A Three-Part Ethics Program: Working with Justice- Involved Youth; Ethics in Medical Settings; Understanding the Expanded Duty to Warn in PA

Original broadcast date: January 26, 2021

Dear Colleague:

Thank you for attending the Education and Consultative Services of UPMC Western Psychiatric Hospital sponsored training listed above. We would ask you to take a few minutes to complete this evaluation to help us improve the quality of our programs.

Question Title

* 1. Overall Activity Assessment

	Very Low	Low	Moderate	High	Very HIgh
To what extent were you satisfied with the overall quality of the activity?	To what extent were you satisfied with the overall quality of the activity? Very Low	To what extent were you satisfied with the overall quality of the activity? Low	To what extent were you satisfied with the overall quality of the activity? Moderate	To what extent were you satisfied with the overall quality of the activity? High	To what extent were you satisfied with the overall quality of the activity? Very HIgh
To what extent was the content of the program relevant to your practice?	To what extent was the content of the program relevant to your practice? Very Low	To what extent was the content of the program relevant to your practice? Low	To what extent was the content of the program relevant to your practice? Moderate	To what extent was the content of the program relevant to your practice? High	To what extent was the content of the program relevant to your practice? Very HIgh
To what extent will you make a change in practice/professional responsibilities?	To what extent will you make a change in practice/professional responsibilities? Very Low	To what extent will you make a change in practice/professional responsibilities? Low	To what extent will you make a change in practice/professional responsibilities? Moderate	To what extent will you make a change in practice/professional responsibilities? High	To what extent will you make a change in practice/professional responsibilities? Very HIgh

Question Title

* 2. Interprofessional Collaboration Assessment:
Please rate the following as it most accurately reflects your opinion after participating in this activity: The Patient's family or significant other, when appropriate, are part of the IP team. The word "patient" has been employed to represent client, resident, and service users. The term "care" includes intervention, treatment, therapy, evaluation, etc.

	Very Low	Low	Moderate	High	Very HIgh
I am better able to promote effective communication among members on an interprofessional (IP) team.	I am better able to promote effective communication among members on an interprofessional (IP) team. Very Low	I am better able to promote effective communication among members on an interprofessional (IP) team. Low	I am better able to promote effective communication among members on an interprofessional (IP) team. Moderate	I am better able to promote effective communication among members on an interprofessional (IP) team. High	I am better able to promote effective communication among members on an interprofessional (IP) team. Very HIgh
I am better able to work effectively with an interprofessional IP team to enhance care.	I am better able to work effectively with an interprofessional IP team to enhance care. Very Low	I am better able to work effectively with an interprofessional IP team to enhance care. Low	I am better able to work effectively with an interprofessional IP team to enhance care. Moderate	I am better able to work effectively with an interprofessional IP team to enhance care. High	I am better able to work effectively with an interprofessional IP team to enhance care. Very HIgh
I have a better understanding of the abilities and contributions of IP team members.	I have a better understanding of the abilities and contributions of IP team members. Very Low	I have a better understanding of the abilities and contributions of IP team members. Low	I have a better understanding of the abilities and contributions of IP team members. Moderate	I have a better understanding of the abilities and contributions of IP team members. High	I have a better understanding of the abilities and contributions of IP team members. Very HIgh
I am more likely to consider the ideas of IP team members.	I am more likely to consider the ideas of IP team members. Very Low	I am more likely to consider the ideas of IP team members. Low	I am more likely to consider the ideas of IP team members. Moderate	I am more likely to consider the ideas of IP team members. High	I am more likely to consider the ideas of IP team members. Very HIgh
I am more likely to develop an effective care plan with IP team member.	I am more likely to develop an effective care plan with IP team member. Very Low	I am more likely to develop an effective care plan with IP team member. Low	I am more likely to develop an effective care plan with IP team member. Moderate	I am more likely to develop an effective care plan with IP team member. High	I am more likely to develop an effective care plan with IP team member. Very HIgh

Question Title

* 3. Did this activity present scientifically rigorous, unbiased, and balanced information?

Yes

If no, please describe

Question Title

* 4. What new strategies will your interprofessional care team implement?

Question Title

* 5. List 2 or more changes you will implement into your practice as a results of this activity?

Question Title

* 6. How did you hear about this training?

Brochure/announcement in email

Education and Consultative Services website

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 7. If you are from PA, in which county do you work?

Adams County

Allegheny County

Armstrong County

Beaver County

Bedford County

Berks County

Blair County

Bradford County

Bucks County

Butler County

Cambria County

Cameron County

Carbon County

Centre County

Chester County

Clarion County

Clearfield County

Clinton County

Columbia County

Crawford County

Cumberland County

Dauphin County

Delaware County

Elk County

Erie County

Fayette County

Forest County

Franklin County

Fulton County

Greene County

Huntingdon County

Indiana County

Jefferson County

Juniata County

Lackawanna County

Lancaster County

Lawrence County

Lebanon County

Lehigh County

Luzerne County

Lycoming County

McKean County

Mercer County

Mifflin County

Monroe County

Montgomery County

Montour County

Northampton County

Northumberland County

Perry County

Philadelphia County

Pike County

Potter County

Schuylkill County

Snyder County

Somerset County

Sullivan County

Susquehanna County

Tioga County

Union County

Venango County

Warren County

Washington County

Wayne County

Westmoreland County

Wyoming County

York County

Not from PA

Question Title

* 8. Highest level of education attained.

HS Diploma

Associates Degree

Nursing Diploma

Bachelor's Degree

Master's Degree

Doctoral Degree

MD or DO

Question Title

* 9. Please indicate your primary field.

Administration

Certified Peer Specialist

Child/Adolescent

Clergy/Chaplain

Counseling

Drug and Alcohol

Education

Geriatric Care

Medicine

Nursing

Other

Other Mental Health Professional

Peer Counseling

Pharmacy

Psychiatry

Psychology

Social Work

Question Title

* 10. Please indicate your primary job title

Aide

Case Manager/Service Coordinator

Caseworker

Certified Peer Specialist

Clergy/Chaplain

Clerical

Counselor/Therapist

County MH/ID Administrator

Executive Director

Intake/Assessment Worker

Medical Records

Nurse

Other

Other Physician

Program Director/Coordinator

Psychiatrist

Psychologist

Residential Program Worker

Social Worker

Question Title

* 11. Please indicate your primary work setting.

Drug and Alcohol Program

Private Practice

Community Behavioral Health Agency

Social Services Agency

Other State Agency

General Hospital

Psychiatric Hospital

Veterans Administration

Academic/University

Managed Care Organization

County MH/1D Program

Corrections

School Based (K-12)

Advocacy/Consumer/Family Association

Other

Question Title

* 12. If applicable, please rate the quality of the video.

Poor

Adequate

Good

N/A

Question Title

* 13. If applicable, please rate the physical facilities for the following:

	Poor	Adequate	Good	N/A
Comfort	Comfort Poor	Comfort Adequate	Comfort Good	Comfort N/A
Accessibility	Accessibility Poor	Accessibility Adequate	Accessibility Good	Accessibility N/A
Meeting Space	Meeting Space Poor	Meeting Space Adequate	Meeting Space Good	Meeting Space N/A
Visibility of Audio-Visuals	Visibility of Audio-Visuals Poor	Visibility of Audio-Visuals Adequate	Visibility of Audio-Visuals Good	Visibility of Audio-Visuals N/A
Acoustics	Acoustics Poor	Acoustics Adequate	Acoustics Good	Acoustics N/A

Question Title

* 14. Overall program: To what extent did the following contribute to your learning and understanding of the subject?

Question Title

* 15. Teaching effectiveness: Darcy Moschenross, MD, PhD

	Not At All	To A Small Degree	To A Moderate Degree	To A High Degree	N/A
Demonstrated knowledge of the subject	Demonstrated knowledge of the subject Not At All	Demonstrated knowledge of the subject To A Small Degree	Demonstrated knowledge of the subject To A Moderate Degree	Demonstrated knowledge of the subject To A High Degree	Demonstrated knowledge of the subject N/A
Communicated effectively	Communicated effectively Not At All	Communicated effectively To A Small Degree	Communicated effectively To A Moderate Degree	Communicated effectively To A High Degree	Communicated effectively N/A

Question Title

* 16. How much did the presentation meet the following objectives? - Darcy Moschenross, MD, PhD

	Not at all	Adequately	A great deal	N/A
Discuss the basic ethical principles guiding medical decision making.	Discuss the basic ethical principles guiding medical decision making. Not at all	Discuss the basic ethical principles guiding medical decision making. Adequately	Discuss the basic ethical principles guiding medical decision making. A great deal	Discuss the basic ethical principles guiding medical decision making. N/A
Recognize methods for tackling challenging clinical decisions.	Recognize methods for tackling challenging clinical decisions. Not at all	Recognize methods for tackling challenging clinical decisions. Adequately	Recognize methods for tackling challenging clinical decisions. A great deal	Recognize methods for tackling challenging clinical decisions. N/A
Accurately document situations involving ethical and challenging medical and clinical decisions.	Accurately document situations involving ethical and challenging medical and clinical decisions. Not at all	Accurately document situations involving ethical and challenging medical and clinical decisions. Adequately	Accurately document situations involving ethical and challenging medical and clinical decisions. A great deal	Accurately document situations involving ethical and challenging medical and clinical decisions. N/A

Question Title

* 17. Teaching effectiveness: Jessica Gahr, MA

	Not At All	To A Small Degree	To A Moderate Degree	To A High Degree	N/A
Demonstrated knowledge of the subject	Demonstrated knowledge of the subject Not At All	Demonstrated knowledge of the subject To A Small Degree	Demonstrated knowledge of the subject To A Moderate Degree	Demonstrated knowledge of the subject To A High Degree	Demonstrated knowledge of the subject N/A
Communicated effectively	Communicated effectively Not At All	Communicated effectively To A Small Degree	Communicated effectively To A Moderate Degree	Communicated effectively To A High Degree	Communicated effectively N/A

Question Title

* 18. How much did the presentation meet the following objectives? -
Jessica Gahr, MA

	Not at all	Adequately	A great deal	N/A
Discuss special considerations to limits to confidentiality when working with juvenile justice-involved youth.	Discuss special considerations to limits to confidentiality when working with juvenile justice-involved youth. Not at all	Discuss special considerations to limits to confidentiality when working with juvenile justice-involved youth. Adequately	Discuss special considerations to limits to confidentiality when working with juvenile justice-involved youth. A great deal	Discuss special considerations to limits to confidentiality when working with juvenile justice-involved youth. N/A
Discuss practical techniques to discuss limits to confidentiality with juvenile justice-involved youth while maintaining therapeutic rapport.	Discuss practical techniques to discuss limits to confidentiality with juvenile justice-involved youth while maintaining therapeutic rapport. Not at all	Discuss practical techniques to discuss limits to confidentiality with juvenile justice-involved youth while maintaining therapeutic rapport. Adequately	Discuss practical techniques to discuss limits to confidentiality with juvenile justice-involved youth while maintaining therapeutic rapport. A great deal	Discuss practical techniques to discuss limits to confidentiality with juvenile justice-involved youth while maintaining therapeutic rapport. N/A
Identify the potential advantages and disadvantages of being an active participant on a multi-disciplinary team.	Identify the potential advantages and disadvantages of being an active participant on a multi-disciplinary team. Not at all	Identify the potential advantages and disadvantages of being an active participant on a multi-disciplinary team. Adequately	Identify the potential advantages and disadvantages of being an active participant on a multi-disciplinary team. A great deal	Identify the potential advantages and disadvantages of being an active participant on a multi-disciplinary team. N/A

Question Title

* 19. Teaching effectiveness: John Rozel, MD

	Not At All	To A Small Degree	To A Moderate Degree	To A High Degree	N/A
Demonstrated knowledge of the subject	Demonstrated knowledge of the subject Not At All	Demonstrated knowledge of the subject To A Small Degree	Demonstrated knowledge of the subject To A Moderate Degree	Demonstrated knowledge of the subject To A High Degree	Demonstrated knowledge of the subject N/A
Communicated effectively	Communicated effectively Not At All	Communicated effectively To A Small Degree	Communicated effectively To A Moderate Degree	Communicated effectively To A High Degree	Communicated effectively N/A

Question Title

* 20. How much did the presentation meet the following objectives? - John Rozel, MD

	Not at all	Adequately	A great deal	N/A
Contrast duties to protect and duties to warn	Contrast duties to protect and duties to warn Not at all	Contrast duties to protect and duties to warn Adequately	Contrast duties to protect and duties to warn A great deal	Contrast duties to protect and duties to warn N/A
Describe the essential criteria of duties to third parties in Pennsylvania as enumerated in under Emerich and Mass	Describe the essential criteria of duties to third parties in Pennsylvania as enumerated in under Emerich and Mass Not at all	Describe the essential criteria of duties to third parties in Pennsylvania as enumerated in under Emerich and Mass Adequately	Describe the essential criteria of duties to third parties in Pennsylvania as enumerated in under Emerich and Mass A great deal	Describe the essential criteria of duties to third parties in Pennsylvania as enumerated in under Emerich and Mass N/A
Distinguish liability related to disclosure of information and harm by a third party	Distinguish liability related to disclosure of information and harm by a third party Not at all	Distinguish liability related to disclosure of information and harm by a third party Adequately	Distinguish liability related to disclosure of information and harm by a third party A great deal	Distinguish liability related to disclosure of information and harm by a third party N/A
Identify three resources to help with clinical decision making when faced by cases with violence risk	Identify three resources to help with clinical decision making when faced by cases with violence risk Not at all	Identify three resources to help with clinical decision making when faced by cases with violence risk Adequately	Identify three resources to help with clinical decision making when faced by cases with violence risk A great deal	Identify three resources to help with clinical decision making when faced by cases with violence risk N/A

Question Title

* 21. Which topics would you like to see covered in future CE programs?

Question Title

* 22. What suggestions do you have for us to improve our trainings/additional comments?

Question Title

* 23. Please indicate if you are applying for continuing education (CE) credits.

LSW/LCSW/LPC/LMFT

APA

NCC

Act 48 (if applicable)

General CEU

CADC/CCDP (if applicable)

CME

I am not applying for CE/CME credits

	Not at all	Moderately	A great deal	N/A
The lecture	The lecture Not at all	The lecture Moderately	The lecture A great deal	The lecture N/A
Group discussion (if applicable)	Group discussion (if applicable) Not at all	Group discussion (if applicable) Moderately	Group discussion (if applicable) A great deal	Group discussion (if applicable) N/A
Audio visuals	Audio visuals Not at all	Audio visuals Moderately	Audio visuals A great deal	Audio visuals N/A
Handouts (if applicable)	Handouts (if applicable) Not at all	Handouts (if applicable) Moderately	Handouts (if applicable) A great deal	Handouts (if applicable) N/A
To what extent was the program stimulating and interesting?	To what extent was the program stimulating and interesting? Not at all	To what extent was the program stimulating and interesting? Moderately	To what extent was the program stimulating and interesting? A great deal	To what extent was the program stimulating and interesting? N/A
To what degree were the presenters prepared?	To what degree were the presenters prepared? Not at all	To what degree were the presenters prepared? Moderately	To what degree were the presenters prepared? A great deal	To what degree were the presenters prepared? N/A
To what degree was the content applicable to your work setting?	To what degree was the content applicable to your work setting? Not at all	To what degree was the content applicable to your work setting? Moderately	To what degree was the content applicable to your work setting? A great deal	To what degree was the content applicable to your work setting? N/A
To what degree were the physical facilities conducive to learning? (if applicable)	To what degree were the physical facilities conducive to learning? (if applicable) Not at all	To what degree were the physical facilities conducive to learning? (if applicable) Moderately	To what degree were the physical facilities conducive to learning? (if applicable) A great deal	To what degree were the physical facilities conducive to learning? (if applicable) N/A
To what extent was there a balance between the lecture and discussion (if applicable)	To what extent was there a balance between the lecture and discussion (if applicable) Not at all	To what extent was there a balance between the lecture and discussion (if applicable) Moderately	To what extent was there a balance between the lecture and discussion (if applicable) A great deal	To what extent was there a balance between the lecture and discussion (if applicable) N/A
To what extent were you able to see and hear the audio visuals (if applicable)	To what extent were you able to see and hear the audio visuals (if applicable) Not at all	To what extent were you able to see and hear the audio visuals (if applicable) Moderately	To what extent were you able to see and hear the audio visuals (if applicable) A great deal	To what extent were you able to see and hear the audio visuals (if applicable) N/A
To what extent were the format and sequence appropriate for the material covered?	To what extent were the format and sequence appropriate for the material covered? Not at all	To what extent were the format and sequence appropriate for the material covered? Moderately	To what extent were the format and sequence appropriate for the material covered? A great deal	To what extent were the format and sequence appropriate for the material covered? N/A
To what extent were you able to participate in the program (if applicable)	To what extent were you able to participate in the program (if applicable) Not at all	To what extent were you able to participate in the program (if applicable) Moderately	To what extent were you able to participate in the program (if applicable) A great deal	To what extent were you able to participate in the program (if applicable) N/A
How much did you learn as a result of this continuing educate (CE) program?	How much did you learn as a result of this continuing educate (CE) program? Not at all	How much did you learn as a result of this continuing educate (CE) program? Moderately	How much did you learn as a result of this continuing educate (CE) program? A great deal	How much did you learn as a result of this continuing educate (CE) program? N/A
How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?	How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? Not at all	How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? Moderately	How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? A great deal	How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? N/A

Question Title

* 1. Overall Activity Assessment

Question Title

Question Title

* 3. Did this activity present scientifically rigorous, unbiased, and balanced information?

Question Title

* 4. What new strategies will your interprofessional care team implement?

Question Title

* 5. List 2 or more changes you will implement into your practice as a results of this activity?

Question Title

* 6. How did you hear about this training?

Question Title

* 7. If you are from PA, in which county do you work?

Question Title

* 8. Highest level of education attained.

Question Title

* 9. Please indicate your primary field.

Question Title

* 10. Please indicate your primary job title

Question Title

* 11. Please indicate your primary work setting.

Question Title

* 12. If applicable, please rate the quality of the video.

Question Title

* 13. If applicable, please rate the physical facilities for the following:

Question Title

* 14. Overall program: To what extent did the following contribute to your learning and understanding of the subject?

Question Title

* 15. Teaching effectiveness: Darcy Moschenross, MD, PhD

Question Title

* 16. How much did the presentation meet the following objectives? - Darcy Moschenross, MD, PhD

Question Title

* 17. Teaching effectiveness: Jessica Gahr, MA

Question Title

* 18. How much did the presentation meet the following objectives? - Jessica Gahr, MA

Question Title

* 19. Teaching effectiveness: John Rozel, MD

Question Title

* 20. How much did the presentation meet the following objectives? - John Rozel, MD

Question Title

* 21. Which topics would you like to see covered in future CE programs?

Question Title

* 22. What suggestions do you have for us to improve our trainings/additional comments?

Question Title

* 23. Please indicate if you are applying for continuing education (CE) credits.

Question Title

* 24. Please add your name if requesting CE credits. This will not be shared with the course director.

Question Title

* 25. Please add your email address if requesting CE credits.

* 18. How much did the presentation meet the following objectives? -
Jessica Gahr, MA