Online Learning Evaluation :: Accessible Design as Good Design: A Conversation from the Field Survey

	strongly agree	agree	neutral	disagree	strongly disagree
1. The basic principles of Universal Design as applied in urban landscape architecture.	1. The basic principles of Universal Design as applied in urban landscape architecture. strongly agree	1. The basic principles of Universal Design as applied in urban landscape architecture. agree	1. The basic principles of Universal Design as applied in urban landscape architecture. neutral	1. The basic principles of Universal Design as applied in urban landscape architecture. disagree	1. The basic principles of Universal Design as applied in urban landscape architecture. strongly disagree
2. Specific design choices relative to accessibility and Universal Design for “special” populations, and how they can be of benefit in all design contexts.	2. Specific design choices relative to accessibility and Universal Design for “special” populations, and how they can be of benefit in all design contexts. strongly agree	2. Specific design choices relative to accessibility and Universal Design for “special” populations, and how they can be of benefit in all design contexts. agree	2. Specific design choices relative to accessibility and Universal Design for “special” populations, and how they can be of benefit in all design contexts. neutral	2. Specific design choices relative to accessibility and Universal Design for “special” populations, and how they can be of benefit in all design contexts. disagree	2. Specific design choices relative to accessibility and Universal Design for “special” populations, and how they can be of benefit in all design contexts. strongly disagree
3. Global approaches to the design of streets and public spaces from a “complete streets” perspective.	3. Global approaches to the design of streets and public spaces from a “complete streets” perspective. strongly agree	3. Global approaches to the design of streets and public spaces from a “complete streets” perspective. agree	3. Global approaches to the design of streets and public spaces from a “complete streets” perspective. neutral	3. Global approaches to the design of streets and public spaces from a “complete streets” perspective. disagree	3. Global approaches to the design of streets and public spaces from a “complete streets” perspective. strongly disagree
4. The “carrots” and “sticks” of the regulatory environment and disability rights advocacy, and how both benefit the public at large.	4. The “carrots” and “sticks” of the regulatory environment and disability rights advocacy, and how both benefit the public at large. strongly agree	4. The “carrots” and “sticks” of the regulatory environment and disability rights advocacy, and how both benefit the public at large. agree	4. The “carrots” and “sticks” of the regulatory environment and disability rights advocacy, and how both benefit the public at large. neutral	4. The “carrots” and “sticks” of the regulatory environment and disability rights advocacy, and how both benefit the public at large. disagree	4. The “carrots” and “sticks” of the regulatory environment and disability rights advocacy, and how both benefit the public at large. strongly disagree

strongly agree

agree

neutral

disagree

strongly disagree

1. The basic principles of Universal Design as applied in urban landscape architecture.

1. The basic principles of Universal Design as applied in urban landscape architecture. strongly agree

1. The basic principles of Universal Design as applied in urban landscape architecture. agree

1. The basic principles of Universal Design as applied in urban landscape architecture. neutral

1. The basic principles of Universal Design as applied in urban landscape architecture. disagree

1. The basic principles of Universal Design as applied in urban landscape architecture. strongly disagree

2. Specific design choices relative to accessibility and Universal Design for “special” populations, and how they can be of benefit in all design contexts.

2. Specific design choices relative to accessibility and Universal Design for “special” populations, and how they can be of benefit in all design contexts. strongly agree

2. Specific design choices relative to accessibility and Universal Design for “special” populations, and how they can be of benefit in all design contexts. agree

2. Specific design choices relative to accessibility and Universal Design for “special” populations, and how they can be of benefit in all design contexts. neutral

2. Specific design choices relative to accessibility and Universal Design for “special” populations, and how they can be of benefit in all design contexts. disagree

2. Specific design choices relative to accessibility and Universal Design for “special” populations, and how they can be of benefit in all design contexts. strongly disagree

3. Global approaches to the design of streets and public spaces from a “complete streets” perspective.

3. Global approaches to the design of streets and public spaces from a “complete streets” perspective. strongly agree

3. Global approaches to the design of streets and public spaces from a “complete streets” perspective. agree

3. Global approaches to the design of streets and public spaces from a “complete streets” perspective. neutral

3. Global approaches to the design of streets and public spaces from a “complete streets” perspective. disagree

3. Global approaches to the design of streets and public spaces from a “complete streets” perspective. strongly disagree

4. The “carrots” and “sticks” of the regulatory environment and disability rights advocacy, and how both benefit the public at large.

4. The “carrots” and “sticks” of the regulatory environment and disability rights advocacy, and how both benefit the public at large. strongly agree

4. The “carrots” and “sticks” of the regulatory environment and disability rights advocacy, and how both benefit the public at large. agree

4. The “carrots” and “sticks” of the regulatory environment and disability rights advocacy, and how both benefit the public at large. neutral

4. The “carrots” and “sticks” of the regulatory environment and disability rights advocacy, and how both benefit the public at large. disagree

4. The “carrots” and “sticks” of the regulatory environment and disability rights advocacy, and how both benefit the public at large. strongly disagree

Question Title

* 2. The presentation, text, and graphics were clearly represented.

strongly agree

agree

neutral

disagree

strongly disagree

strongly agree

agree

neutral

disagree

strongly disagree

Question Title

* 3. The topic will be of value to my professional practice.

strongly agree

agree

neutral

disagree

strongly disagree

strongly agree

agree

neutral

disagree

strongly disagree

Question Title

* 4. Please comment on the following statement:

This presentation met my expectations.

strongly agree

agree

neutral

disagree

strongly disagree

strongly agree

agree

neutral

disagree

strongly disagree

Please explain

Question Title

* 5. What did you like about the presentation?

Content

Speaker(s)

Length of presentation

Fit my schedule

None of the above

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 6. Please rate the presentation's speakers:

	excellent	good	average	fair	poor
Sean Sanger	Sean Sanger excellent	Sean Sanger good	Sean Sanger average	Sean Sanger fair	Sean Sanger poor
Barbara Knecht	Barbara Knecht excellent	Barbara Knecht good	Barbara Knecht average	Barbara Knecht fair	Barbara Knecht poor
Josh Safdie	Josh Safdie excellent	Josh Safdie good	Josh Safdie average	Josh Safdie fair	Josh Safdie poor
Stuart Seaborn	Stuart Seaborn excellent	Stuart Seaborn good	Stuart Seaborn average	Stuart Seaborn fair	Stuart Seaborn poor

Question Title

* 7. Any suggestions or comments to improve future presentations?

Question Title

* 8. ASLA is always interested in topics for new Online Learning presentations that provide practicing landscape architects with information about new and evolving practices and products. Please share your ideas here, and, if possible, the names of any experts who could give these presentations.

Question Title

* 1. In this presentation on accessible design, I gained a greater understanding of:

Question Title

* 2. The presentation, text, and graphics were clearly represented.

Question Title

* 3. The topic will be of value to my professional practice.

Question Title

* 4. Please comment on the following statement: This presentation met my expectations.

Question Title

* 5. What did you like about the presentation?

Question Title

* 6. Please rate the presentation's speakers:

Question Title

* 7. Any suggestions or comments to improve future presentations?

Question Title

* 8. ASLA is always interested in topics for new Online Learning presentations that provide practicing landscape architects with information about new and evolving practices and products. Please share your ideas here, and, if possible, the names of any experts who could give these presentations.

* 4. Please comment on the following statement:

This presentation met my expectations.