MARS is user-friendly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I like the look and feel of MARS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MARS has reduced the amount of effort required to build a submission.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automated checks in MARS have assisted me to address issues/anomalies prior to lodgement and improve the quality of my submission.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validation messages generated during submission preparation are clear and helpful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MARS has allowed other people in my organisation to access information on submissions, approvals and progress reports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mapping integration in MARS makes it easier to understand what my organisation is claiming in a submission.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using MARS for an in-field assessment has led to a quicker approval than previous in-field assessments I have experienced.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I use MARS to help inform other people in my organisation about the status of DRFA activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managing disaster funding submissions under DRFA and using MARS is easier than the previous process.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MARS has assisted me to improve the quality of my submissions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|