1. Overall Evaluation

1. What is your primary specialty?

2. What is your level of training?

3. Overall evaluation of the activity:

4. Quality of the educational content:

5. Was the activity responsive to your needs?

6. Was the activity relevant to your practice?

7. Did this activity increase your knowledge and/or skills in delivering patient care?

8. Were the following objectives met?

  Yes No
Apply both education and research findings to your emergency medicine practice
Apply key statistical indicators in analyzing research results
Utilize acceptable research methods and study design in the development of research projects
Realize the details of the framework for EBM so that intended practice improvements are vetted through this prism

9. In your opinion, were any presenters biased in their discussion of any commercial products or services?

10. How will you change your clinical practice as a result of this activity?

11. Which topics or lecturers were the most useful?

12. Which topics or lecturers were the least useful?

13. Please suggest other topics that should be covered in future activities.

14. Please evaluate the amount of social activities and networking opportunities (opening reception, coffee breaks, banquet, wine reception)

15. What would you like to see more of?

16. Should the wine and cheese poster session be included in future Annual Meetings?

17. Do you prefer having an open lunch hour at the expense of less didactic programming time at the meeting?

18. Do you prefer no sessions being scheduled at the same time (competing) as poster presentations?

19. Was the organization of "tracks" helpful in guiding your experience and interest in the meeting?

20. Please evaluate the:

  More time for research Just right More time for didactics unsure
Balance between research and didactic programming

21. Please evaluate the:

  Excellent Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Somewhat Satisfactory Not Satisfactory Did Not Attend
Innovations in Emergency Medicine Education Exhibits

22. Please evaluate the:

  Excellent Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Somewhat Satisfactory Not Satisfactory Did Not Attend
Oral Papers

23. Please evaluate the:

  Excellent Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Somewhat Satisfactory Not Satisfactory Did Not Attend
Moderated Papers

24. Please evaluate the:

  Excellent Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Somewhat Satisfactory Not Satisfactory Did Not Attend
Poster Presentations

25. Please evaluate the:

  Excellent Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Somewhat Satisfactory Not Satisfactory Did Not Attend
CPC

26. Please evaluate the:

  Excellent Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Somewhat Satisfactory Not Satisfactory Did Not Attend
Photo Displays

27. Keynote Speaker

  Very Important Important Neutral Unimportant Very Unimportant
How important is a keynote speaker to you?

28. Suggestions for future keynote speakers:

29. What electronic formats or enhancements would you like to see at the meeting? (Check all that Apply)

30. Please evaluate:

  Excellent Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Somewhat Satisfactory Not Satisfactory Did Not Submit paper for this meeting
This year's system for abstract submission

31. Please evaluate:

  Excellent Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Somewhat Satisfactory Not Satisfactory N/A
What did you think of the ability to download a program itinerary to your phone/PDA?

32. Recognizing that exhibitors bring revenue to the meeting and Society:

  Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
How do you feel about the integration of exhibits into the Annual Meeting?

33. Other comments or suggestions:

T