FOCIS Advanced Course 2017 - Evaluation - Monday, February 20, 2017

Please rate each Advanced Course in Basic and Clinical Immunology session and speaker.

Question Title

* 1. Overview of the Immune System – Shiv Pillai, MD, PhD

	Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Very Poor	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Poor	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Average	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Good	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Excellent
Speaker ability to be clear and concise	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Very Poor	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Poor	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Average	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Good	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Excellent
Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Very Poor	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Poor	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Average	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Good	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Excellent
Quality of the slides	Quality of the slides Very Poor	Quality of the slides Poor	Quality of the slides Average	Quality of the slides Good	Quality of the slides Excellent
Topic relevance to your field	Topic relevance to your field Very Poor	Topic relevance to your field Poor	Topic relevance to your field Average	Topic relevance to your field Good	Topic relevance to your field Excellent
Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Very Poor	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Poor	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Average	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Good	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Excellent

Question Title

* 2. Did you perceive bias in Dr. Pillai's presentation?

Yes

No

If yes, please explain

Question Title

* 3. Additional comments/feedback on Dr. Pillai's presentation:

Question Title

* 4. Innate Immunity (Molecules) - Stephanie Eisenbarth, MD, PhD

	Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Very Poor	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Poor	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Average	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Good	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Excellent
Speaker ability to be clear and concise	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Very Poor	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Poor	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Average	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Good	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Excellent
Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Very Poor	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Poor	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Average	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Good	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Excellent
Quality of the slides	Quality of the slides Very Poor	Quality of the slides Poor	Quality of the slides Average	Quality of the slides Good	Quality of the slides Excellent
Topic relevance to your field	Topic relevance to your field Very Poor	Topic relevance to your field Poor	Topic relevance to your field Average	Topic relevance to your field Good	Topic relevance to your field Excellent
Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Very Poor	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Poor	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Average	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Good	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Excellent

Question Title

* 5. Did you perceive bias in Eisenbarth's presentation?

Yes

No

If yes, please explain

Question Title

* 6. Additional comments/feedback on Dr. Eisenbarth's presentation:

Question Title

* 7. Antigen Processing and Presentation - Kenneth Rock, MD

	Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Very Poor	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Poor	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Average	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Good	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Excellent
Speaker ability to be clear and concise	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Very Poor	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Poor	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Average	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Good	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Excellent
Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Very Poor	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Poor	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Average	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Good	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Excellent
Quality of the slides	Quality of the slides Very Poor	Quality of the slides Poor	Quality of the slides Average	Quality of the slides Good	Quality of the slides Excellent
Topic relevance to your field	Topic relevance to your field Very Poor	Topic relevance to your field Poor	Topic relevance to your field Average	Topic relevance to your field Good	Topic relevance to your field Excellent
Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Very Poor	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Poor	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Average	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Good	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Excellent

Question Title

* 8. Did you perceive bias in Dr. Rock's presentation?

Yes

No

If yes, please explain:

Question Title

* 9. Additional comments/feedback on Dr. Rock's presentation:

Question Title

* 10. Antibodies and Disease – Shiv Pillai, MD, PhD

	Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Very Poor	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Poor	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Average	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Good	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Excellent
Speaker ability to be clear and concise	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Very Poor	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Poor	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Average	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Good	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Excellent
Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Very Poor	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Poor	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Average	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Good	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Excellent
Quality of the slides	Quality of the slides Very Poor	Quality of the slides Poor	Quality of the slides Average	Quality of the slides Good	Quality of the slides Excellent
Topic relevance to your field	Topic relevance to your field Very Poor	Topic relevance to your field Poor	Topic relevance to your field Average	Topic relevance to your field Good	Topic relevance to your field Excellent
Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Very Poor	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Poor	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Average	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Good	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Excellent

Question Title

* 11. Did you perceive bias in Dr. Pillai's presentation?

Yes

No

If yes, please explain:

Question Title

* 12. Additional comments/feedback on Dr. Pillai's presentation:

Question Title

* 13. Innate Immunity (Cells) - Stephanie Eisenbarth, MD, PhD

	Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Very Poor	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Poor	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Average	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Good	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Excellent
Speaker ability to be clear and concise	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Very Poor	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Poor	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Average	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Good	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Excellent
Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Very Poor	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Poor	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Average	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Good	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Excellent
Quality of the slides	Quality of the slides Very Poor	Quality of the slides Poor	Quality of the slides Average	Quality of the slides Good	Quality of the slides Excellent
Topic relevance to your field	Topic relevance to your field Very Poor	Topic relevance to your field Poor	Topic relevance to your field Average	Topic relevance to your field Good	Topic relevance to your field Excellent
Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Very Poor	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Poor	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Average	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Good	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Excellent

Question Title

* 14. Did you perceive bias in Eisenbarth's presentation?

Yes

No

If yes, please explain

Question Title

* 15. Additional comments/feedback on Dr. Eisenbarth's presentation:

Question Title

* 16. T Cell Activation and Costimulation – Abul K. Abbas, MD

	Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Very Poor	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Poor	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Average	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Good	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Excellent
Speaker ability to be clear and concise	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Very Poor	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Poor	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Average	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Good	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Excellent
Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Very Poor	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Poor	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Average	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Good	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Excellent
Quality of the slides	Quality of the slides Very Poor	Quality of the slides Poor	Quality of the slides Average	Quality of the slides Good	Quality of the slides Excellent
Topic relevance to your field	Topic relevance to your field Very Poor	Topic relevance to your field Poor	Topic relevance to your field Average	Topic relevance to your field Good	Topic relevance to your field Excellent
Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Very Poor	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Poor	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Average	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Good	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Excellent

Question Title

* 17. Did you perceive bias in Dr. Abbas' presentation?

Yes

No

If yes, please explain:

Question Title

* 18. Additional comments/feedback on Dr. Abbas' presentation:

Question Title

* 19. NK Cells – Lewis Lanier, PhD

	Very Poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Very Poor	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Poor	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Average	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Good	Speaker knowledge and expertise in the subject area Excellent
Speaker ability to be clear and concise	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Very Poor	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Poor	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Average	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Good	Speaker ability to be clear and concise Excellent
Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Very Poor	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Poor	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Average	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Good	Speaker ability to maintain the interest of the audience Excellent
Quality of the slides	Quality of the slides Very Poor	Quality of the slides Poor	Quality of the slides Average	Quality of the slides Good	Quality of the slides Excellent
Topic relevance to your field	Topic relevance to your field Very Poor	Topic relevance to your field Poor	Topic relevance to your field Average	Topic relevance to your field Good	Topic relevance to your field Excellent
Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Very Poor	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Poor	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Average	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Good	Appropriateness of the quantity of the material presented Excellent

Question Title

* 20. Did you perceive bias in Dr. Lanier's presentation?

Yes

No

If yes, please explain:

Question Title

* 21. Additional comments/feedback on Lanier's presentation: