Walk magazine winter 2024 (digital edition)
Share your feedback on our special digital edition of Walk magazine
OK
1.
How do you rate the following benefits of a digital magazine over a printed magazine? (1 = not at all important, 5 = very important)
1: Not at all important
2
3
4
5: Very important
Reduced carbon emissions by eliminating paper, ink, wrapping film, machinery and transportation emissions.
1: Not at all important
2
3
4
5: Very important
New features that aren’t possible in a printed magazine, including video, audio, animated and interactive content
1: Not at all important
2
3
4
5: Very important
Improved accessibility for visually impaired people.
1: Not at all important
2
3
4
5: Very important
Optional comments box
2.
How do you rate the following aspects of the digital magazine? (1 = very poor, 5 = very good)
1: Very poor
2
3
4
5: Very good
Ease of finding the article you wanted to read
1: Very poor
2
3
4
5: Very good
Ease of reading articles
1: Very poor
2
3
4
5: Very good
Ease of watching videos
1: Very poor
2
3
4
5: Very good
Quality of the written content
1: Very poor
2
3
4
5: Very good
Quality of the video / audio content
1: Very poor
2
3
4
5: Very good
Convenience of having the magazine on my smartphone / tablet
1: Very poor
2
3
4
5: Very good
Easy to share with friends and family or on social media
1: Very poor
2
3
4
5: Very good
Optional comments box
3.
How do you rate the following features within the magazine? (1 = very boring/not useful, 5 = very interesting/very useful)
1: Very boring/not useful
2
3
4
5: Very interesting/very useful
Ninety years of the Ramblers (anniversary timeline)
1: Very boring/not useful
2
3
4
5: Very interesting/very useful
National treasures: 75 years of our national parks
1: Very boring/not useful
2
3
4
5: Very interesting/very useful
Ten places: Cosy pub walks
1: Very boring/not useful
2
3
4
5: Very interesting/very useful
Walk + Talk with Bill Bailey
1: Very boring/not useful
2
3
4
5: Very interesting/very useful
Ramblers Routes (mapped walks)
1: Very boring/not useful
2
3
4
5: Very interesting/very useful
Destination: Galicia - Lights fantastic
1: Very boring/not useful
2
3
4
5: Very interesting/very useful
Gear on Test: Waterproof walking jackets
1: Very boring/not useful
2
3
4
5: Very interesting/very useful
Masterclass: Food to fuel your adventures
1: Very boring/not useful
2
3
4
5: Very interesting/very useful
Members’ mailbag (readers’ letters and Ask the Experts)
1: Very boring/not useful
2
3
4
5: Very interesting/very useful
Rambling round-up (national news)
1: Very boring/not useful
2
3
4
5: Very interesting/very useful
Three cheers for our volunteers! (volunteering news)
1: Very boring/not useful
2
3
4
5: Very interesting/very useful
Ramblers’ rest (crossword and quiz)
1: Very boring/not useful
2
3
4
5: Very interesting/very useful
4.
How did the format of the following features in the digital magazine compare to the normal version in the printed magazine? (1 = much worse, 5 = much better)
1: Much worse
2
3
4
5: Much better
Ramblers Routes (downloadable info / videos)
1: Much worse
2
3
4
5: Much better
Gear on Test (video)
1: Much worse
2
3
4
5: Much better
Crossword (online completion)
1: Much worse
2
3
4
5: Much better
Masterclass (downloadable recipe cards)
1: Much worse
2
3
4
5: Much better
Optional comments box
5.
Which device(s) did you use to read the digital magazine? (tick any that apply)
Desktop computer
Laptop computer
Tablet (e.g iPad, Kindle Fire)
Smartphone
6.
How would you rate the digital version of Walk magazine? (1 = very poor, 5 = very good)
1: Very poor
2
3
4
5: Very good
1: Very poor
2
3
4
5: Very good
7.
Do you have any feedback you would like to share on this trial edition of the magazine?
8.
Which age range are you?
<25
25 – 34
35 - 44
45 - 54
55 - 64
65 - 74
75 - 84
85 or over
Prefer not to say
9.
Do you consider yourself to have a visual impairment?
Yes
No
Not sure
Current Progress,
0 of 9 answered
