20170502 CCMG-CCGM - Symposium 3 Population Genetics / Founder Effects Question Title * 1. Please assess the Sessions overrall Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Strongly Disagree Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Disagree Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Neutral Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Agree Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Strongly Agree The facilities were satisfactory The facilities were satisfactory Strongly Disagree The facilities were satisfactory Disagree The facilities were satisfactory Neutral The facilities were satisfactory Agree The facilities were satisfactory Strongly Agree The session was free from commercial bias The session was free from commercial bias Strongly Disagree The session was free from commercial bias Disagree The session was free from commercial bias Neutral The session was free from commercial bias Agree The session was free from commercial bias Strongly Agree Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Strongly Disagree Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Disagree Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Neutral Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Agree Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Strongly Agree Please assess each Speaker by their Session: Question Title * 2. The Importance of Peace of Mind: Lessons Learned from the Evaluation of a Community-based Carrier Screening Program in First Nations CommunitiesSpeaker: Anne Marie Laberge DCHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal QCObjectives: At the end of this session, participants will be able to:1. Describe the carrier screening program for Cree encephalitis and Cree leukoencephalopathy in the Cree communities of James Bay 2. Discuss the importance of adapting a program to the target population's needs and values3. Use the lessons learned in this setting to their own practice when counseling individuals and couples about carrier screening for recessive conditions Poor Fair Good Very Good Outstanding Clarity of Voice Clarity of Voice Poor Clarity of Voice Fair Clarity of Voice Good Clarity of Voice Very Good Clarity of Voice Outstanding Met Stated Objectives Met Stated Objectives Poor Met Stated Objectives Fair Met Stated Objectives Good Met Stated Objectives Very Good Met Stated Objectives Outstanding Balanced & Unbiased Balanced & Unbiased Poor Balanced & Unbiased Fair Balanced & Unbiased Good Balanced & Unbiased Very Good Balanced & Unbiased Outstanding Relevant to Practice Overall Relevant to Practice Overall Poor Relevant to Practice Overall Fair Relevant to Practice Overall Good Relevant to Practice Overall Very Good Relevant to Practice Overall Outstanding Time for Active Learning Time for Active Learning Poor Time for Active Learning Fair Time for Active Learning Good Time for Active Learning Very Good Time for Active Learning Outstanding Comments Question Title * 3. The Great Migration and African-American genomic diversitySpeaker: Simon Gravel McGill University, Montréal QCObjectives: At the end of this session, participants will be able to:1. Describe how recent history affected genomic diversity 2. Build models of genetic admixture 3. Build models of genetic relatedness Poor Fair Good Very Good Outstanding Clarity of Voice Clarity of Voice Poor Clarity of Voice Fair Clarity of Voice Good Clarity of Voice Very Good Clarity of Voice Outstanding Met Stated Objectives Met Stated Objectives Poor Met Stated Objectives Fair Met Stated Objectives Good Met Stated Objectives Very Good Met Stated Objectives Outstanding Balanced & Unbiased Balanced & Unbiased Poor Balanced & Unbiased Fair Balanced & Unbiased Good Balanced & Unbiased Very Good Balanced & Unbiased Outstanding Relevant to Practice Overall Relevant to Practice Overall Poor Relevant to Practice Overall Fair Relevant to Practice Overall Good Relevant to Practice Overall Very Good Relevant to Practice Overall Outstanding Time for Active Learning Time for Active Learning Poor Time for Active Learning Fair Time for Active Learning Good Time for Active Learning Very Good Time for Active Learning Outstanding Comments Question Title * 4. The Great Migration and African-American genomic diversitySpeaker: Soheil Baharian McGill University, Montréal QCObjectives: At the end of this session, participants will be able to:1. Describe how recent history affected genomic diversity 2. Build models of genetic admixture 3. Build models of genetic relatedness Poor Fair Good Very Good Outstanding Clarity of Voice Clarity of Voice Poor Clarity of Voice Fair Clarity of Voice Good Clarity of Voice Very Good Clarity of Voice Outstanding Met Stated Objectives Met Stated Objectives Poor Met Stated Objectives Fair Met Stated Objectives Good Met Stated Objectives Very Good Met Stated Objectives Outstanding Balanced & Unbiased Balanced & Unbiased Poor Balanced & Unbiased Fair Balanced & Unbiased Good Balanced & Unbiased Very Good Balanced & Unbiased Outstanding Relevant to Practice Overall Relevant to Practice Overall Poor Relevant to Practice Overall Fair Relevant to Practice Overall Good Relevant to Practice Overall Very Good Relevant to Practice Overall Outstanding Time for Active Learning Time for Active Learning Poor Time for Active Learning Fair Time for Active Learning Good Time for Active Learning Very Good Time for Active Learning Outstanding Comments Question Title * 5. High tech in a low tech world: The provision of culturally sensitive genetics healthcare to the Amish and Mennonite population in southwestern Ontario.Speaker: Victoria Siuedical Genetics, University of Western Pntario, London ON Objectives: At the end of this session, participants will be able to:1. Discuss the importance of cultural competency in working with Anabaptist groups2. Summarize resources available for diagnosis and management of genetic disorders in this population 3. Discuss the outcomes of a targeted newborn and carrier screening program Poor Fair Good Very Good Outstanding Clarity of Voice Clarity of Voice Poor Clarity of Voice Fair Clarity of Voice Good Clarity of Voice Very Good Clarity of Voice Outstanding Met Stated Objectives Met Stated Objectives Poor Met Stated Objectives Fair Met Stated Objectives Good Met Stated Objectives Very Good Met Stated Objectives Outstanding Balanced & Unbiased Balanced & Unbiased Poor Balanced & Unbiased Fair Balanced & Unbiased Good Balanced & Unbiased Very Good Balanced & Unbiased Outstanding Relevant to Practice Overall Relevant to Practice Overall Poor Relevant to Practice Overall Fair Relevant to Practice Overall Good Relevant to Practice Overall Very Good Relevant to Practice Overall Outstanding Time for Active Learning Time for Active Learning Poor Time for Active Learning Fair Time for Active Learning Good Time for Active Learning Very Good Time for Active Learning Outstanding Comments Question Title * 6. From Gene Discovery to Provision of Genomic Medicine in the Hutterite PopulationSpeaker: Cheryl Rockman-Greenberg Pediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Health Science Centre, Winnipeg MB Objectives: At the end of this session, participants will be able to:1. Name at least 3 autosomal recessive diseases unique to Hutterites where the mutations are known. 2. Define what the “Hutterite Chip” is and its main role in diagnostics. 3. Describe the molecular technology behind the “Hutterite Chip”. 4. Assess the pros and cons of implementing a “Hutterite Chip” into medical practice. 5. Discuss the ethical concerns. Poor Fair Good Very Good Outstanding Clarity of Voice Clarity of Voice Poor Clarity of Voice Fair Clarity of Voice Good Clarity of Voice Very Good Clarity of Voice Outstanding Met Stated Objectives Met Stated Objectives Poor Met Stated Objectives Fair Met Stated Objectives Good Met Stated Objectives Very Good Met Stated Objectives Outstanding Balanced & Unbiased Balanced & Unbiased Poor Balanced & Unbiased Fair Balanced & Unbiased Good Balanced & Unbiased Very Good Balanced & Unbiased Outstanding Relevant to Practice Overall Relevant to Practice Overall Poor Relevant to Practice Overall Fair Relevant to Practice Overall Good Relevant to Practice Overall Very Good Relevant to Practice Overall Outstanding Time for Active Learning Time for Active Learning Poor Time for Active Learning Fair Time for Active Learning Good Time for Active Learning Very Good Time for Active Learning Outstanding Comments Question Title * 7. From Gene Discovery to Provision of Genomic Medicine in the Hutterite PopulationSpeaker: Beth Spriggs Dept. of Clinical Biochemistry and Genetics, Diagnostic Services Manitoba, Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg MB Objectives: At the end of this session, participants will be able to:1. Name at least 3 autosomal recessive diseases unique to Hutterites where the mutations are known. 2. Define what the “Hutterite Chip” is and its main role in diagnostics. 3. Describe the molecular technology behind the “Hutterite Chip”. 4. Assess the pros and cons of implementing a “Hutterite Chip” into medical practice. 5. Discuss the ethical concerns. Poor Fair Good Very Good Outstanding Clarity of Voice Clarity of Voice Poor Clarity of Voice Fair Clarity of Voice Good Clarity of Voice Very Good Clarity of Voice Outstanding Met Stated Objectives Met Stated Objectives Poor Met Stated Objectives Fair Met Stated Objectives Good Met Stated Objectives Very Good Met Stated Objectives Outstanding Balanced & Unbiased Balanced & Unbiased Poor Balanced & Unbiased Fair Balanced & Unbiased Good Balanced & Unbiased Very Good Balanced & Unbiased Outstanding Relevant to Practice Overall Relevant to Practice Overall Poor Relevant to Practice Overall Fair Relevant to Practice Overall Good Relevant to Practice Overall Very Good Relevant to Practice Overall Outstanding Time for Active Learning Time for Active Learning Poor Time for Active Learning Fair Time for Active Learning Good Time for Active Learning Very Good Time for Active Learning Outstanding Comments Question Title * 8. As a result of attending this session, I am planning to: a) Discuss the session with my colleagues b) Pursue additional learning activities. c) Complete a Personal Learning Project. d) Not change my practice. e) Change my practice. Question Title * 9. Please explain any changes you plan to make or personal learning projects you will pursue as a result of this session: Question Title * 10. Please indicate which CanMEDS roles you felt were addressed during this educational activity. (Select all that apply) Medical Expert Communicator Collaborator Manager Health Advocate Scholar Professional Question Title * 11. General comments about individual speaker: Question Title * 12. What topics would you like to be addressed at future conferences to keep you up to date in your profession? Done