20170501 CCMG-CCGM - Symposium 2 WES and Metabolic and Mitochondrial Diseases Question Title * 1. Please assess the Sessions overrall Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Strongly Disagree Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Disagree Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Neutral Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Agree Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Strongly Agree The facilities were satisfactory The facilities were satisfactory Strongly Disagree The facilities were satisfactory Disagree The facilities were satisfactory Neutral The facilities were satisfactory Agree The facilities were satisfactory Strongly Agree The session was free from commercial bias The session was free from commercial bias Strongly Disagree The session was free from commercial bias Disagree The session was free from commercial bias Neutral The session was free from commercial bias Agree The session was free from commercial bias Strongly Agree Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Strongly Disagree Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Disagree Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Neutral Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Agree Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Strongly Agree Please assess each Speaker by their Session: Question Title * 2. Molecular Diagnostics in the Integrated Approach to Mitochondrial DiseaseSpeaker: Grant Mitchell Service de génétique médicale, Hôpital Ste-Justine, Montréal QCObjectives: At the end of this session, participants will be able to:1. Explain the differences in molecular diagnostics of diseases due to mitochondrial DNA mutations and those due to nuclear DNA mutations.2. Summarize the criteria for assigning the pathogenicity of nuclear mutations in mitochondrial disease. 3. Explain the importance of tissue heteroplasmy in determining the phenotype of diseases of mitochondrial DNA. 4. Discuss the use of molecular diagnosis with respect to clinical and biochemical evaluations of the patient and of patient samples. Poor Fair Good Very Good Outstanding Clarity of Voice Clarity of Voice Poor Clarity of Voice Fair Clarity of Voice Good Clarity of Voice Very Good Clarity of Voice Outstanding Met Stated Objectives Met Stated Objectives Poor Met Stated Objectives Fair Met Stated Objectives Good Met Stated Objectives Very Good Met Stated Objectives Outstanding Balanced & Unbiased Balanced & Unbiased Poor Balanced & Unbiased Fair Balanced & Unbiased Good Balanced & Unbiased Very Good Balanced & Unbiased Outstanding Relevant to Practice Overall Relevant to Practice Overall Poor Relevant to Practice Overall Fair Relevant to Practice Overall Good Relevant to Practice Overall Very Good Relevant to Practice Overall Outstanding Time for Active Learning Time for Active Learning Poor Time for Active Learning Fair Time for Active Learning Good Time for Active Learning Very Good Time for Active Learning Outstanding Comments Question Title * 3. Molecular Diagnostics in the Integrated Approach to Mitochondrial DiseaseSpeaker: Jean-François Soucy CHU Sainte-Justine, Hôpital Ste-Justine, Montréal QCObjectives: At the end of this session, participants will be able to:1. Explain the differences in molecular diagnostics of diseases due to mitochondrial DNA mutations and those due to nuclear DNA mutations.2. Summarize the criteria for assigning the pathogenicity of nuclear mutations in mitochondrial disease. 3. Explain the importance of tissue heteroplasmy in determining the phenotype of diseases of mitochondrial DNA. 4. Discuss the use of molecular diagnosis with respect to clinical and biochemical evaluations of the patient and of patient samples. Poor Fair Good Very Good Outstanding Clarity of Voice Clarity of Voice Poor Clarity of Voice Fair Clarity of Voice Good Clarity of Voice Very Good Clarity of Voice Outstanding Met Stated Objectives Met Stated Objectives Poor Met Stated Objectives Fair Met Stated Objectives Good Met Stated Objectives Very Good Met Stated Objectives Outstanding Balanced & Unbiased Balanced & Unbiased Poor Balanced & Unbiased Fair Balanced & Unbiased Good Balanced & Unbiased Very Good Balanced & Unbiased Outstanding Relevant to Practice Overall Relevant to Practice Overall Poor Relevant to Practice Overall Fair Relevant to Practice Overall Good Relevant to Practice Overall Very Good Relevant to Practice Overall Outstanding Time for Active Learning Time for Active Learning Poor Time for Active Learning Fair Time for Active Learning Good Time for Active Learning Very Good Time for Active Learning Outstanding Comments Question Title * 4. Molecular Diagnostics in the Integrated Approach to Mitochondrial DiseaseSpeaker: Julie Gauthier CHU Sainte-Justine, Hôpital Ste-Justine, Montréal QCObjectives: At the end of this session, participants will be able to:1. Explain the differences in molecular diagnostics of diseases due to mitochondrial DNA mutations and those due to nuclear DNA mutations.2. Summarize the criteria for assigning the pathogenicity of nuclear mutations in mitochondrial disease. 3. Explain the importance of tissue heteroplasmy in determining the phenotype of diseases of mitochondrial DNA. 4. Discuss the use of molecular diagnosis with respect to clinical and biochemical evaluations of the patient and of patient samples. Poor Fair Good Very Good Outstanding Clarity of Voice Clarity of Voice Poor Clarity of Voice Fair Clarity of Voice Good Clarity of Voice Very Good Clarity of Voice Outstanding Met Stated Objectives Met Stated Objectives Poor Met Stated Objectives Fair Met Stated Objectives Good Met Stated Objectives Very Good Met Stated Objectives Outstanding Balanced & Unbiased Balanced & Unbiased Poor Balanced & Unbiased Fair Balanced & Unbiased Good Balanced & Unbiased Very Good Balanced & Unbiased Outstanding Relevant to Practice Overall Relevant to Practice Overall Poor Relevant to Practice Overall Fair Relevant to Practice Overall Good Relevant to Practice Overall Very Good Relevant to Practice Overall Outstanding Time for Active Learning Time for Active Learning Poor Time for Active Learning Fair Time for Active Learning Good Time for Active Learning Very Good Time for Active Learning Outstanding Comments Question Title * 5. Neurodegeration when iron is the culpritSpeaker: Patrick MacLeod Medical Genetics, Department Office, University of British Columbia, BCObjectives: At the end of this session, participants will be able to:1. Summarize the biology of iron metabolism 2. Discuss the role of iron in the brain3. Discuss the various forms of neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation 4. List the genes involved in NBIA Poor Fair Good Very Good Outstanding Clarity of Voice Clarity of Voice Poor Clarity of Voice Fair Clarity of Voice Good Clarity of Voice Very Good Clarity of Voice Outstanding Met Stated Objectives Met Stated Objectives Poor Met Stated Objectives Fair Met Stated Objectives Good Met Stated Objectives Very Good Met Stated Objectives Outstanding Balanced & Unbiased Balanced & Unbiased Poor Balanced & Unbiased Fair Balanced & Unbiased Good Balanced & Unbiased Very Good Balanced & Unbiased Outstanding Relevant to Practice Overall Relevant to Practice Overall Poor Relevant to Practice Overall Fair Relevant to Practice Overall Good Relevant to Practice Overall Very Good Relevant to Practice Overall Outstanding Time for Active Learning Time for Active Learning Poor Time for Active Learning Fair Time for Active Learning Good Time for Active Learning Very Good Time for Active Learning Outstanding Comments Question Title * 6. Peroxisome biogenesis disorders and related single enzyme defects: clinical updates and pre-clinical approaches to targeted therapies.Speaker: Nancy Braverman McGill University, Montréal QCObjectives: At the end of this session, participants will be able to:1. Integrate newly described peroxisome disorders 2. Formulate a diagnostic model for the different peroxisome disorders3. Describe new contributions to peroxisome biology 4. Appraise preclinical approaches to therapy Poor Fair Good Very Good Outstanding Clarity of Voice Clarity of Voice Poor Clarity of Voice Fair Clarity of Voice Good Clarity of Voice Very Good Clarity of Voice Outstanding Met Stated Objectives Met Stated Objectives Poor Met Stated Objectives Fair Met Stated Objectives Good Met Stated Objectives Very Good Met Stated Objectives Outstanding Balanced & Unbiased Balanced & Unbiased Poor Balanced & Unbiased Fair Balanced & Unbiased Good Balanced & Unbiased Very Good Balanced & Unbiased Outstanding Relevant to Practice Overall Relevant to Practice Overall Poor Relevant to Practice Overall Fair Relevant to Practice Overall Good Relevant to Practice Overall Very Good Relevant to Practice Overall Outstanding Time for Active Learning Time for Active Learning Poor Time for Active Learning Fair Time for Active Learning Good Time for Active Learning Very Good Time for Active Learning Outstanding Comments Question Title * 7. Mitochondrial Diseases: Whole exome sequencing and beyond.Speaker: Eric Shoubridge McGill University, Montréal QCObjectives: At the end of this session, participants will be able to:1. Maximize success of finding genetic defects by WES 2. Validate variants of unknown significance 3. Use modern tools for interrogating mitochondrial interactomes Poor Fair Good Very Good Outstanding Clarity of Voice Clarity of Voice Poor Clarity of Voice Fair Clarity of Voice Good Clarity of Voice Very Good Clarity of Voice Outstanding Met Stated Objectives Met Stated Objectives Poor Met Stated Objectives Fair Met Stated Objectives Good Met Stated Objectives Very Good Met Stated Objectives Outstanding Balanced & Unbiased Balanced & Unbiased Poor Balanced & Unbiased Fair Balanced & Unbiased Good Balanced & Unbiased Very Good Balanced & Unbiased Outstanding Relevant to Practice Overall Relevant to Practice Overall Poor Relevant to Practice Overall Fair Relevant to Practice Overall Good Relevant to Practice Overall Very Good Relevant to Practice Overall Outstanding Time for Active Learning Time for Active Learning Poor Time for Active Learning Fair Time for Active Learning Good Time for Active Learning Very Good Time for Active Learning Outstanding Comments Question Title * 8. As a result of attending this session, I am planning to: a) Discuss the session with my colleagues b) Pursue additional learning activities. c) Complete a Personal Learning Project. d) Not change my practice. e) Change my practice. Question Title * 9. Please explain any changes you plan to make or personal learning projects you will pursue as a result of this session: Question Title * 10. Please indicate which CanMEDS roles you felt were addressed during this educational activity. (Select all that apply) Medical Expert Communicator Collaborator Manager Health Advocate Scholar Professional Question Title * 11. General comments about individual speaker: Question Title * 12. What topics would you like to be addressed at future conferences to keep you up to date in your profession? Done