Cognitive biases in pain: current challenges, future directions and treatment opportunities (Friday, May 25, 2018)

Friday, May 25, 2018 | 11:00 am - 12:30 pm

Please complete this evaluation which will be used to finalize the accreditation process. Kindly take 2-3 minutes to complete all of the below questions.

Question Title

* 1. Please indicate your answer for each question below

	Strongly Agree (5)	Agree (4)	Neutral (3)	Disagree (2)	Strongly Disagree(1)
This session was appropriate and will help me modify my practice	This session was appropriate and will help me modify my practice Strongly Agree (5)	This session was appropriate and will help me modify my practice Agree (4)	This session was appropriate and will help me modify my practice Neutral (3)	This session was appropriate and will help me modify my practice Disagree (2)	This session was appropriate and will help me modify my practice Strongly Disagree(1)
This session met my needs	This session met my needs Strongly Agree (5)	This session met my needs Agree (4)	This session met my needs Neutral (3)	This session met my needs Disagree (2)	This session met my needs Strongly Disagree(1)

Comments

Question Title

* 2. Did you perceive any degree of bias in any part of the presentation?

Yes

No

Question Title

* 3. Did the activity respect the Quebec Code of Ethics (CQDPCM)?

Yes

No

Question Title

* 4. The session fulfilled the learning objectives defined below (See question 5)

Yes

No

Not Sure

Question Title

* 5. At the conclusion of this activity I will be able to:

	Yes	No
Understand the current state-of-the-science on attention bias for pain and address the malleability and dynamic nature of attention bias for pain. Provide an insight in factors influencing attention bias for pain.	Understand the current state-of-the-science on attention bias for pain and address the malleability and dynamic nature of attention bias for pain. Provide an insight in factors influencing attention bias for pain. Yes	Understand the current state-of-the-science on attention bias for pain and address the malleability and dynamic nature of attention bias for pain. Provide an insight in factors influencing attention bias for pain. No
To understand the role of cognitive biases in children's acute and chronic pain experiences and the efficacy of a novel, parent-led memory reframing intervention for children's post-surgical pain.	To understand the role of cognitive biases in children's acute and chronic pain experiences and the efficacy of a novel, parent-led memory reframing intervention for children's post-surgical pain. Yes	To understand the role of cognitive biases in children's acute and chronic pain experiences and the efficacy of a novel, parent-led memory reframing intervention for children's post-surgical pain. No
To get an understanding of the available evidence for the use of attention bias modification to reduce pain experience and disability, and its applicability in chronic pain patients.	To get an understanding of the available evidence for the use of attention bias modification to reduce pain experience and disability, and its applicability in chronic pain patients. Yes	To get an understanding of the available evidence for the use of attention bias modification to reduce pain experience and disability, and its applicability in chronic pain patients. No

Question Title

* 6. Speaker 1 Evaluation: Dimitri ML Van Ryckeghem

	Strongly Agree (5)	Agree(4)	Neutral (3)	Disagree(2)	Strongly Disagree(1)
The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Strongly Agree (5)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Agree(4)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Neutral (3)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Disagree(2)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Strongly Disagree(1)
This program content has enhanced my knowledge	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Strongly Agree (5)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Agree(4)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Neutral (3)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Disagree(2)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Strongly Disagree(1)
The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Strongly Agree (5)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Agree(4)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Neutral (3)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Disagree(2)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Strongly Disagree(1)

Comments

Question Title

* 7. Did the presenter (Speaker 1) make a disclosure statement? (Verbal and with slide)

Yes

No

Not Sure

Question Title

* 8. Speaker 2 Evaluation: Melanie Noel

	Strongly Agree (5)	Agree(4)	Neutral (3)	Disagree(2)	Strongly Disagree(1)
The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Strongly Agree (5)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Agree(4)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Neutral (3)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Disagree(2)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Strongly Disagree(1)
This program content has enhanced my knowledge	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Strongly Agree (5)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Agree(4)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Neutral (3)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Disagree(2)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Strongly Disagree(1)
The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Strongly Agree (5)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Agree(4)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Neutral (3)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Disagree(2)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Strongly Disagree(1)

Comments

Question Title

* 9. Did the presenter (Speaker 2) make a disclosure statement? (Verbal and with slide)

Yes

No

Not Sure

Question Title

* 10. Speaker 3 Evaluation: Gordon JG Asmundson

	Strongly Agree (5)	Agree(4)	Neutral (3)	Disagree(2)	Strongly Disagree(1)
The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Strongly Agree (5)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Agree(4)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Neutral (3)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Disagree(2)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Strongly Disagree(1)
This program content has enhanced my knowledge	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Strongly Agree (5)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Agree(4)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Neutral (3)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Disagree(2)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Strongly Disagree(1)
The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Strongly Agree (5)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Agree(4)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Neutral (3)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Disagree(2)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Strongly Disagree(1)

Comments

Question Title

* 11. Did the presenter (Speaker 3) make a disclosure statement? (Verbal and with slide)

Yes

No

Not Sure