10
Clear
i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

* 10. Speaker: Dr. Donald Miller

  Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Communicated clearly and effectively
Was knowledgeable about this topic
Used clear audiovisual aids, which enhanced the presentation
I would attend another presentation by this speaker in the future

Question Title

* 11. Overall, how would you rate the quality and effectiveness of the speaker's presentation with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent?

0 5 10
Clear
i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

* 12. Speaker: Dr. Patricia Morley-Forster

  Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Communicated clearly and effectively
Was knowledgeable about this topic
Used clear audiovisual aids, which enhanced the presentation
I would attend another presentation by this speaker in the future

Question Title

* 13. Overall, how would you rate the quality and effectiveness of the speaker's presentation with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent?

0 5 10
Clear
i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

* 14. The session and presenter(s) were balanced and free from commercial bias

Question Title

* 15. Please provide any additional comments or suggestions regarding this session, moderator(s), and speaker(s).

Thank you for completing the evaluation!

T