1. Default Section

* 1. Programming Experience

* 2. Frameworks Experience

* 3. About Java I feel:

* 4. I've heard that the onTap framework is:

* 5. I use frameworks regularly and in choosing framework(s) for an application, these features are:

  Undesirable Neutral / Don't Know Nice to have Important Required
Printed Books
XML configuration files
Community Wiki
Easy to Learn / Use
Aspect Oriented Programming (AOP)
Object Oriented Architecture (OO)
Extensibility (plugins / filters)
SES URLs
Video Tutorials
AJAX Integration
Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
Full Stack (automates common tasks)
Commercial Support Contracts
Dependency Injection (IoC / DI)
Object Caching Services (RAM)
Thorough Documentation
User Management / Security Features
Scaffolding Tools for CRUD Tasks
Object-Relational Mapping (ORM)
Scalability
Convention over Configuration (CoC)

* 6. I've seen the installation videos for the onTap framework.

* 7. I heard about the onTap framework through:

* 8. What versions of the onTap framework have you tried?

* 9. I tried an *older* version of the framework and found it to be (skip this question if you have not used the framework or if you have only used 3.2):

  Don't know Poor Acceptable Good Excellent!
Community Involvement
Stability
Support for OO Techniques
Thorough Documentation
Extensibility (plugins)
Support for Procedural Techniques
Gentle Learning Curve
Scalability
Technical Support

* 10. I've tried onTap framework 3.2 recently and find it to be (skip this question if you have not tried the most recent version):

  Don't Know Poor Acceptable Good Excellent!
Scalability
Extensibility (plugins)
Community Involvement
Thorough Documentation
Stability
Support for Procedural Techniques
Technical Support
Support for OO Techniques
Gentle Learning Curve

T