Skip to content
LONDON: Refractive Surgery Didactic Course (Part 2)
*
1.
Name:
(Required.)
2.
Professional Situation:
Resident
Ophthalmologist
Invited jury member
3.
Did you attend the full course?
Yes
No
If not, why did you leave?
4.
What was your main reason for choosing this course?
Preparation for the EBOD
Content not available in my training centre
Personal interest
5.
How useful would you rate this course?
Very useful
Useful
Not useful
6.
Did all listed faculty members attend this course?
Yes
No
7.
Was this course free from bias?
Yes
No
8.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the didactic aspect of this course:
9.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the presentations in this course:
10.
Please list other courses you would like EBO to organise:
11.
How would you rate the presentation of each faculty member?
Course content
Quality of illustrations
Presentation
Expertise
G. Grabner: Presbyopia
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
R. Applegate: Quality of vision evaluation
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
C. Roberts: Biomechanics of the cornea
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
J. Güell: Refractive reoperations and enhancements
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
V. Katsanevaki: Non-optical complications of LASIK and corneal surgery
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
V. Katsanevaki: Optical complications of refractive surgery
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
R. Nuijts: Complications of phakic IOLs
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
J. Alió: Customised ablational procedures
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
J. Krumeich: Case report
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor
Very Good
Good
Poor