Thank you for participating in this survey. It has been designed to gather the opinions of practicing odontologists and will take no more than 10 minutes of your time

Question Title

1. How would you define quality assurance as pertaining to forensic odontology? (Required.)

Question Title

2. How would you define quality management as pertaining to forensic odontology? (Required.)

Question Title

3. Inter-jurisdictional collaborative trials allow for a comparison of methodologies and approaches used by different practitioners. Unlike proficiency testing, there is no right or wrong answer. Do you see the introduction of Inter-jurisdictional collaborative trials as: (Required.)

Question Title

4. Please list at least two areas of forensic odontology where you believe it would be useful to compare methodologies and/or approaches? (Required.)

Question Title

5. What do you think the issue or issues to be examined are? (Required.)

Question Title

6. How would you frame the question? (Required.)

Have you views on any of the issues below pertaining to forensic odontology?

Question Title

7. Training (Required.)

Question Title

8. Maintaining competency (Required.)

Question Title

9. Peer Review (Required.)

Question Title

10. Proficiency Testing (Required.)

Question Title

11. How many years have you practiced dentistry? (Required.)

Question Title

12. How many forensic odontology cases have you been involved in? (Required.)

Question Title

13. What postgraduate degrees and fellowships do you have, if any? (Required.)

Question Title

14. Are you registered as a specialist forensic odontologist in Australia? (Required.)

Thank you once again.
0 of 14 answered
 

T