The 7th Annual Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity Forum 1. The 6th Annual Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity Forum 6 Evaluation Question Title * 1. Please rate the following aspects of today’s forum for the quality of each item. Please use a five-point rating scale where 1 is taken to mean very low quality, and 5 is taken to mean very high quality. Low- 1 2 3 4 5 -High Participant Packages Participant Packages Low- 1 Participant Packages 2 Participant Packages 3 Participant Packages 4 Participant Packages 5 -High Speakers/Presenters Speakers/Presenters Low- 1 Speakers/Presenters 2 Speakers/Presenters 3 Speakers/Presenters 4 Speakers/Presenters 5 -High Panel Discussions/ Q & A Session Panel Discussions/ Q & A Session Low- 1 Panel Discussions/ Q & A Session 2 Panel Discussions/ Q & A Session 3 Panel Discussions/ Q & A Session 4 Panel Discussions/ Q & A Session 5 -High Venue including meal choices Venue including meal choices Low- 1 Venue including meal choices 2 Venue including meal choices 3 Venue including meal choices 4 Venue including meal choices 5 -High Overall Topic / Flow of the Agenda Overall Topic / Flow of the Agenda Low- 1 Overall Topic / Flow of the Agenda 2 Overall Topic / Flow of the Agenda 3 Overall Topic / Flow of the Agenda 4 Overall Topic / Flow of the Agenda 5 -High Additional Comments Question Title * 2. Please rate the following aspects of today’s forum for how useful you believe each item may prove to be in your current work. Please use a five-point rating scale where 1 is taken to mean very low usefulness, and 5 is taken to mean very high usefulness. Low- 1 2 3 4 5 -High Participant Packages Participant Packages Low- 1 Participant Packages 2 Participant Packages 3 Participant Packages 4 Participant Packages 5 -High Speakers/Presenters Speakers/Presenters Low- 1 Speakers/Presenters 2 Speakers/Presenters 3 Speakers/Presenters 4 Speakers/Presenters 5 -High Panel Discussions/ Q & A Session Panel Discussions/ Q & A Session Low- 1 Panel Discussions/ Q & A Session 2 Panel Discussions/ Q & A Session 3 Panel Discussions/ Q & A Session 4 Panel Discussions/ Q & A Session 5 -High Venue including meal choices Venue including meal choices Low- 1 Venue including meal choices 2 Venue including meal choices 3 Venue including meal choices 4 Venue including meal choices 5 -High Overall Topic / Flow of the Agenda Overall Topic / Flow of the Agenda Low- 1 Overall Topic / Flow of the Agenda 2 Overall Topic / Flow of the Agenda 3 Overall Topic / Flow of the Agenda 4 Overall Topic / Flow of the Agenda 5 -High Additional Comments Question Title * 3. Please rate the presentations of each speaker for quality. For each, please use a five-point rating scale where 1 is taken to mean very low quality , and 5 is taken to mean very high quality. Low- 1 2 3 4 5 -High Maristela Monteiro Maristela Monteiro Low- 1 Maristela Monteiro 2 Maristela Monteiro 3 Maristela Monteiro 4 Maristela Monteiro 5 -High Nancy Langdon and Norman Giesbrecht Nancy Langdon and Norman Giesbrecht Low- 1 Nancy Langdon and Norman Giesbrecht 2 Nancy Langdon and Norman Giesbrecht 3 Nancy Langdon and Norman Giesbrecht 4 Nancy Langdon and Norman Giesbrecht 5 -High Thomas Babor Thomas Babor Low- 1 Thomas Babor 2 Thomas Babor 3 Thomas Babor 4 Thomas Babor 5 -High Penny Nelligan Penny Nelligan Low- 1 Penny Nelligan 2 Penny Nelligan 3 Penny Nelligan 4 Penny Nelligan 5 -High Victoria Van Gilst Victoria Van Gilst Low- 1 Victoria Van Gilst 2 Victoria Van Gilst 3 Victoria Van Gilst 4 Victoria Van Gilst 5 -High Susan Shepherd Susan Shepherd Low- 1 Susan Shepherd 2 Susan Shepherd 3 Susan Shepherd 4 Susan Shepherd 5 -High Denise DePape Denise DePape Low- 1 Denise DePape 2 Denise DePape 3 Denise DePape 4 Denise DePape 5 -High Andy Murie Andy Murie Low- 1 Andy Murie 2 Andy Murie 3 Andy Murie 4 Andy Murie 5 -High Nancy Langdon (as moderator) Nancy Langdon (as moderator) Low- 1 Nancy Langdon (as moderator) 2 Nancy Langdon (as moderator) 3 Nancy Langdon (as moderator) 4 Nancy Langdon (as moderator) 5 -High Additional Comments Question Title * 4. Please rate the presentations of each speaker for how useful you believe each presentation may prove to be in your current work. Please use a five-point rating scale where 1 is taken to mean very low usefulness, and 5 is taken to mean very high usefulness. Low- 1 2 3 4 5 -High Maristela Monteiro Maristela Monteiro Low- 1 Maristela Monteiro 2 Maristela Monteiro 3 Maristela Monteiro 4 Maristela Monteiro 5 -High Nancy Langdon and Norman Giesbrecht Nancy Langdon and Norman Giesbrecht Low- 1 Nancy Langdon and Norman Giesbrecht 2 Nancy Langdon and Norman Giesbrecht 3 Nancy Langdon and Norman Giesbrecht 4 Nancy Langdon and Norman Giesbrecht 5 -High Thomas Babor Thomas Babor Low- 1 Thomas Babor 2 Thomas Babor 3 Thomas Babor 4 Thomas Babor 5 -High Penny Nelligan Penny Nelligan Low- 1 Penny Nelligan 2 Penny Nelligan 3 Penny Nelligan 4 Penny Nelligan 5 -High Victoria Van Gilst Victoria Van Gilst Low- 1 Victoria Van Gilst 2 Victoria Van Gilst 3 Victoria Van Gilst 4 Victoria Van Gilst 5 -High Susan Shepherd Susan Shepherd Low- 1 Susan Shepherd 2 Susan Shepherd 3 Susan Shepherd 4 Susan Shepherd 5 -High Denise DePape Denise DePape Low- 1 Denise DePape 2 Denise DePape 3 Denise DePape 4 Denise DePape 5 -High Andy Murie Andy Murie Low- 1 Andy Murie 2 Andy Murie 3 Andy Murie 4 Andy Murie 5 -High Nancy Langdon (as moderator) Nancy Langdon (as moderator) Low- 1 Nancy Langdon (as moderator) 2 Nancy Langdon (as moderator) 3 Nancy Langdon (as moderator) 4 Nancy Langdon (as moderator) 5 -High Additional Comments Question Title * 5. The objectives of the forum are listed in the table below. Please rate the extent in which you felt our objectives were met. For each, please use a five-point rating scale where 1 is taken to mean that the objectives were not met at all, and 5 is taken to mean that the objectives were met at a high level. Low- 1 2 3 4 5 -High Provide opportunities for networking with colleagues Provide opportunities for networking with colleagues Low- 1 Provide opportunities for networking with colleagues 2 Provide opportunities for networking with colleagues 3 Provide opportunities for networking with colleagues 4 Provide opportunities for networking with colleagues 5 -High Provide current alcohol policy information Provide current alcohol policy information Low- 1 Provide current alcohol policy information 2 Provide current alcohol policy information 3 Provide current alcohol policy information 4 Provide current alcohol policy information 5 -High Provide mobilization startegies on alcohol policy issues Provide mobilization startegies on alcohol policy issues Low- 1 Provide mobilization startegies on alcohol policy issues 2 Provide mobilization startegies on alcohol policy issues 3 Provide mobilization startegies on alcohol policy issues 4 Provide mobilization startegies on alcohol policy issues 5 -High Other: Other: Low- 1 Other: 2 Other: 3 Other: 4 Other: 5 -High If you selected other please specify. Question Title * 6. Would you recommend these annual forums to your colleagues? Yes No Maybe Question Title * 7. Please indicate which, if any, of the previous forums you have attended. February 27, 2004 (alcohol policy in Ontario) March 11, 2005 (alcohol public monopolies) March 3, 2006 (alcohol advertising) March 22, 2007 (alcohol and chronic disease prevention) March 27, 2008 (adapting National and Provincial alcohol strategies for local impact) March 5, 2009 (alcohol across the life span: with a focus on injury prevention and chronic disease) Question Title * 8. In the table below, please rate your level of attributes PRIOR to today’s forum IN RELATION TO ALCOHOL POLICY. For each, please use a five-point rating scale where 1 is taken to mean very low or little skill in this area, and 5 is taken to mean very high or strong skills in this area. Low- 1 2 3 4 5 -High Knowledge Knowledge Low- 1 Knowledge 2 Knowledge 3 Knowledge 4 Knowledge 5 -High Use of Practical Applications Use of Practical Applications Low- 1 Use of Practical Applications 2 Use of Practical Applications 3 Use of Practical Applications 4 Use of Practical Applications 5 -High Networking and Relationship Building Networking and Relationship Building Low- 1 Networking and Relationship Building 2 Networking and Relationship Building 3 Networking and Relationship Building 4 Networking and Relationship Building 5 -High Community Mobilization Strategies Community Mobilization Strategies Low- 1 Community Mobilization Strategies 2 Community Mobilization Strategies 3 Community Mobilization Strategies 4 Community Mobilization Strategies 5 -High Other: Other: Low- 1 Other: 2 Other: 3 Other: 4 Other: 5 -High If you selected other, please specify. Question Title * 9. In the table below, please rate your level of attributes AFTER today’s forum IN RELATION TO ALCOHOL POLICY. For each, please use a five-point rating scale where 1 is taken to mean very low or little skill in this area, and 5 is taken to mean very high or strong skills in this area. Low- 1 2 3 4 5 -High Knowledge Knowledge Low- 1 Knowledge 2 Knowledge 3 Knowledge 4 Knowledge 5 -High Use of Practical Applications Use of Practical Applications Low- 1 Use of Practical Applications 2 Use of Practical Applications 3 Use of Practical Applications 4 Use of Practical Applications 5 -High Networking and Relationship Building Networking and Relationship Building Low- 1 Networking and Relationship Building 2 Networking and Relationship Building 3 Networking and Relationship Building 4 Networking and Relationship Building 5 -High Community Mobilization Strategies Community Mobilization Strategies Low- 1 Community Mobilization Strategies 2 Community Mobilization Strategies 3 Community Mobilization Strategies 4 Community Mobilization Strategies 5 -High Other: Other: Low- 1 Other: 2 Other: 3 Other: 4 Other: 5 -High If you selected other, please specify. Question Title * 10. Do you intend to use any of the knowledge, resources, materials, or tools gained through this forum in your own work? Yes No Maybe Please Explain Below Question Title * 11. Please list up to three things you enjoyed about today’s forum. 1. 2. 3. Question Title * 12. Please list up to three things you did not enjoy about today’s forum. 1. 2. 3. Question Title * 13. What topic suggestions do you have for future forums? Alcohol and Youth Impaired Driving Low-risk drinking Guidlines Alcohol Warning Labels Minimum Drinking Age Other If you selected other please specify Question Title * 14. What is the best way for us to let you and your colleagues know about our products, services, and upcoming events? APOLNET Listserv APN Website’s Calendar of Events In person site visit/presentation Through FOCUS/ODAP targeted emails “Le Bloc Note” or other French resources Other If you selected other, please specify. Question Title * 15. Any general comments about today’s forum (topic, format) or this evaluation form (e.g., format, relevance, specific questions) are welcomed below. Question Title * 16. In order to accurately assess our outcome objectives for this forum, we would like to contact you in approximately 3-months for a short follow-up evaluation. If you would like to take part in this process, please CLEARLY PRINT your email address below: Next >>