1. Default Section

* 1. Programming Experience

* 2. Frameworks Experience

* 3. About Java I feel:

* 4. I've heard that the onTap framework is:

* 5. I use frameworks regularly and in choosing framework(s) for an application, these features are:

  Undesirable Neutral / Don't Know Nice to have Important Required
Object Caching Services (RAM)
Extensibility (plugins / filters)
Object-Relational Mapping (ORM)
Easy to Learn / Use
Object Oriented Architecture (OO)
User Management / Security Features
Printed Books
Thorough Documentation
Aspect Oriented Programming (AOP)
Scaffolding Tools for CRUD Tasks
Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
SES URLs
Scalability
Community Wiki
Commercial Support Contracts
Full Stack (automates common tasks)
Dependency Injection (IoC / DI)
AJAX Integration
Convention over Configuration (CoC)
XML configuration files
Video Tutorials

* 6. I've seen the installation videos for the onTap framework.

* 7. I heard about the onTap framework through:

* 8. What versions of the onTap framework have you tried?

* 9. I tried an *older* version of the framework and found it to be (skip this question if you have not used the framework or if you have only used 3.2):

  Don't know Poor Acceptable Good Excellent!
Support for Procedural Techniques
Community Involvement
Technical Support
Thorough Documentation
Support for OO Techniques
Gentle Learning Curve
Scalability
Extensibility (plugins)
Stability

* 10. I've tried onTap framework 3.2 recently and find it to be (skip this question if you have not tried the most recent version):

  Don't Know Poor Acceptable Good Excellent!
Scalability
Stability
Extensibility (plugins)
Gentle Learning Curve
Support for Procedural Techniques
Community Involvement
Technical Support
Thorough Documentation
Support for OO Techniques

T