Thursday May 24, 2018 | 11:00 am - 12:30 pm

Please complete this evaluation which will be used to finalize the accreditation process. Kindly take 2-3 minutes to complete all of the below questions. 

Question Title

* 1. Please indicate your answer for each question below

  Strongly Agree (5) Agree (4) Neutral (3) Disagree (2) Strongly Disagree(1)
This session was appropriate and will help me modify my practice 
This session met my needs

Question Title

* 2. Did you perceive any degree of bias in any part of the presentation?

Question Title

* 3. Did the activity respect the Quebec Code of Ethics (CQDPCM)?

Question Title

* 4. The session fulfilled the learning objectives defined below (See question 5)

Question Title

* 5. At the conclusion of this activity I will be able to:

  Yes No
After this symposium; participants will be able to describe contributory causes to the opioid crisis, and why this crisis is hard to reverse.
After this symposium; participants will be able to describe new quality standards that may improve the safety and effectiveness of opioid prescribing for pain.
After this symposium; participants will be able to describe national and provincial initiatives currently underway to tackle the “opioid crisis” while maintaining the interests of people living with chronic pain.

Question Title

* 6. Speaker 1 Evaluation: Jane C Ballantyne

  Strongly Agree (5) Agree(4) Neutral (3) Disagree(2) Strongly Disagree(1)
The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject
This program content has enhanced my knowledge
The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking

Question Title

* 7. Did the presenter (Speaker 1) make a disclosure statement? (Verbal and with slide)

Question Title

* 8. Speaker 2 Evaluation: Jason Busse

  Strongly Agree (5) Agree(4) Neutral (3) Disagree(2) Strongly Disagree(1)
The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject
This program content has enhanced my knowledge
The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking

Question Title

* 9. Did the presenter (Speaker 2) make a disclosure statement? (Verbal and with slide)

Question Title

* 10. Speaker 3 Evaluation: Hance Clarke

  Strongly Agree (5) Agree(4) Neutral (3) Disagree(2) Strongly Disagree(1)
The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject
This program content has enhanced my knowledge
The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking

Question Title

* 11. Did the presenter (Speaker 3) make a disclosure statement? (Verbal and with slide)

T