1.How often does your organization experience trade breaks or settlement delays due to missing or incomplete trade attribute data (e.g., execution method, trade type, order-placing broker ID)?

Never / Rarely

Occasionally (monthly)

Frequently (weekly)

Constantly (daily)

2.What is the primary impact of these issues? (Select up to 2)

Increased operational workload

Regulatory/reporting challenges

Reconciliation issues

Difficulty managing T+1 deadlines

Other (please specify)

3.Which of the following proposed trade tagging enhancements would provide the greatest operational benefit to your organization? (Choose up to 3)

Broader support for FIA Tag 1031 (execution method identification)

Consistent Block/EFRP trade type reporting from executing brokers

Order-placing broker identification passed through to clearing

Parent order ID grouping for multi-leg strategy trades

Client trade ID pass-through (including average price trade linkage/reporting)

Unique CCP fill ID linked to original trade ID

4.Which trade attributes are most commonly missing, unavailable, or inconsistent in the trade data your organization receives today (Select all that apply)

Execution method (Tag 1031)

Block/EFRP trade type flags

Order-placing broker ID

Multi-leg strategy parent order ID

Client trade ID

Average price (AVP) linkage/reporting detail

Unique CCP fill ID

5.Would a central registry of executing/order-placing brokers (with standardized IDs) be valuable to your operations?

Yes, highly valuable

Somewhat valuable

Not necessary

Unsure / need more detail

6.What would be the primary benefit?

Reduced onboarding effort

Fewer settlement exceptions

Improved reporting accuracy

Better broker transparency

Operational efficiency

Other (please specify)

7.Any additional comments