Skip to content

“The use of interjurisdictional collaborative trials as a tool for forensic odontology

Thank you for participating in this survey. It has been designed to gather the opinions of practicing odontologists and will take no more than 10 minutes of your time
1.How would you define quality assurance as pertaining to forensic odontology?(Required.)
2.How would you define quality management as pertaining to forensic odontology?(Required.)
3.Inter-jurisdictional collaborative trials allow for a comparison of methodologies and approaches used by different practitioners. Unlike proficiency testing, there is no right or wrong answer. Do you see the introduction of Inter-jurisdictional collaborative trials as:(Required.)
4.Please list at least two areas of forensic odontology where you believe it would be useful to compare methodologies and/or approaches?(Required.)
5.What do you think the issue or issues to be examined are?(Required.)
6.How would you frame the question?(Required.)
Have you views on any of the issues below pertaining to forensic odontology?
7.Training(Required.)
8.Maintaining competency(Required.)
9.Peer Review(Required.)
10.Proficiency Testing(Required.)
11.How many years have you practiced dentistry?(Required.)
12.How many forensic odontology cases have you been involved in?(Required.)
13.What postgraduate degrees and fellowships do you have, if any?(Required.)
14.Are you registered as a specialist forensic odontologist in Australia?(Required.)
Thank you once again.
Current Progress,
0 of 14 answered