Final Assessment

The ACOG District II 2013 Annual Meeting provides the opportunity to facilitate the professional development of women’s health care professionals by offering a scientific program designed to provide comprehensive clinical skills-based education.

District II’s mission is to provide its members with the latest skills, knowledge, and resources to offer the highest quality health care for women.

Over the past three days, participants have engaged in an interactive program that included:

* Ample case studies
* Group and panel discussions
* Compelling presentations from distinguished faculty across the country

Please complete this Final Assessment to help inform future programming.

1. Yvonne Thornton, MD, MPH, FACOG, FACS

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

2. Disclosed whether or not relationship with industry exists

3. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

4. Scott Hayworth, MD, FACOG

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

5. Disclosed whether or not relationship with industry exists

6. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

7. James N. Martin, Jr., MD, FACOG

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

8. Disclosed whether or not relationship with industry exists

9. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

10. Mark S. Defrancesco, MD, MBA, FACOG

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

11. Disclosed whether or not relationship with industry exists

12. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

13. Mary E. D'Alton, MD, FACOG

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

14. Disclosed whether or not relationship with industry exists

15. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

16. John P. Keats, MD, CPE, FACOG, FACPE

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

17. Disclosed whether or not relationship with industry exists

18. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

19. Cynthia Chazotte, MD, FACOG

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

20. Disclosed whether or not relationship with industry exists

21. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

22. Ronald T. Burkman, MD, FACOG

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

23. Disclosed whether or not relationship with industry exists

24. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

25. Jason D. Wright, MD, FACOG

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

26. Disclosed whether or not relationship with industry exists

27. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

28. Mark I. Evans, MD, FACOG, FACMG

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

29. Disclosed whether or not relationship with industry exists

30. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

31. Susan Klugman, MD, FACOG, FACMG

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

32. Disclosed whether or not a relationship with industry exists

33. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

34. Noah D. Kauff, MD, FACOG

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

35. Disclosed whether or not relationship with industry exists

36. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

37. Angela G. Arnold, MS, CGC

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

38. Disclosed whether or not relationship with industry exists

39. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

40. Robert A. Soslow, MD

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

41. Disclosed whether or not relationship with industry exists

42. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

43. Laura MacIsaac, MD, MPH, FACOG

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

44. Disclsoed whether or not relationship with industry exists

45. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

46. Anthony T. DiBenedetto, MD, FACS

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

47. Disclsoed whether or not relationship with industry exists

48. Would you like to hear this speaker again

49. Andrew M. Kaunitz, MD, FACOG

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

50. Disclosed whether or not relationship with industry exists

51. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

52. Kunle Odunsi, MD, PhD

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

53. Disclosed whether or not relationship with industry exists

54. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

55. Haywood L. Brown, MD, FACOG

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

56. Disclsoed whether or not relationship with industry exists

57. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

58. Yitzchak M. Binik, PhD

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

59. Disclosed whether or not relationship with industry exists

60. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

61. Linda Bradley, MD, FACOG

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

62. Disclosed whether or not relationship with industry exists

63. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

64. Nicholas Kulbida, MD, FACOG

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

65. Disclosed whether or not relationship with industry exists

66. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

67. Joanne Stone, MD, FACOG

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

68. Disclosed whether or not relationship with industry exists

69. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

70. James Goldberg, MD, FACOG

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

71. Disclosed whether or not relationship with industry exists

72. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

73. Cynthia Gymafi-Bannerman, MD, FACOG

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

74. Disclosed whether or not relationship with industry exists

75. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

76. Angela Bianco, MD, FACOG

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

77. Disclosed whether or not relationship wtih industry exists

78. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

79. Richard L. Berkowitz, MD, FACOG

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

80. Disclosed whether ot not relationship with industry exists

81. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

82. Elliott K. Main, MD, FACOG

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

83. Disclosed whether or not relationship with faculty exists

84. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

85. "Ask the Experts" Panel Discussion

  1 (poor) 2 3 4 5 (excellent)
Was understandable (speed, diction, volume)
Kept within time limits
Made no inappropriate remarks
Appeared not to have a commercial bias

86. Disclosed whether or not relationship with industry exists

87. Would you like to hear this speaker again?

88. This program was:

89. The entire program...

  1 (strongly disagree) 2 3 4 5 (strongly agree)
Was well-organized
Was consistent with course objectives
Allowed sufficient time for discussion
Adhered to printed meeting schedule
Meeting facilities were conducive to learning

90. Final program grade (5 = best score)

91. The hotel facilities

  1 (very dissatisfied) 2 3 4 5 (very satisfied)
How satisfied were you with this facility?
How satisfied were you with the cost of this facility?

92. Preferred topics for future courses (indicate if of interest to you):