Feedback Survey: Rogers Park Corridor Development Initiative

Question Title

* 4. Which of the following did you participate in? Select all that apply:

Virtual Community Kick-Off Meeting (Oct. 1, 2020)

Virtual Design Session (Oct. 8 or 14, 2020).

Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Design Kit

In-Person Design Session (Oct. 10, 2020 at Gale Elementary)

Survey (in-person with Family Matters or A Just Harvest or online)

Community Design Review Meeting (Nov. 12, 2020 on Zoom)

Advisory Committee (summer/fall 2020)

Report Launch (Mar. 16, 2021)

Question Title

* 5. How did you learn about the CDI process?

Alderwoman's office (newsletter, social media post, etc.)

Metropolitan Planning Council (MPC) (newsletter, social media post, etc.)

Local community organization (newsletter, social media post, etc.)

Friend or neighbor

Flyer or advertisement

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 6. Please evaluate the following aspects of MPC's CDI community process:

	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree Nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Communication was clear, frequent and I understood where to go with questions	Communication was clear, frequent and I understood where to go with questions Strongly Disagree	Communication was clear, frequent and I understood where to go with questions Disagree	Communication was clear, frequent and I understood where to go with questions Neither Agree Nor Disagree	Communication was clear, frequent and I understood where to go with questions Agree	Communication was clear, frequent and I understood where to go with questions Strongly Agree
Information was easy to read and presented in a way that was easy to understand	Information was easy to read and presented in a way that was easy to understand Strongly Disagree	Information was easy to read and presented in a way that was easy to understand Disagree	Information was easy to read and presented in a way that was easy to understand Neither Agree Nor Disagree	Information was easy to read and presented in a way that was easy to understand Agree	Information was easy to read and presented in a way that was easy to understand Strongly Agree
Data presented was useful, easy to understand, and provided valuable context for discussions	Data presented was useful, easy to understand, and provided valuable context for discussions Strongly Disagree	Data presented was useful, easy to understand, and provided valuable context for discussions Disagree	Data presented was useful, easy to understand, and provided valuable context for discussions Neither Agree Nor Disagree	Data presented was useful, easy to understand, and provided valuable context for discussions Agree	Data presented was useful, easy to understand, and provided valuable context for discussions Strongly Agree
The meetings were a good use of my time	The meetings were a good use of my time Strongly Disagree	The meetings were a good use of my time Disagree	The meetings were a good use of my time Neither Agree Nor Disagree	The meetings were a good use of my time Agree	The meetings were a good use of my time Strongly Agree
The topics addressed the development concerns that are important for my community	The topics addressed the development concerns that are important for my community Strongly Disagree	The topics addressed the development concerns that are important for my community Disagree	The topics addressed the development concerns that are important for my community Neither Agree Nor Disagree	The topics addressed the development concerns that are important for my community Agree	The topics addressed the development concerns that are important for my community Strongly Agree
I was satisfied with the opportunity to influence decision-making/recommendations of the process	I was satisfied with the opportunity to influence decision-making/recommendations of the process Strongly Disagree	I was satisfied with the opportunity to influence decision-making/recommendations of the process Disagree	I was satisfied with the opportunity to influence decision-making/recommendations of the process Neither Agree Nor Disagree	I was satisfied with the opportunity to influence decision-making/recommendations of the process Agree	I was satisfied with the opportunity to influence decision-making/recommendations of the process Strongly Agree
I believe the report incorporated the collective feedback accurately	I believe the report incorporated the collective feedback accurately Strongly Disagree	I believe the report incorporated the collective feedback accurately Disagree	I believe the report incorporated the collective feedback accurately Neither Agree Nor Disagree	I believe the report incorporated the collective feedback accurately Agree	I believe the report incorporated the collective feedback accurately Strongly Agree
I felt personally heard throughout the process	I felt personally heard throughout the process Strongly Disagree	I felt personally heard throughout the process Disagree	I felt personally heard throughout the process Neither Agree Nor Disagree	I felt personally heard throughout the process Agree	I felt personally heard throughout the process Strongly Agree

Question Title

* 7. What part of the CDI process did you find most valuable? (such as but not limited to: learning about the development and planning process, building new relationships with community members, becoming more involved in your community, etc.).

Feedback Survey: Rogers Park Corridor Development Initiative

Question Title

* 1. First Name:

Question Title

* 2. Last name:

Question Title

* 3. Email address:

Question Title

* 4. Which of the following did you participate in? Select all that apply:

Question Title

* 5. How did you learn about the CDI process?

Question Title

* 6. Please evaluate the following aspects of MPC's CDI community process:

Question Title

* 7. What part of the CDI process did you find most valuable? (such as but not limited to: learning about the development and planning process, building new relationships with community members, becoming more involved in your community, etc.).

Question Title

* 8. Do you have any other comments or suggestions for MPC or the community planning process in general?