Multi-Disciplinary Experimental-Centric Pedagogy (ECP) Workshop Reflections. June 16 & 17, 2021: Morgan State University

As part of effort to evaluate the Adapting an Experimental-centric Teaching Approach to Increase Student Achievement in Multiple STEM Disciplines (ETA-STEM) Workshop, Gullie Consultant Services, LLC is conducting a post-reflection that documents your objectives and expectations of the outcomes of the workshop. This information may be used to provide formative feedback to project staff, to document grant activities for the funder, and to aid in dissemination and knowledge development activities. Please read each of the following questions and provide the answer that reflects your status or opinion. Your participation is voluntary; your responses are strictly confidential and will not be released in any way that allows an individual to be identified. Only aggregate data will be presented in any reports. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact K Gullie PhD or D. Spaulding PhD at Gullie Consultant Services; gullieconsultants@gmail.com or the grant coordinator, Dr. Oludare Owolabi, PE, MCHIT, REG Engr, CO at Oludare.Owolabi@morgan.edu. Thank you for your participation

Question Title

* 1. What is your gender?

Female

Male

Other

Question Title

* 2. Current Position:

Instructor

Assistant Professor

Associate Professor

Professor

GA/TA/RA

Student

Administrator

Other

Question Title

* 3. Age Group

24 or under

25-29

30-34

35-39

40-49

50+

Question Title

* 4. Your Workshop Experience
The following statements pertain to your overall perceptions of the workshop. Please indicate your level of agreement with each statement by circling the number that best represents your perceptions about the statement. Use the following scale:

1=Strongly Disagree 2=Disagree 3=Slightly Disagree 4=Slightly Agree 5=Agree 6=Strongly Agree

The Workshop Content

	1 (SD)	2	3	4	5	6 (SA)
The content was of interest to me.	The content was of interest to me. 1 (SD)	The content was of interest to me. 2	The content was of interest to me. 3	The content was of interest to me. 4	The content was of interest to me. 5	The content was of interest to me. 6 (SA)
The content presented was useful and relevant for my work.	The content presented was useful and relevant for my work. 1 (SD)	The content presented was useful and relevant for my work. 2	The content presented was useful and relevant for my work. 3	The content presented was useful and relevant for my work. 4	The content presented was useful and relevant for my work. 5	The content presented was useful and relevant for my work. 6 (SA)
The information presented was easy to understand.	The information presented was easy to understand. 1 (SD)	The information presented was easy to understand. 2	The information presented was easy to understand. 3	The information presented was easy to understand. 4	The information presented was easy to understand. 5	The information presented was easy to understand. 6 (SA)
The content can be easily adapted to my students.	The content can be easily adapted to my students. 1 (SD)	The content can be easily adapted to my students. 2	The content can be easily adapted to my students. 3	The content can be easily adapted to my students. 4	The content can be easily adapted to my students. 5	The content can be easily adapted to my students. 6 (SA)
The information enhanced my skills in the topic area.	The information enhanced my skills in the topic area. 1 (SD)	The information enhanced my skills in the topic area. 2	The information enhanced my skills in the topic area. 3	The information enhanced my skills in the topic area. 4	The information enhanced my skills in the topic area. 5	The information enhanced my skills in the topic area. 6 (SA)

Question Title

* 5. Satisfaction and Use Level
The following statements pertain to your overall perceptions of the workshop. Please indicate your level of agreement with each statement by circling the number that best represents your perceptions about the statement. Use the following scale:

1=Strongly Disagree 2=Disagree 3=Slightly Disagree 4=Slightly Agree 5=Agree 6=Strongly Agree

	1 (SD)	2	3	4	5	6 (SA)
I am satisfied with the quality of this workshop.	I am satisfied with the quality of this workshop. 1 (SD)	I am satisfied with the quality of this workshop. 2	I am satisfied with the quality of this workshop. 3	I am satisfied with the quality of this workshop. 4	I am satisfied with the quality of this workshop. 5	I am satisfied with the quality of this workshop. 6 (SA)
I expect to use the information gained from this session.	I expect to use the information gained from this session. 1 (SD)	I expect to use the information gained from this session. 2	I expect to use the information gained from this session. 3	I expect to use the information gained from this session. 4	I expect to use the information gained from this session. 5	I expect to use the information gained from this session. 6 (SA)
I expect this information to benefit my students.	I expect this information to benefit my students. 1 (SD)	I expect this information to benefit my students. 2	I expect this information to benefit my students. 3	I expect this information to benefit my students. 4	I expect this information to benefit my students. 5	I expect this information to benefit my students. 6 (SA)
I would recommend this workshop to a colleague.	I would recommend this workshop to a colleague. 1 (SD)	I would recommend this workshop to a colleague. 2	I would recommend this workshop to a colleague. 3	I would recommend this workshop to a colleague. 4	I would recommend this workshop to a colleague. 5	I would recommend this workshop to a colleague. 6 (SA)

Question Title

* 6. The Presenters
The following statements pertain to your overall perceptions of the workshop. Please indicate your level of agreement with each statement by circling the number that best represents your perceptions about the statement. Use the following scale:

1=Strongly Disagree 2=Disagree 3=Slightly Disagree 4=Slightly Agree 5=Agree 6=Strongly Agree

	1 (SD)	2	3	4	5	6 (SA)
The presenters were well prepared for the session.	The presenters were well prepared for the session. 1 (SD)	The presenters were well prepared for the session. 2	The presenters were well prepared for the session. 3	The presenters were well prepared for the session. 4	The presenters were well prepared for the session. 5	The presenters were well prepared for the session. 6 (SA)
The presenters were knowledgeable.	The presenters were knowledgeable. 1 (SD)	The presenters were knowledgeable. 2	The presenters were knowledgeable. 3	The presenters were knowledgeable. 4	The presenters were knowledgeable. 5	The presenters were knowledgeable. 6 (SA)
The presenters were receptive to participant comments and questions.	The presenters were receptive to participant comments and questions. 1 (SD)	The presenters were receptive to participant comments and questions. 2	The presenters were receptive to participant comments and questions. 3	The presenters were receptive to participant comments and questions. 4	The presenters were receptive to participant comments and questions. 5	The presenters were receptive to participant comments and questions. 6 (SA)

Question Title

* 7. The Experimental Centric Approach to Learning
The following statements pertain to your overall perceptions of the workshop. Please indicate your level of agreement with each statement by circling the number that best represents your perceptions about the statement. Use the following scale:

1=Strongly Disagree 2=Disagree 3=Slightly Disagree 4=Slightly Agree 5=Agree 6=Strongly Agree

	1 (SD)	2	3	4	5	6 (SA)
This approach is of interest to me.	This approach is of interest to me. 1 (SD)	This approach is of interest to me. 2	This approach is of interest to me. 3	This approach is of interest to me. 4	This approach is of interest to me. 5	This approach is of interest to me. 6 (SA)
The content presented on this approach was useful and relevant to my teaching.	The content presented on this approach was useful and relevant to my teaching. 1 (SD)	The content presented on this approach was useful and relevant to my teaching. 2	The content presented on this approach was useful and relevant to my teaching. 3	The content presented on this approach was useful and relevant to my teaching. 4	The content presented on this approach was useful and relevant to my teaching. 5	The content presented on this approach was useful and relevant to my teaching. 6 (SA)
My understanding of technology-supported experimental engineering education has increased.	My understanding of technology-supported experimental engineering education has increased. 1 (SD)	My understanding of technology-supported experimental engineering education has increased. 2	My understanding of technology-supported experimental engineering education has increased. 3	My understanding of technology-supported experimental engineering education has increased. 4	My understanding of technology-supported experimental engineering education has increased. 5	My understanding of technology-supported experimental engineering education has increased. 6 (SA)
The method can be easily adapted to my classes.	The method can be easily adapted to my classes. 1 (SD)	The method can be easily adapted to my classes. 2	The method can be easily adapted to my classes. 3	The method can be easily adapted to my classes. 4	The method can be easily adapted to my classes. 5	The method can be easily adapted to my classes. 6 (SA)
I would like more examples and practice on using this approach.	I would like more examples and practice on using this approach. 1 (SD)	I would like more examples and practice on using this approach. 2	I would like more examples and practice on using this approach. 3	I would like more examples and practice on using this approach. 4	I would like more examples and practice on using this approach. 5	I would like more examples and practice on using this approach. 6 (SA)
I will encourage others in my department to use this approach.	I will encourage others in my department to use this approach. 1 (SD)	I will encourage others in my department to use this approach. 2	I will encourage others in my department to use this approach. 3	I will encourage others in my department to use this approach. 4	I will encourage others in my department to use this approach. 5	I will encourage others in my department to use this approach. 6 (SA)

Question Title

* 8. Use of the ECP Tools
The following statements pertain to your overall perceptions of the workshop. Please indicate your level of agreement with each statement by circling the number that best represents your perceptions about the statement. Use the following scale:

1=Strongly Disagree 2=Disagree 3=Slightly Disagree 4=Slightly Agree 5=Agree 6=Strongly Agree

	1 (SD)	2	3	4	5	6 (SA)
Use of this tool as a teaching aid was of interest to me.	Use of this tool as a teaching aid was of interest to me. 1 (SD)	Use of this tool as a teaching aid was of interest to me. 2	Use of this tool as a teaching aid was of interest to me. 3	Use of this tool as a teaching aid was of interest to me. 4	Use of this tool as a teaching aid was of interest to me. 5	Use of this tool as a teaching aid was of interest to me. 6 (SA)
The content presented on this tool was useful and relevant to my teaching.	The content presented on this tool was useful and relevant to my teaching. 1 (SD)	The content presented on this tool was useful and relevant to my teaching. 2	The content presented on this tool was useful and relevant to my teaching. 3	The content presented on this tool was useful and relevant to my teaching. 4	The content presented on this tool was useful and relevant to my teaching. 5	The content presented on this tool was useful and relevant to my teaching. 6 (SA)
My understanding of technology-supported STEM education has increased because of the ECP devices/tools.	My understanding of technology-supported STEM education has increased because of the ECP devices/tools. 1 (SD)	My understanding of technology-supported STEM education has increased because of the ECP devices/tools. 2	My understanding of technology-supported STEM education has increased because of the ECP devices/tools. 3	My understanding of technology-supported STEM education has increased because of the ECP devices/tools. 4	My understanding of technology-supported STEM education has increased because of the ECP devices/tools. 5	My understanding of technology-supported STEM education has increased because of the ECP devices/tools. 6 (SA)
The tools presented are easily adapted to my classes.	The tools presented are easily adapted to my classes. 1 (SD)	The tools presented are easily adapted to my classes. 2	The tools presented are easily adapted to my classes. 3	The tools presented are easily adapted to my classes. 4	The tools presented are easily adapted to my classes. 5	The tools presented are easily adapted to my classes. 6 (SA)
I would like more examples and practice on using the tools in my courses.	I would like more examples and practice on using the tools in my courses. 1 (SD)	I would like more examples and practice on using the tools in my courses. 2	I would like more examples and practice on using the tools in my courses. 3	I would like more examples and practice on using the tools in my courses. 4	I would like more examples and practice on using the tools in my courses. 5	I would like more examples and practice on using the tools in my courses. 6 (SA)
I will encourage others in my department to use these tools.	I will encourage others in my department to use these tools. 1 (SD)	I will encourage others in my department to use these tools. 2	I will encourage others in my department to use these tools. 3	I will encourage others in my department to use these tools. 4	I will encourage others in my department to use these tools. 5	I will encourage others in my department to use these tools. 6 (SA)

Question Title

* 9. The Workshop/Meetings
The following statements pertain to your overall perceptions of the workshop. Please indicate your level of agreement with each statement by circling the number that best represents your perceptions about the statement. Use the following scale:

1=Strongly Disagree 2=Disagree 3=Slightly Disagree 4=Slightly Agree 5=Agree 6=Strongly Agree

	1 (SD)	2	3	4	5	6 (SA)
The workshop’s Format was comfortable and conducive to learning.	The workshop’s Format was comfortable and conducive to learning. 1 (SD)	The workshop’s Format was comfortable and conducive to learning. 2	The workshop’s Format was comfortable and conducive to learning. 3	The workshop’s Format was comfortable and conducive to learning. 4	The workshop’s Format was comfortable and conducive to learning. 5	The workshop’s Format was comfortable and conducive to learning. 6 (SA)
The workshop’s Format encouraged discussion of teaching methods and engineering education needs.	The workshop’s Format encouraged discussion of teaching methods and engineering education needs. 1 (SD)	The workshop’s Format encouraged discussion of teaching methods and engineering education needs. 2	The workshop’s Format encouraged discussion of teaching methods and engineering education needs. 3	The workshop’s Format encouraged discussion of teaching methods and engineering education needs. 4	The workshop’s Format encouraged discussion of teaching methods and engineering education needs. 5	The workshop’s Format encouraged discussion of teaching methods and engineering education needs. 6 (SA)
The workshop was a good use of grant time and funds.	The workshop was a good use of grant time and funds. 1 (SD)	The workshop was a good use of grant time and funds. 2	The workshop was a good use of grant time and funds. 3	The workshop was a good use of grant time and funds. 4	The workshop was a good use of grant time and funds. 5	The workshop was a good use of grant time and funds. 6 (SA)
The workshop’s Format provided appropriate opportunities for participants to interact and collaborate.	The workshop’s Format provided appropriate opportunities for participants to interact and collaborate. 1 (SD)	The workshop’s Format provided appropriate opportunities for participants to interact and collaborate. 2	The workshop’s Format provided appropriate opportunities for participants to interact and collaborate. 3	The workshop’s Format provided appropriate opportunities for participants to interact and collaborate. 4	The workshop’s Format provided appropriate opportunities for participants to interact and collaborate. 5	The workshop’s Format provided appropriate opportunities for participants to interact and collaborate. 6 (SA)
I would like to have more meetings on these topics, if funding is provided.	I would like to have more meetings on these topics, if funding is provided. 1 (SD)	I would like to have more meetings on these topics, if funding is provided. 2	I would like to have more meetings on these topics, if funding is provided. 3	I would like to have more meetings on these topics, if funding is provided. 4	I would like to have more meetings on these topics, if funding is provided. 5	I would like to have more meetings on these topics, if funding is provided. 6 (SA)
I would encourage my colleagues to attend these meetings, if funding were provided.	I would encourage my colleagues to attend these meetings, if funding were provided. 1 (SD)	I would encourage my colleagues to attend these meetings, if funding were provided. 2	I would encourage my colleagues to attend these meetings, if funding were provided. 3	I would encourage my colleagues to attend these meetings, if funding were provided. 4	I would encourage my colleagues to attend these meetings, if funding were provided. 5	I would encourage my colleagues to attend these meetings, if funding were provided. 6 (SA)
The Format supported my personal needs (e.g. accessibility, learning environment, etc.)	The Format supported my personal needs (e.g. accessibility, learning environment, etc.) 1 (SD)	The Format supported my personal needs (e.g. accessibility, learning environment, etc.) 2	The Format supported my personal needs (e.g. accessibility, learning environment, etc.) 3	The Format supported my personal needs (e.g. accessibility, learning environment, etc.) 4	The Format supported my personal needs (e.g. accessibility, learning environment, etc.) 5	The Format supported my personal needs (e.g. accessibility, learning environment, etc.) 6 (SA)

Question Title

* 10. The Materials
The following statements pertain to your overall perceptions of the workshop. Please indicate your level of agreement with each statement by circling the number that best represents your perceptions about the statement. Use the following scale:

1=Strongly Disagree 2=Disagree 3=Slightly Disagree 4=Slightly Agree 5=Agree 6=Strongly Agree

	1 (SD)	2	3	4	5	6 (SA)
The materials presented at the workshop were helpful.	The materials presented at the workshop were helpful. 1 (SD)	The materials presented at the workshop were helpful. 2	The materials presented at the workshop were helpful. 3	The materials presented at the workshop were helpful. 4	The materials presented at the workshop were helpful. 5	The materials presented at the workshop were helpful. 6 (SA)
I would like more material on ECP devices/tools.	I would like more material on ECP devices/tools. 1 (SD)	I would like more material on ECP devices/tools. 2	I would like more material on ECP devices/tools. 3	I would like more material on ECP devices/tools. 4	I would like more material on ECP devices/tools. 5	I would like more material on ECP devices/tools. 6 (SA)
I would like more material on experimental centric teaching.	I would like more material on experimental centric teaching. 1 (SD)	I would like more material on experimental centric teaching. 2	I would like more material on experimental centric teaching. 3	I would like more material on experimental centric teaching. 4	I would like more material on experimental centric teaching. 5	I would like more material on experimental centric teaching. 6 (SA)

Question Title

* 11. Outcomes of Participation

The following statements reflect possible outcomes that may have resulted from your participation in this grant workshop. Please indicate how useful you believe the meeting will be in helping you achieve each outcome by circling the number that best reflects the meeting’s impact. Use the following scale:

1=Strongly Disagree 2=Disagree 3=Slightly Disagree 4=Slightly Agree 5=Agree 6=Strongly Agree

	1 (SD)	2	3	4	5	6 (SA)
Outcomes of workshop included an increase in my proficiency and understanding in the use of technology-supported experimental STEM education.	Outcomes of workshop included an increase in my proficiency and understanding in the use of technology-supported experimental STEM education. 1 (SD)	Outcomes of workshop included an increase in my proficiency and understanding in the use of technology-supported experimental STEM education. 2	Outcomes of workshop included an increase in my proficiency and understanding in the use of technology-supported experimental STEM education. 3	Outcomes of workshop included an increase in my proficiency and understanding in the use of technology-supported experimental STEM education. 4	Outcomes of workshop included an increase in my proficiency and understanding in the use of technology-supported experimental STEM education. 5	Outcomes of workshop included an increase in my proficiency and understanding in the use of technology-supported experimental STEM education. 6 (SA)
Outcomes of workshop included an increase in my proficiency and understanding in the process of designing and implementing curricula.	Outcomes of workshop included an increase in my proficiency and understanding in the process of designing and implementing curricula. 1 (SD)	Outcomes of workshop included an increase in my proficiency and understanding in the process of designing and implementing curricula. 2	Outcomes of workshop included an increase in my proficiency and understanding in the process of designing and implementing curricula. 3	Outcomes of workshop included an increase in my proficiency and understanding in the process of designing and implementing curricula. 4	Outcomes of workshop included an increase in my proficiency and understanding in the process of designing and implementing curricula. 5	Outcomes of workshop included an increase in my proficiency and understanding in the process of designing and implementing curricula. 6 (SA)
Outcomes of workshop included an increase in my proficiency and understanding of the use of the ECP devices/tools.	Outcomes of workshop included an increase in my proficiency and understanding of the use of the ECP devices/tools. 1 (SD)	Outcomes of workshop included an increase in my proficiency and understanding of the use of the ECP devices/tools. 2	Outcomes of workshop included an increase in my proficiency and understanding of the use of the ECP devices/tools. 3	Outcomes of workshop included an increase in my proficiency and understanding of the use of the ECP devices/tools. 4	Outcomes of workshop included an increase in my proficiency and understanding of the use of the ECP devices/tools. 5	Outcomes of workshop included an increase in my proficiency and understanding of the use of the ECP devices/tools. 6 (SA)
Outcomes of workshop included exposure to new curriculum resources that I can integrate into my classes.	Outcomes of workshop included exposure to new curriculum resources that I can integrate into my classes. 1 (SD)	Outcomes of workshop included exposure to new curriculum resources that I can integrate into my classes. 2	Outcomes of workshop included exposure to new curriculum resources that I can integrate into my classes. 3	Outcomes of workshop included exposure to new curriculum resources that I can integrate into my classes. 4	Outcomes of workshop included exposure to new curriculum resources that I can integrate into my classes. 5	Outcomes of workshop included exposure to new curriculum resources that I can integrate into my classes. 6 (SA)
Outcomes of workshop included the development of my ability to the ECP devices/tools in multiple settings and content areas.	Outcomes of workshop included the development of my ability to the ECP devices/tools in multiple settings and content areas. 1 (SD)	Outcomes of workshop included the development of my ability to the ECP devices/tools in multiple settings and content areas. 2	Outcomes of workshop included the development of my ability to the ECP devices/tools in multiple settings and content areas. 3	Outcomes of workshop included the development of my ability to the ECP devices/tools in multiple settings and content areas. 4	Outcomes of workshop included the development of my ability to the ECP devices/tools in multiple settings and content areas. 5	Outcomes of workshop included the development of my ability to the ECP devices/tools in multiple settings and content areas. 6 (SA)
Outcomes of workshop included the development of my ability to teach new means of solving engineering problems through the use of technology.	Outcomes of workshop included the development of my ability to teach new means of solving engineering problems through the use of technology. 1 (SD)	Outcomes of workshop included the development of my ability to teach new means of solving engineering problems through the use of technology. 2	Outcomes of workshop included the development of my ability to teach new means of solving engineering problems through the use of technology. 3	Outcomes of workshop included the development of my ability to teach new means of solving engineering problems through the use of technology. 4	Outcomes of workshop included the development of my ability to teach new means of solving engineering problems through the use of technology. 5	Outcomes of workshop included the development of my ability to teach new means of solving engineering problems through the use of technology. 6 (SA)
Outcomes of workshop included support for me in identifying resources I need to improve my teaching.	Outcomes of workshop included support for me in identifying resources I need to improve my teaching. 1 (SD)	Outcomes of workshop included support for me in identifying resources I need to improve my teaching. 2	Outcomes of workshop included support for me in identifying resources I need to improve my teaching. 3	Outcomes of workshop included support for me in identifying resources I need to improve my teaching. 4	Outcomes of workshop included support for me in identifying resources I need to improve my teaching. 5	Outcomes of workshop included support for me in identifying resources I need to improve my teaching. 6 (SA)

Question Title

* 12. Curriculum and Instructional practice.

Please give an example of at least one new insight related to curriculum and/or instructional practices that you gained as a result of participating in the workshop.

Question Title

* 13. Curriculum and Instructional practice.
Please give an example of at least one change in instructional practice that you will make as a result of your participation in this workshop.

Question Title

* 14. Curriculum and Instructional practice.
Please give an example of one change in your students’ learning that you expect to see occur because of any changes you make because of participating in this workshop.

Question Title

* 15. How do you think the information shared during the workshop might impact your philosophy of education/teaching? (i.e. impact on the philosophy of instructional practices, curriculum design, student interaction, etc.)

Multi-Disciplinary Experimental-Centric Pedagogy (ECP) Workshop Reflections. June 16 & 17, 2021: Morgan State University

Question Title

* 1. What is your gender?

Question Title

* 2. Current Position:

Question Title

* 3. Age Group

Question Title

Question Title

Question Title

Question Title

Question Title

Question Title

Question Title

Question Title

Question Title

* 12. Curriculum and Instructional practice.

Please give an example of at least one new insight related to curriculum and/or instructional practices that you gained as a result of participating in the workshop.

Question Title

* 13. Curriculum and Instructional practice.
Please give an example of at least one change in instructional practice that you will make as a result of your participation in this workshop.

Question Title

* 14. Curriculum and Instructional practice.
Please give an example of one change in your students’ learning that you expect to see occur because of any changes you make because of participating in this workshop.

Question Title

* 15. How do you think the information shared during the workshop might impact your philosophy of education/teaching? (i.e. impact on the philosophy of instructional practices, curriculum design, student interaction, etc.)

Question Title

* 16. Do you think the use of these devices/tools might impact your assessment of your students? If so, how?

Question Title

* 17. Overall, what was the best thing about this workshop?

Question Title

* 18. Please share any additional comments or suggestions for a future workshop.

Multi-Disciplinary Experimental-Centric Pedagogy (ECP) Workshop Reflections. June 16 & 17, 2021: Morgan State University

Question Title

* 1. What is your gender?

Question Title

* 2. Current Position:

Question Title

* 3. Age Group

Question Title

Question Title

Question Title

Question Title

Question Title

Question Title

Question Title

Question Title

Question Title

* 12. Curriculum and Instructional practice.Please give an example of at least one new insight related to curriculum and/or instructional practices that you gained as a result of participating in the workshop.

Question Title

* 13. Curriculum and Instructional practice.Please give an example of at least one change in instructional practice that you will make as a result of your participation in this workshop.

Question Title

* 14. Curriculum and Instructional practice.Please give an example of one change in your students’ learning that you expect to see occur because of any changes you make because of participating in this workshop.

Question Title

* 15. How do you think the information shared during the workshop might impact your philosophy of education/teaching? (i.e. impact on the philosophy of instructional practices, curriculum design, student interaction, etc.)

Question Title

* 16. Do you think the use of these devices/tools might impact your assessment of your students? If so, how?

Question Title

* 17. Overall, what was the best thing about this workshop?

Question Title

* 18. Please share any additional comments or suggestions for a future workshop.

* 12. Curriculum and Instructional practice.

Please give an example of at least one new insight related to curriculum and/or instructional practices that you gained as a result of participating in the workshop.

* 13. Curriculum and Instructional practice.
Please give an example of at least one change in instructional practice that you will make as a result of your participation in this workshop.

* 14. Curriculum and Instructional practice.
Please give an example of one change in your students’ learning that you expect to see occur because of any changes you make because of participating in this workshop.