2021 CSE Post-Annual Meeting Survey

CONTENT

Your name is required to validate this evaluation and will be kept separate from your responses. Please complete this survey to aid CSE leaders in decision-making about the 2022 Annual Meeting.

Question Title

* 1. Name:

Question Title

* 2. Please rate the following on this year's plenary presenter, , with 5 indicating the ‎highest level of approval.‎

	1	2	3	4	5	N/A
Quality of the speaker	Quality of the speaker 1	Quality of the speaker 2	Quality of the speaker 3	Quality of the speaker 4	Quality of the speaker 5	Quality of the speaker N/A
Quality of the presentation	Quality of the presentation 1	Quality of the presentation 2	Quality of the presentation 3	Quality of the presentation 4	Quality of the presentation 5	Quality of the presentation N/A
Level of informative content	Level of informative content 1	Level of informative content 2	Level of informative content 3	Level of informative content 4	Level of informative content 5	Level of informative content N/A

Question Title

* 3. Please rate the following on this year's keynote presenter, Z, with 5 indicating the ‎highest level of approval.‎

	1	2	3	4	5	N/A
Quality of the speaker	Quality of the speaker 1	Quality of the speaker 2	Quality of the speaker 3	Quality of the speaker 4	Quality of the speaker 5	Quality of the speaker N/A
Quality of the presentation	Quality of the presentation 1	Quality of the presentation 2	Quality of the presentation 3	Quality of the presentation 4	Quality of the presentation 5	Quality of the presentation N/A
Level of informative content	Level of informative content 1	Level of informative content 2	Level of informative content 3	Level of informative content 4	Level of informative content 5	Level of informative content N/A

Question Title

* 4. Please rate the following on this year's Oxford-style Debate general session, featuring Michael Clarke, Elizabeth Bik, and Daniel Bolnick, with 5 indicating the highest level of approval.

	1	2	3	4	5	N/A
Quality of the speakers	Quality of the speakers 1	Quality of the speakers 2	Quality of the speakers 3	Quality of the speakers 4	Quality of the speakers 5	Quality of the speakers N/A
Quality of the session format	Quality of the session format 1	Quality of the session format 2	Quality of the session format 3	Quality of the session format 4	Quality of the session format 5	Quality of the session format N/A
Level of informative content	Level of informative content 1	Level of informative content 2	Level of informative content 3	Level of informative content 4	Level of informative content 5	Level of informative content N/A

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the proportion of content in each of the following categories:

	Not Enough	The Right Amount	Too Much
Business	Business Not Enough	Business The Right Amount	Business Too Much
Career	Career Not Enough	Career The Right Amount	Career Too Much
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion	Diversity, Equity, Inclusion Not Enough	Diversity, Equity, Inclusion The Right Amount	Diversity, Equity, Inclusion Too Much
Editorial	Editorial Not Enough	Editorial The Right Amount	Editorial Too Much
Industry	Industry Not Enough	Industry The Right Amount	Industry Too Much
Ethics	Ethics Not Enough	Ethics The Right Amount	Ethics Too Much
Policy	Policy Not Enough	Policy The Right Amount	Policy Too Much
Production	Production Not Enough	Production The Right Amount	Production Too Much

Question Title

* 6. What session was most valuable to you? Why?‎

Question Title

* 7. What session was the least valuable to you? Why?

Question Title

* 8. What topic(s) were missing from this year's program that you wish were represented in sessions?

Question Title

* 9. What session(s) or topics would you like to see revisited during the 2021 Fall Symposium or 2022 Annual Meeting?

Question Title

* 10. Did you find the speakers diverse in terms of demographics?

Yes

No

Question Title

* 11. Did you find the speakers diverse in terms of perspectives? ‎

Yes

No