National Pain Strategy development- rationale and process, exemplars from other fields (Thursday, May 24, 2018)

Thursday May 24, 2018 | 4:00 pm - 5:30 pm

Please complete this evaluation which will be used to finalize the accreditation process. Kindly take 2-3 minutes to complete all of the below questions.

Question Title

* 1. Please indicate your answer for each question below

	Strongly Agree (5)	Agree (4)	Neutral (3)	Disagree (2)	Strongly Disagree(1)
This session was appropriate and will help me modify my practice	This session was appropriate and will help me modify my practice Strongly Agree (5)	This session was appropriate and will help me modify my practice Agree (4)	This session was appropriate and will help me modify my practice Neutral (3)	This session was appropriate and will help me modify my practice Disagree (2)	This session was appropriate and will help me modify my practice Strongly Disagree(1)
This session met my needs	This session met my needs Strongly Agree (5)	This session met my needs Agree (4)	This session met my needs Neutral (3)	This session met my needs Disagree (2)	This session met my needs Strongly Disagree(1)

Comments

Question Title

* 2. Did you perceive any degree of bias in any part of the presentation?

Yes

No

Question Title

* 3. Did the activity respect the Quebec Code of Ethics (CQDPCM)?

Yes

No

Question Title

* 4. The session fulfilled the learning objectives defined below (See question 5)

Yes

No

Not Sure

Question Title

* 5. At the conclusion of this activity I will be able to:

	Yes	No
To bring a patient perspective onto the issues around a national pain strategy	To bring a patient perspective onto the issues around a national pain strategy Yes	To bring a patient perspective onto the issues around a national pain strategy No
To chronicle the current Canadian state of development of a National Pain Strategy, from the perspective of one of the leaders of that process.	To chronicle the current Canadian state of development of a National Pain Strategy, from the perspective of one of the leaders of that process. Yes	To chronicle the current Canadian state of development of a National Pain Strategy, from the perspective of one of the leaders of that process. No
To discuss how the lessons learned in the development and implementation of the Australian National Pain Strategy might inform the development and implementation of a Canadian National Pain Strategy.	To discuss how the lessons learned in the development and implementation of the Australian National Pain Strategy might inform the development and implementation of a Canadian National Pain Strategy. Yes	To discuss how the lessons learned in the development and implementation of the Australian National Pain Strategy might inform the development and implementation of a Canadian National Pain Strategy. No

Question Title

* 6. Speaker 1 Evaluation: Billie Jo Bogden

	Strongly Agree (5)	Agree(4)	Neutral (3)	Disagree(2)	Strongly Disagree(1)
The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Strongly Agree (5)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Agree(4)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Neutral (3)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Disagree(2)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Strongly Disagree(1)
This program content has enhanced my knowledge	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Strongly Agree (5)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Agree(4)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Neutral (3)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Disagree(2)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Strongly Disagree(1)
The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Strongly Agree (5)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Agree(4)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Neutral (3)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Disagree(2)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Strongly Disagree(1)

Comments

Question Title

* 7. Did the presenter (Speaker 1) make a disclosure statement? (Verbal and with slide)

Yes

No

Not Sure

Question Title

* 8. Speaker 2 Evaluation: Mary Lynch

	Strongly Agree (5)	Agree(4)	Neutral (3)	Disagree(2)	Strongly Disagree(1)
The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Strongly Agree (5)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Agree(4)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Neutral (3)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Disagree(2)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Strongly Disagree(1)
This program content has enhanced my knowledge	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Strongly Agree (5)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Agree(4)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Neutral (3)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Disagree(2)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Strongly Disagree(1)
The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Strongly Agree (5)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Agree(4)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Neutral (3)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Disagree(2)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Strongly Disagree(1)

Comments

Question Title

* 9. Did the presenter (Speaker 2) make a disclosure statement? (Verbal and with slide)

Yes

No

Not Sure

Question Title

* 10. Speaker 3 Evaluation: Owen Williamson

	Strongly Agree (5)	Agree(4)	Neutral (3)	Disagree(2)	Strongly Disagree(1)
The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Strongly Agree (5)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Agree(4)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Neutral (3)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Disagree(2)	The presenter has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject Strongly Disagree(1)
This program content has enhanced my knowledge	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Strongly Agree (5)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Agree(4)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Neutral (3)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Disagree(2)	This program content has enhanced my knowledge Strongly Disagree(1)
The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Strongly Agree (5)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Agree(4)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Neutral (3)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Disagree(2)	The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking Strongly Disagree(1)

Comments

Question Title

* 11. Did the presenter (Speaker 3) make a disclosure statement? (Verbal and with slide)

Yes

No

Not Sure