SurveyMonkey Powered Online Survey

December 14, 2021

Speaker: Dr Josh Bennitz, UBC Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Neuromonitoring Pharm, Phys, and ArtiPhacts
Learning Objectives:
After participating in this talk, participants will be able to:
1. Review the pharmacology and physiology of intraoperative neuromonitoring
2. Explore common issues and artifacts with IONM
3. Discuss the management of abnormal IONM

Speaker: Dr Bryan Adam Glezerson, McGill University
Technical considerations for neurophysiology in the operating theatre
Learning Objectives:
After participating in this talk, participants will be able to:
1. Discuss the principles underlying differential amplification.
2. Describe and recognize common artifacts that affect neurophysiological data acquisition in the OR.
3. Acknowledge the diagnostic limitations of intraoperative EEG monitoring, on technical grounds.

Question Title

* 1. Overall evaluation

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Somewhat Agree	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
The activity met the stated learning objectives	The activity met the stated learning objectives Strongly Agree	The activity met the stated learning objectives Agree	The activity met the stated learning objectives Somewhat Agree	The activity met the stated learning objectives Disagree	The activity met the stated learning objectives Strongly Disagree
The activity enhanced my knowledge	The activity enhanced my knowledge Strongly Agree	The activity enhanced my knowledge Agree	The activity enhanced my knowledge Somewhat Agree	The activity enhanced my knowledge Disagree	The activity enhanced my knowledge Strongly Disagree
The activity satisfied my expectations	The activity satisfied my expectations Strongly Agree	The activity satisfied my expectations Agree	The activity satisfied my expectations Somewhat Agree	The activity satisfied my expectations Disagree	The activity satisfied my expectations Strongly Disagree
The chosen topic and content were relevant to my learning needs	The chosen topic and content were relevant to my learning needs Strongly Agree	The chosen topic and content were relevant to my learning needs Agree	The chosen topic and content were relevant to my learning needs Somewhat Agree	The chosen topic and content were relevant to my learning needs Disagree	The chosen topic and content were relevant to my learning needs Strongly Disagree
The session was easy to access	The session was easy to access Strongly Agree	The session was easy to access Agree	The session was easy to access Somewhat Agree	The session was easy to access Disagree	The session was easy to access Strongly Disagree
The quality of the transmission was good	The quality of the transmission was good Strongly Agree	The quality of the transmission was good Agree	The quality of the transmission was good Somewhat Agree	The quality of the transmission was good Disagree	The quality of the transmission was good Strongly Disagree
25% of the session involved active participation, e.g. Q&A, discussion	25% of the session involved active participation, e.g. Q&A, discussion Strongly Agree	25% of the session involved active participation, e.g. Q&A, discussion Agree	25% of the session involved active participation, e.g. Q&A, discussion Somewhat Agree	25% of the session involved active participation, e.g. Q&A, discussion Disagree	25% of the session involved active participation, e.g. Q&A, discussion Strongly Disagree
I enjoyed learning in this format	I enjoyed learning in this format Strongly Agree	I enjoyed learning in this format Agree	I enjoyed learning in this format Somewhat Agree	I enjoyed learning in this format Disagree	I enjoyed learning in this format Strongly Disagree

Question Title

* 2. What did you learn or how will this event impact your practice?

Question Title

* 3. Please indicate which CanMEDS roles were addressed during this educational activity

Medical Expert

Communicator

Collaborator

Leader

Health advocate

Scholar

Professional

Question Title

* 4. Presenters

	communicated clearly and effectively	was knowledgeable about this topic	provided sufficient time for discussion	used effective teaching methods
Dr Josh Bennitz	Dr Josh Bennitz communicated clearly and effectively	Dr Josh Bennitz was knowledgeable about this topic	Dr Josh Bennitz provided sufficient time for discussion	Dr Josh Bennitz used effective teaching methods
Dr Bryan Glezerson	Dr Bryan Glezerson communicated clearly and effectively	Dr Bryan Glezerson was knowledgeable about this topic	Dr Bryan Glezerson provided sufficient time for discussion	Dr Bryan Glezerson used effective teaching methods

Additional Comments:

Question Title

* 5. The activity and presenters were balanced and free from commercial bias

Yes

No (please indicate why)

Question Title

* 6. Other comments on the activity:

Question Title

* 7. Suggestions for future activities:

Thank you for completing the evaluation!

To download your certificate of attendance, please go to the CAS website at www.cas.ca/neuro-events.