Skip to content

CanSAGE ECEP - Endometriosis Digital Toolkit Review

Link to the Endometriosis Digital Toolkit:
https://cansage.org/ecep/ecep-digital-tool-kit/
Objective: To gather feedback on the usefulness, clarity and overall experience of the toolkit and identify opportunities to refine and strengthen the resource.

Audience: Primary care and Emergency medicine providers/residents in Canada, including, Family Physicians, Emergency Medicine Physicians, Residents, Nurse Practitioners, and Physician Assistants.

Gift Card Contest: As a token of our appreciation for your time and valuable insights, the first 20 respondents will win a $20 visa gift card. Please provide your name and email so that we may contact you. Good luck and thank you!

Privacy Notification: Your survey responses and personal information is collected under the authority of section 26(c) of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FIPPA). This information will be used for evaluation and quality improvement initiatives. Questions about the collection of this information may be directed to Sonia Hoole at catherine.collier@cansage.org. If you agree to these terms, please continue with the post-course assessment.
1.Full Name
2.Email
3.What is your professional role?(Required.)
4.What is the primary language used in your practice?(Required.)
5.Overall, how useful did you find this toolkit for primary care practice?(Required.)
6.Which sections were most useful for your practice? (Select up to 2)(Required.)
7.After reviewing this toolkit, how would you rate your knowledge of recognizing possible endometriosis?(Required.)
8.How much does this toolkit increase your confidence in making a presumptive clinical diagnosis and initiating management based on clinical suspicion alone, rather than waiting for surgical confirmation?(Required.)
9.In a time-constrained environment, were you able to navigate to the "Action Plan" or "Emergency Pivot" and find the information you needed in under 60 seconds?(Required.)
10.Did the interactive "check-as-you-go" functionality (circles and squares) help you feel more thorough and consistent in your clinical assessment of core symptoms?(Required.)
11.How relevant and helpful was the tailored, role-specific guidance provided for your clinical setting (i.e., PCP longitudinal management versus EMP emergency room pivot)?(Required.)
12.How would you rate the overall usability, visual layout, and ease of navigation of the interactive checklists provided throughout the document?(Required.)
13.How helpful was the overarching guidance on integrating trauma-informed protocols to establish patient safety, consent, and autonomy prior to and during physical examinations?(Required.)
14.How clearly does the resource differentiate between when to order a basic ultrasound versus an advanced ultrasound or MRI to map the disease?(Required.)
15.To what extent has the resource improved your ability to confidently triage patients, prevent fragmented care, and coordinate timely referrals to specialized multidisciplinary support?(Required.)
16.Based on your experience with this resource, how interested are you in utilizing the linked advanced continuing education programs (such as the CanSAGE ECEP) to further refine your diagnostic, imaging, or surgical management skills?(Required.)
17.Do you anticipate using this toolkit in your clinical practice?(Required.)
18.What is one improvement that would make this toolkit more useful?(Required.)
19.Would you recommend this toolkit to colleagues?(Required.)