1. Default Section

* 1. Programming Experience

* 2. Frameworks Experience

* 3. About Java I feel:

* 4. I've heard that the onTap framework is:

* 5. I use frameworks regularly and in choosing framework(s) for an application, these features are:

  Undesirable Neutral / Don't Know Nice to have Important Required
Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
Scaffolding Tools for CRUD Tasks
AJAX Integration
SES URLs
Easy to Learn / Use
Object Oriented Architecture (OO)
Scalability
Extensibility (plugins / filters)
User Management / Security Features
Convention over Configuration (CoC)
XML configuration files
Full Stack (automates common tasks)
Dependency Injection (IoC / DI)
Printed Books
Object-Relational Mapping (ORM)
Object Caching Services (RAM)
Commercial Support Contracts
Aspect Oriented Programming (AOP)
Community Wiki
Thorough Documentation
Video Tutorials

* 6. I've seen the installation videos for the onTap framework.

* 7. I heard about the onTap framework through:

* 8. What versions of the onTap framework have you tried?

* 9. I tried an *older* version of the framework and found it to be (skip this question if you have not used the framework or if you have only used 3.2):

  Don't know Poor Acceptable Good Excellent!
Thorough Documentation
Gentle Learning Curve
Technical Support
Support for OO Techniques
Extensibility (plugins)
Stability
Scalability
Community Involvement
Support for Procedural Techniques

* 10. I've tried onTap framework 3.2 recently and find it to be (skip this question if you have not tried the most recent version):

  Don't Know Poor Acceptable Good Excellent!
Support for Procedural Techniques
Scalability
Stability
Community Involvement
Extensibility (plugins)
Gentle Learning Curve
Thorough Documentation
Technical Support
Support for OO Techniques

T